将骨小梁评分作为确定 SAPHO 综合征椎体骨折风险的评估工具

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zaizhu Zhang, Yi Zhang, Wei Yu
{"title":"将骨小梁评分作为确定 SAPHO 综合征椎体骨折风险的评估工具","authors":"Zaizhu Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01472-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>\n <i>Summary</i>\n </h3><p>This is the first study to report that TBS seems not only unaffected by bone artifacts, but also is superior to BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures in SAPHO patients, which highlights the importance of adding TBS measurement to DXA images in routine clinical evaluation.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the impact of bone artifacts on trabecular bone score (TBS) and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyze the clinical utility of TBS evaluation for vertebral fracture (VF) risk assessment in SAPHO patients compared with BMD assessment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventy SAPHO patients (mean age 50.1 (10.7) years, 81% women) and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. TBS and BMD were assessed using DXA. Bone artifacts and VF of the spine were evaluated using whole-spine CT. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with VF. Odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation decrease in TBS and BMDs were estimated from logistic regression models with adjustment for age.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In patients with bone artifacts, TBS, but not LS BMD, was lower than matched controls, and in those without bone artifacts, both BMDs and TBS were lower than controls. After adjustment, LS BMD was significantly lower in the SAPHO group than in controls. TBS and LS BMD (OR [95% confidence interval], 12.0 [3.6, 40.4] and 4.7 [2.0, 10.9]) showed statistically significant ORs but the others did not. For evaluating VF in SAPHO patients, TBS showed the greatest AUC in the ROC curve, with a value of 0.920 compared with 0.777, 0.690, and 0.652 for LS, FN, and TH BMD, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TBS seems not to be influenced by bone artifacts in opposition to LS BMD and has a better discriminatory value than BMD for VF in SAPHO patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trabecular bone score as an assessment tool to identify the risk of vertebral fractures in SAPHO syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Zaizhu Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01472-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>\\n <i>Summary</i>\\n </h3><p>This is the first study to report that TBS seems not only unaffected by bone artifacts, but also is superior to BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures in SAPHO patients, which highlights the importance of adding TBS measurement to DXA images in routine clinical evaluation.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the impact of bone artifacts on trabecular bone score (TBS) and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyze the clinical utility of TBS evaluation for vertebral fracture (VF) risk assessment in SAPHO patients compared with BMD assessment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventy SAPHO patients (mean age 50.1 (10.7) years, 81% women) and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. TBS and BMD were assessed using DXA. Bone artifacts and VF of the spine were evaluated using whole-spine CT. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with VF. Odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation decrease in TBS and BMDs were estimated from logistic regression models with adjustment for age.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In patients with bone artifacts, TBS, but not LS BMD, was lower than matched controls, and in those without bone artifacts, both BMDs and TBS were lower than controls. After adjustment, LS BMD was significantly lower in the SAPHO group than in controls. TBS and LS BMD (OR [95% confidence interval], 12.0 [3.6, 40.4] and 4.7 [2.0, 10.9]) showed statistically significant ORs but the others did not. For evaluating VF in SAPHO patients, TBS showed the greatest AUC in the ROC curve, with a value of 0.920 compared with 0.777, 0.690, and 0.652 for LS, FN, and TH BMD, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TBS seems not to be influenced by bone artifacts in opposition to LS BMD and has a better discriminatory value than BMD for VF in SAPHO patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01472-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01472-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 这是第一项报告 TBS 似乎不仅不受骨伪影的影响,而且在鉴别 SAPHO 患者椎体骨折方面优于 BMD 的研究,这凸显了在常规临床评估中将 TBS 测量添加到 DXA 图像中的重要性。目的 研究骨伪影对通过双能 X 射线吸收测量法(DXA)测量的骨小梁评分(TBS)和腰椎骨矿物质密度(BMD)的影响,并分析与 BMD 评估相比,TBS 评估在 SAPHO 患者椎体骨折(VF)风险评估中的临床实用性。方法 共招募了 70 名 SAPHO 患者(平均年龄 50.1 (10.7) 岁,81% 为女性)和相同数量的年龄和性别匹配的对照组。使用 DXA 评估 TBS 和 BMD。使用全脊柱 CT 对脊柱的骨伪影和 VF 进行了评估。为确定与 VF 相关的因素,进行了单变量逻辑回归分析。结果 在有骨假象的患者中,TBS低于匹配的对照组,但LS BMD不低于匹配的对照组;在没有骨假象的患者中,BMD和TBS均低于对照组。经调整后,SAPHO 组的 LS BMD 明显低于对照组。TBS和LS BMD(OR[95%置信区间],12.0 [3.6,40.4]和4.7 [2.0,10.9])的OR具有统计学意义,而其他指标则没有。在评估 SAPHO 患者的 VF 时,TBS 在 ROC 曲线中的 AUC 值最大,为 0.920,而 LS、FN 和 TH BMD 的 AUC 值分别为 0.777、0.690 和 0.652。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trabecular bone score as an assessment tool to identify the risk of vertebral fractures in SAPHO syndrome

Summary

This is the first study to report that TBS seems not only unaffected by bone artifacts, but also is superior to BMD in the discrimination of vertebral fractures in SAPHO patients, which highlights the importance of adding TBS measurement to DXA images in routine clinical evaluation.

Purpose

To investigate the impact of bone artifacts on trabecular bone score (TBS) and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyze the clinical utility of TBS evaluation for vertebral fracture (VF) risk assessment in SAPHO patients compared with BMD assessment.

Methods

Seventy SAPHO patients (mean age 50.1 (10.7) years, 81% women) and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. TBS and BMD were assessed using DXA. Bone artifacts and VF of the spine were evaluated using whole-spine CT. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with VF. Odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation decrease in TBS and BMDs were estimated from logistic regression models with adjustment for age.

Results

In patients with bone artifacts, TBS, but not LS BMD, was lower than matched controls, and in those without bone artifacts, both BMDs and TBS were lower than controls. After adjustment, LS BMD was significantly lower in the SAPHO group than in controls. TBS and LS BMD (OR [95% confidence interval], 12.0 [3.6, 40.4] and 4.7 [2.0, 10.9]) showed statistically significant ORs but the others did not. For evaluating VF in SAPHO patients, TBS showed the greatest AUC in the ROC curve, with a value of 0.920 compared with 0.777, 0.690, and 0.652 for LS, FN, and TH BMD, respectively.

Conclusion

TBS seems not to be influenced by bone artifacts in opposition to LS BMD and has a better discriminatory value than BMD for VF in SAPHO patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信