解密巴西药用植物和药方的历史织锦:对 1806 至 1818 年间皇家植物园销售记录的分析

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Lorraynne Oliveira de Souza, Ygor Jessé Ramos, Nina Cláudia Barboza da Silva
{"title":"解密巴西药用植物和药方的历史织锦:对 1806 至 1818 年间皇家植物园销售记录的分析","authors":"Leonardo de Souza Carvalho,&nbsp;Lorraynne Oliveira de Souza,&nbsp;Ygor Jessé Ramos,&nbsp;Nina Cláudia Barboza da Silva","doi":"10.1007/s13596-024-00759-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to explore previously overlooked facets of the commercialization and utilization of medicinal plants and their derivatives in the \"Botica Real\" (Royal Apothecary) from 1806 to 1818. Using primary sources from the National Library of Brazil, the National Archives, the Brazilian Historical and Geographic Institute, and online newspaper libraries, a thorough document analysis was conducted. Key documents include the \"Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos símplices, preparados e compostos\", lists of shipments from the “Botica Real” in Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro (Brazilian states), \"Post-mortem Inventories\" of merchants, and the \"Pharmacopoeia Geral para o Reino e Domínios de Portugal\". The examination of these documents unveiled terms related to medicinal species, their scientific names, parts used, and application methods. These terms were categorized by their origin (animal, vegetable, or mineral), with a particular focus on plant species, where botanical nomenclature was updated. The research highlighted an evolution in the number of terms associated with medicinal plants, increasing from 219 in 1806 to 303 in 1818, with a total of 156 identified species across 58 botanical families. Notably, Lamiaceae had 15 species, followed by Asteraceae (14) and Fabaceae (12). Exotic species constituted 85%, while naturalized and native Brazilian species comprised 9% and 5%, respectively. The study documented various pharmaceutical preparations, predominantly in solid, liquid, and semi-solid forms, with spirits, elixirs, and solutions being the most common, along with tinctures, fluid extracts, and compounded powders. This historical survey not only sheds light on past pharmaceutical practices with medicinal plants but also offers valuable insights for contemporary phytotherapy.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7613,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Traditional Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"1093 - 1113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering the historical tapestry of medicinal plants and remedies in Brazil: an analysis of sales records from the Botica Real between 1806 and 1818\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo de Souza Carvalho,&nbsp;Lorraynne Oliveira de Souza,&nbsp;Ygor Jessé Ramos,&nbsp;Nina Cláudia Barboza da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13596-024-00759-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to explore previously overlooked facets of the commercialization and utilization of medicinal plants and their derivatives in the \\\"Botica Real\\\" (Royal Apothecary) from 1806 to 1818. Using primary sources from the National Library of Brazil, the National Archives, the Brazilian Historical and Geographic Institute, and online newspaper libraries, a thorough document analysis was conducted. Key documents include the \\\"Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos símplices, preparados e compostos\\\", lists of shipments from the “Botica Real” in Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro (Brazilian states), \\\"Post-mortem Inventories\\\" of merchants, and the \\\"Pharmacopoeia Geral para o Reino e Domínios de Portugal\\\". The examination of these documents unveiled terms related to medicinal species, their scientific names, parts used, and application methods. These terms were categorized by their origin (animal, vegetable, or mineral), with a particular focus on plant species, where botanical nomenclature was updated. The research highlighted an evolution in the number of terms associated with medicinal plants, increasing from 219 in 1806 to 303 in 1818, with a total of 156 identified species across 58 botanical families. Notably, Lamiaceae had 15 species, followed by Asteraceae (14) and Fabaceae (12). Exotic species constituted 85%, while naturalized and native Brazilian species comprised 9% and 5%, respectively. The study documented various pharmaceutical preparations, predominantly in solid, liquid, and semi-solid forms, with spirits, elixirs, and solutions being the most common, along with tinctures, fluid extracts, and compounded powders. This historical survey not only sheds light on past pharmaceutical practices with medicinal plants but also offers valuable insights for contemporary phytotherapy.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Traditional Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"1093 - 1113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Traditional Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13596-024-00759-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Traditional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13596-024-00759-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 1806 年至 1818 年期间 "皇家药房"(Botica Real)中药用植物及其衍生物的商业化和利用方面以前被忽视的问题。利用巴西国家图书馆、国家档案馆、巴西历史和地理研究所以及在线报纸图书馆的原始资料,进行了全面的文献分析。主要文件包括 "Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos símplices, preparados e compostos"、巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州和里约热内卢州 "Botica Real "的货物清单、商人的 "死后清单 "以及 "Pharmacopoeia Geral para o Reino e Domínios de Portugal"。对这些文献的研究揭示了与药用物种、其学名、使用部位和应用方法有关的术语。这些术语按其来源(动物、植物或矿物)进行了分类,尤其侧重于植物物种,其中植物学术语得到了更新。研究强调了与药用植物相关的术语数量的演变,从 1806 年的 219 个增加到 1818 年的 303 个,58 个植物科中共有 156 个已确定的物种。值得注意的是,唇形科有 15 个物种,其次是菊科(14 个)和豆科(12 个)。外来物种占 85%,归化物种和巴西本地物种分别占 9% 和 5%。研究记录了各种药物制剂,主要以固体、液体和半固体形式存在,其中最常见的是烈性酒、酏剂和溶液,此外还有酊剂、液体提取物和复方粉末。这项历史调查不仅揭示了过去药用植物的制药方法,还为当代植物疗法提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deciphering the historical tapestry of medicinal plants and remedies in Brazil: an analysis of sales records from the Botica Real between 1806 and 1818

