了解大麻在印度中部全新世的存在情况

Meghna Agarwala , Charuta Kulkarni
{"title":"了解大麻在印度中部全新世的存在情况","authors":"Meghna Agarwala ,&nbsp;Charuta Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.qeh.2024.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pollen records from sediment cores do not allow understanding of past human use of <em>Cannabis</em> because <em>Cannabis</em> may also grow naturally or increase incidentally in the presence of human settlements. This is particularly true in Asia, where <em>Cannabis</em> was not used as hemp as often as it was in Europe; hemp retting makes it easy to identify <em>Cannabis</em> use as it causes characteristically high increases in <em>Cannabis</em> fossil pollen in strata where it was used. In this study, we evaluate the evidence for <em>Cannabis</em> cultivation and use in Central India, where <em>Cannabis</em> fossil pollen occur in sediment cores from ∼ 12.2 ka (1 ka= 1000 y ago). While the public perception is that <em>Cannabis</em> has a long history of use in South Asia, textual sources suggest significant increases in <em>Cannabis</em> use ∼1–2 ka. To disentangle <em>Cannabis</em> presence due to natural dispersal and due to use, we develop a new approach. <em>Artemisia</em> grows alongside <em>Cannabis</em> and disperses in similar conditions, whether naturally or due to increase in human settlements. We investigate when <em>Cannabis</em> increased in the paleo-record independent of <em>Artemisia,</em> and find that <em>Cannabis</em> increased ∼ 2.5 ka in areas close to major early historic settlements, where <em>Cannabis</em> displays characteristic patterns of cultivation. <em>Cannabis</em> does not display these patterns away from the early historic settlements. These dates are similar to findings of <em>Cannabis</em> use as hemp in the Himalayas (2.5 ka) and as a drug in China (2.7 ka), but pre-date the proliferation of <em>Cannabis</em> presence in textual sources. Overall, <em>Cannabis</em> pollen presence in pre-historic India (&lt;2.5 ka), although common, is likely to be because of natural dispersal of <em>Cannabis</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101053,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","volume":"2 6","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the presence of Cannabis across the Holocene in Central India\",\"authors\":\"Meghna Agarwala ,&nbsp;Charuta Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qeh.2024.100032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pollen records from sediment cores do not allow understanding of past human use of <em>Cannabis</em> because <em>Cannabis</em> may also grow naturally or increase incidentally in the presence of human settlements. This is particularly true in Asia, where <em>Cannabis</em> was not used as hemp as often as it was in Europe; hemp retting makes it easy to identify <em>Cannabis</em> use as it causes characteristically high increases in <em>Cannabis</em> fossil pollen in strata where it was used. In this study, we evaluate the evidence for <em>Cannabis</em> cultivation and use in Central India, where <em>Cannabis</em> fossil pollen occur in sediment cores from ∼ 12.2 ka (1 ka= 1000 y ago). While the public perception is that <em>Cannabis</em> has a long history of use in South Asia, textual sources suggest significant increases in <em>Cannabis</em> use ∼1–2 ka. To disentangle <em>Cannabis</em> presence due to natural dispersal and due to use, we develop a new approach. <em>Artemisia</em> grows alongside <em>Cannabis</em> and disperses in similar conditions, whether naturally or due to increase in human settlements. We investigate when <em>Cannabis</em> increased in the paleo-record independent of <em>Artemisia,</em> and find that <em>Cannabis</em> increased ∼ 2.5 ka in areas close to major early historic settlements, where <em>Cannabis</em> displays characteristic patterns of cultivation. <em>Cannabis</em> does not display these patterns away from the early historic settlements. These dates are similar to findings of <em>Cannabis</em> use as hemp in the Himalayas (2.5 ka) and as a drug in China (2.7 ka), but pre-date the proliferation of <em>Cannabis</em> presence in textual sources. Overall, <em>Cannabis</em> pollen presence in pre-historic India (&lt;2.5 ka), although common, is likely to be because of natural dispersal of <em>Cannabis</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Environments and Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Environments and Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236524000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236524000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沉积岩芯的花粉记录无法了解人类过去对大麻的使用情况,因为大麻也可能自然生长,或在人类居住区附近偶然增加。这一点在亚洲尤为明显,因为在亚洲,大麻不像在欧洲那样经常作为麻类使用;麻类的翻新很容易确定大麻的使用情况,因为在使用大麻的地层中,大麻化石花粉的增加具有典型特征。在这项研究中,我们评估了印度中部大麻种植和使用的证据,那里的大麻化石花粉出现在 12.2 ka(1 ka= 1000 年前)的沉积岩芯中。虽然公众认为大麻在南亚的使用历史悠久,但文字资料表明,大麻的使用在 1-2 ka 以前显著增加。为了区分大麻的存在是由于自然扩散还是由于使用,我们开发了一种新的方法。青蒿与大麻同时生长,并在相似的条件下扩散,无论是自然扩散还是由于人类居住区的增加。我们对古生物记录中大麻的增加时间进行了研究,发现在靠近主要早期历史聚落的地区,大麻的增加时间为 2.5 ka,大麻在这些地区显示出特有的种植模式。在远离早期历史聚落的地区,大麻没有显示出这些模式。这些时间与喜马拉雅山地区将大麻用作大麻(2.5 ka ka)和中国将大麻用作毒品(2.7 ka ka)的发现相似,但却早于大麻在文字资料中大量出现的时间。总体而言,史前印度(2.5 ka)出现大麻花粉的现象虽然很普遍,但很可能是由于大麻的自然扩散造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the presence of Cannabis across the Holocene in Central India
Pollen records from sediment cores do not allow understanding of past human use of Cannabis because Cannabis may also grow naturally or increase incidentally in the presence of human settlements. This is particularly true in Asia, where Cannabis was not used as hemp as often as it was in Europe; hemp retting makes it easy to identify Cannabis use as it causes characteristically high increases in Cannabis fossil pollen in strata where it was used. In this study, we evaluate the evidence for Cannabis cultivation and use in Central India, where Cannabis fossil pollen occur in sediment cores from ∼ 12.2 ka (1 ka= 1000 y ago). While the public perception is that Cannabis has a long history of use in South Asia, textual sources suggest significant increases in Cannabis use ∼1–2 ka. To disentangle Cannabis presence due to natural dispersal and due to use, we develop a new approach. Artemisia grows alongside Cannabis and disperses in similar conditions, whether naturally or due to increase in human settlements. We investigate when Cannabis increased in the paleo-record independent of Artemisia, and find that Cannabis increased ∼ 2.5 ka in areas close to major early historic settlements, where Cannabis displays characteristic patterns of cultivation. Cannabis does not display these patterns away from the early historic settlements. These dates are similar to findings of Cannabis use as hemp in the Himalayas (2.5 ka) and as a drug in China (2.7 ka), but pre-date the proliferation of Cannabis presence in textual sources. Overall, Cannabis pollen presence in pre-historic India (<2.5 ka), although common, is likely to be because of natural dispersal of Cannabis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信