Paula Sardiña, Simon Sharp, Minna Saaristo, Timothy Coggan, Molly Hoak, Paul Leahy
{"title":"土地利用定量分类方法和淡水环境中全氟化烃基和多氟化烃基物质 (PFAS) 含量评估","authors":"Paula Sardiña, Simon Sharp, Minna Saaristo, Timothy Coggan, Molly Hoak, Paul Leahy","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We developed a quantitative method for classifying land uses for PFAS-related investigations in freshwater environments and determined PFAS ambient concentrations associated with specific land-use classes. Furthermore, our study presents a comprehensive assessment of the ambient occurrence and risks of PFAS mixtures beyond the usually studied PFOS-PFOA mixtures. Eighty-five inland (freshwater only) sites were sampled for water, sediment, and riparian soil in Victoria, south-east Australia, and analyzed for 33 PFAS. PFAS were detected in 91% of water samples, 34% of sediment samples, and 28% of riparian soil samples. Four land-use classes were defined: remote, agricultural, mixed, and urban. In the remote land-use class, only PFOS was detected at a low ambient concentration (0.0002 μg/L) in one water sample. Short-chain PFCA were frequently detected in the agricultural and mixed water samples. PFBA had the highest median ambient concentration in both land uses (ca. 0.01 μg/L), contributing to both ΣPFAS (40%) and ΣPFCA (50%) concentrations. In the urban land-use class, several congeners (PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFOS) had median ambient concentrations at or close to 0.01 μg/L and contributed similarly to ΣPFAS (10–20%). Elevated risk to the aquatic environment was found only for PFOS in two mixed and eight urban sites. This pattern was consistent with the finding for PFAS mixtures, where the elevated risk was driven by PFOS at those same sites. Our study provides critical information about environmentally relevant ambient concentrations and PFAS mixtures. This information, together with the land-use classification approach presented herein, can be used as reference levels for several critical purposes, including identifying PFAS-contaminated sites, informing land use planning and development decisions, setting standards and guidelines, and tracking changes over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 125272"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative classification method of land uses and assessment of per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) occurrence in freshwater environments\",\"authors\":\"Paula Sardiña, Simon Sharp, Minna Saaristo, Timothy Coggan, Molly Hoak, Paul Leahy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We developed a quantitative method for classifying land uses for PFAS-related investigations in freshwater environments and determined PFAS ambient concentrations associated with specific land-use classes. Furthermore, our study presents a comprehensive assessment of the ambient occurrence and risks of PFAS mixtures beyond the usually studied PFOS-PFOA mixtures. Eighty-five inland (freshwater only) sites were sampled for water, sediment, and riparian soil in Victoria, south-east Australia, and analyzed for 33 PFAS. PFAS were detected in 91% of water samples, 34% of sediment samples, and 28% of riparian soil samples. Four land-use classes were defined: remote, agricultural, mixed, and urban. In the remote land-use class, only PFOS was detected at a low ambient concentration (0.0002 μg/L) in one water sample. Short-chain PFCA were frequently detected in the agricultural and mixed water samples. PFBA had the highest median ambient concentration in both land uses (ca. 0.01 μg/L), contributing to both ΣPFAS (40%) and ΣPFCA (50%) concentrations. In the urban land-use class, several congeners (PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFOS) had median ambient concentrations at or close to 0.01 μg/L and contributed similarly to ΣPFAS (10–20%). Elevated risk to the aquatic environment was found only for PFOS in two mixed and eight urban sites. This pattern was consistent with the finding for PFAS mixtures, where the elevated risk was driven by PFOS at those same sites. Our study provides critical information about environmentally relevant ambient concentrations and PFAS mixtures. This information, together with the land-use classification approach presented herein, can be used as reference levels for several critical purposes, including identifying PFAS-contaminated sites, informing land use planning and development decisions, setting standards and guidelines, and tracking changes over time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"volume\":\"363 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124019894\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124019894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A quantitative classification method of land uses and assessment of per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) occurrence in freshwater environments
We developed a quantitative method for classifying land uses for PFAS-related investigations in freshwater environments and determined PFAS ambient concentrations associated with specific land-use classes. Furthermore, our study presents a comprehensive assessment of the ambient occurrence and risks of PFAS mixtures beyond the usually studied PFOS-PFOA mixtures. Eighty-five inland (freshwater only) sites were sampled for water, sediment, and riparian soil in Victoria, south-east Australia, and analyzed for 33 PFAS. PFAS were detected in 91% of water samples, 34% of sediment samples, and 28% of riparian soil samples. Four land-use classes were defined: remote, agricultural, mixed, and urban. In the remote land-use class, only PFOS was detected at a low ambient concentration (0.0002 μg/L) in one water sample. Short-chain PFCA were frequently detected in the agricultural and mixed water samples. PFBA had the highest median ambient concentration in both land uses (ca. 0.01 μg/L), contributing to both ΣPFAS (40%) and ΣPFCA (50%) concentrations. In the urban land-use class, several congeners (PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFOS) had median ambient concentrations at or close to 0.01 μg/L and contributed similarly to ΣPFAS (10–20%). Elevated risk to the aquatic environment was found only for PFOS in two mixed and eight urban sites. This pattern was consistent with the finding for PFAS mixtures, where the elevated risk was driven by PFOS at those same sites. Our study provides critical information about environmentally relevant ambient concentrations and PFAS mixtures. This information, together with the land-use classification approach presented herein, can be used as reference levels for several critical purposes, including identifying PFAS-contaminated sites, informing land use planning and development decisions, setting standards and guidelines, and tracking changes over time.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Subject areas include, but are not limited to:
• Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies;
• Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change;
• Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest;
• New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.