Deciphering the historical tapestry of medicinal plants and remedies in Brazil: an analysis of sales records from the Botica Real between 1806 and 1818

This study aims to explore previously overlooked facets of the commercialization and utilization of medicinal plants and their derivatives in the "Botica Real" (Royal Apothecary) from 1806 to 1818. Using primary sources from the National Library of Brazil, the National Archives, the Brazilian Historical and Geographic Institute, and online newspaper libraries, a thorough document analysis was conducted. Key documents include the "Regimento dos preços dos medicamentos símplices, preparados e compostos", lists of shipments from the “Botica Real” in Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro (Brazilian states), "Post-mortem Inventories" of merchants, and the "Pharmacopoeia Geral para o Reino e Domínios de Portugal". The examination of these documents unveiled terms related to medicinal species, their scientific names, parts used, and application methods. These terms were categorized by their origin (animal, vegetable, or mineral), with a particular focus on plant species, where botanical nomenclature was updated. The research highlighted an evolution in the number of terms associated with medicinal plants, increasing from 219 in 1806 to 303 in 1818, with a total of 156 identified species across 58 botanical families. Notably, Lamiaceae had 15 species, followed by Asteraceae (14) and Fabaceae (12). Exotic species constituted 85%, while naturalized and native Brazilian species comprised 9% and 5%, respectively. The study documented various pharmaceutical preparations, predominantly in solid, liquid, and semi-solid forms, with spirits, elixirs, and solutions being the most common, along with tinctures, fluid extracts, and compounded powders. This historical survey not only sheds light on past pharmaceutical practices with medicinal plants but also offers valuable insights for contemporary phytotherapy.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Traditional Medicine
Advances in Traditional Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Advances in Traditional Medicine (ADTM) is an international and peer-reviewed journal and publishes a variety of articles including original researches, reviews, short communications, and case-reports. ADTM aims to bridging the gap between Traditional knowledge and medical advances. The journal focuses on publishing valid, relevant, and rigorous experimental research and clinical applications of Traditidnal Medicine as well as medical classics. At the same time, the journal is devoted to communication among basic researcher and medical clinician interested in the advancement of Traditional Medicine. Topics covered by the journal are: Medical Classics & History; Biomedical Research; Pharmacology & Toxicology of Natural Products; Acupuncture & Moxibustion; Sasang Constitutional Medicine; Diagnostics and Instrumental Development; Clinical Research. ADTM is published four times yearly. The publication date of this journal is 30th March, June, September, and December.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信