Alex Steven Valencia Ortiz, Guilherme Melgaço Heluy, Maria do Carmo Mohaupt Marques Ludke, Luis Otávio Brito, Juliana Ferreira dos Santos, Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello, Jorge Vitor Ludke, Adrielle Carneiro de Araújo Santos, Elton Francisco de Oliveira, José Anderson Gomes da Silva, Arlei Coldebella
{"title":"尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)幼鱼日粮中蚯蚓粉(Eisenia andrei)和沸石的效果和经济可行性","authors":"Alex Steven Valencia Ortiz, Guilherme Melgaço Heluy, Maria do Carmo Mohaupt Marques Ludke, Luis Otávio Brito, Juliana Ferreira dos Santos, Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello, Jorge Vitor Ludke, Adrielle Carneiro de Araújo Santos, Elton Francisco de Oliveira, José Anderson Gomes da Silva, Arlei Coldebella","doi":"10.1007/s10499-024-01676-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluated inclusion levels (0, 3.5, 7, and 10.5%) of earthworm meal (<i>Eisenia andrei</i>) in diets for GIFT Nile tilapia (<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>) fingerlings with and without 2% zeolite. The experiment used a 4 × 2 factorial design with three replicates, involving 24 tanks, each stocked with seven fish (2.672 ± 0.22 g). Water quality parameters, growth performance, proximate composition of fish carcass and biometric indices were analyzed, along with an economic assessment. Results showed that zeolite significantly reduced nitrogenous compounds and coliforms in water (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Earthworm meal did not affect water quality (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, 7% and 10.5% inclusion of earthworm meal significantly improved growth performance (<i>P</i> < 0.05), including final body weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency, specific growth rate, protein efficiency ratio, and condition factor. Zeolite did not affect growth performance (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Proximate composition and biometric indices were not significantly impacted by either product (<i>P</i> > 0.05), except for lower carcass ether extract with zeolite and higher protein and energy retention coefficient with 7% and 10% earthworm meal (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Economically, diets with earthworm meal were more expensive (USD 25.05/kg), but the viable price was determined to be USD 1.27/kg, without negatively affecting economic indices. Zeolite did not significantly impact other economic parameters (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, earthworm meals can be added to Nile tilapia diets at 7% to 10.5% to enhance growth performance, with 7% recommended for cost considerations. Zeolite at 2% can improve water quality without affecting production costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8122,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture International","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects and economic viability of earthworm meal (Eisenia andrei) and zeolite in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings\",\"authors\":\"Alex Steven Valencia Ortiz, Guilherme Melgaço Heluy, Maria do Carmo Mohaupt Marques Ludke, Luis Otávio Brito, Juliana Ferreira dos Santos, Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello, Jorge Vitor Ludke, Adrielle Carneiro de Araújo Santos, Elton Francisco de Oliveira, José Anderson Gomes da Silva, Arlei Coldebella\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10499-024-01676-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study evaluated inclusion levels (0, 3.5, 7, and 10.5%) of earthworm meal (<i>Eisenia andrei</i>) in diets for GIFT Nile tilapia (<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>) fingerlings with and without 2% zeolite. The experiment used a 4 × 2 factorial design with three replicates, involving 24 tanks, each stocked with seven fish (2.672 ± 0.22 g). Water quality parameters, growth performance, proximate composition of fish carcass and biometric indices were analyzed, along with an economic assessment. Results showed that zeolite significantly reduced nitrogenous compounds and coliforms in water (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Earthworm meal did not affect water quality (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, 7% and 10.5% inclusion of earthworm meal significantly improved growth performance (<i>P</i> < 0.05), including final body weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency, specific growth rate, protein efficiency ratio, and condition factor. Zeolite did not affect growth performance (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Proximate composition and biometric indices were not significantly impacted by either product (<i>P</i> > 0.05), except for lower carcass ether extract with zeolite and higher protein and energy retention coefficient with 7% and 10% earthworm meal (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Economically, diets with earthworm meal were more expensive (USD 25.05/kg), but the viable price was determined to be USD 1.27/kg, without negatively affecting economic indices. Zeolite did not significantly impact other economic parameters (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, earthworm meals can be added to Nile tilapia diets at 7% to 10.5% to enhance growth performance, with 7% recommended for cost considerations. Zeolite at 2% can improve water quality without affecting production costs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture International\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-024-01676-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-024-01676-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects and economic viability of earthworm meal (Eisenia andrei) and zeolite in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings
This study evaluated inclusion levels (0, 3.5, 7, and 10.5%) of earthworm meal (Eisenia andrei) in diets for GIFT Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings with and without 2% zeolite. The experiment used a 4 × 2 factorial design with three replicates, involving 24 tanks, each stocked with seven fish (2.672 ± 0.22 g). Water quality parameters, growth performance, proximate composition of fish carcass and biometric indices were analyzed, along with an economic assessment. Results showed that zeolite significantly reduced nitrogenous compounds and coliforms in water (P < 0.05). Earthworm meal did not affect water quality (P > 0.05). However, 7% and 10.5% inclusion of earthworm meal significantly improved growth performance (P < 0.05), including final body weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency, specific growth rate, protein efficiency ratio, and condition factor. Zeolite did not affect growth performance (P > 0.05). Proximate composition and biometric indices were not significantly impacted by either product (P > 0.05), except for lower carcass ether extract with zeolite and higher protein and energy retention coefficient with 7% and 10% earthworm meal (P < 0.05). Economically, diets with earthworm meal were more expensive (USD 25.05/kg), but the viable price was determined to be USD 1.27/kg, without negatively affecting economic indices. Zeolite did not significantly impact other economic parameters (P > 0.05). In conclusion, earthworm meals can be added to Nile tilapia diets at 7% to 10.5% to enhance growth performance, with 7% recommended for cost considerations. Zeolite at 2% can improve water quality without affecting production costs.
期刊介绍:
Aquaculture International is an international journal publishing original research papers, short communications, technical notes and review papers on all aspects of aquaculture.
The Journal covers topics such as the biology, physiology, pathology and genetics of cultured fish, crustaceans, molluscs and plants, especially new species; water quality of supply systems, fluctuations in water quality within farms and the environmental impacts of aquacultural operations; nutrition, feeding and stocking practices, especially as they affect the health and growth rates of cultured species; sustainable production techniques; bioengineering studies on the design and management of offshore and land-based systems; the improvement of quality and marketing of farmed products; sociological and societal impacts of aquaculture, and more.
This is the official Journal of the European Aquaculture Society.