家庭掌握的知识:与精神健康家庭照顾者共同制作和共同研究,了解 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Caroline Walters, Eileen McDonald, Carli Sheers, Kerry Hawkins, Hayley Solich, JulieAnne Anderson, Nevena Simic, Danielle Moore, Tony Stevenson, Sharon Lawn, Melinda Goodyear, Marcelo Maghidman, Melissa Petrakis
{"title":"家庭掌握的知识:与精神健康家庭照顾者共同制作和共同研究,了解 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。","authors":"Caroline Walters,&nbsp;Eileen McDonald,&nbsp;Carli Sheers,&nbsp;Kerry Hawkins,&nbsp;Hayley Solich,&nbsp;JulieAnne Anderson,&nbsp;Nevena Simic,&nbsp;Danielle Moore,&nbsp;Tony Stevenson,&nbsp;Sharon Lawn,&nbsp;Melinda Goodyear,&nbsp;Marcelo Maghidman,&nbsp;Melissa Petrakis","doi":"10.1111/hex.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Through an in-depth exploration of mental health family carers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, this co-produced study identified recommendations for advocacy, practice and policy implications to uphold family carer wellbeing. Government-enforced restrictions, changed service availability and difficulties accessing hospitals, led to additional anxiety, depression and elevated distress, especially for people experiencing mental health challenges before the pandemic. The National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum alongside two academic researchers aimed to discern the impact of care provision, levels of distress, unmet needs, challenges and benefits of providing support, across geographic locations and diverse communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This article reports on the survey component of a co-designed mixed-methods exploratory study of family carer experiences. A project steering group worked with two academic researchers, members of SWITCH Research Group, Monash University, to develop the 71-question online survey across 9-domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Family carers were relied upon to provide support and care when mental health services changed or closed. Carers support more than one person and typically people with daily and high-level needs. Caring levels increased from 26-h to an average of 40-h a week of support provision, with changed roles and increased complexity. Heightened demands became stress-inducing to the point of mental ill health and suicidality for some family carers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Government policy and pandemic responses failed to address the financial, practical or emotional resources needed to fulfil the role of care provision and support to unwell and extremely distressed people with new or ongoing mental and psychological ill-health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>From its inception, this project was co-produced and co-designed with mental health family carers and service users based on their expertise in understanding their experiences and ways to best explore these to the benefit and wellbeing of families in distress. The academic research partners both have active experience of supporting people with mental health challenges. Through each of the identified phases, lived experience expertise (family carers and service users) co-designed and co-facilitated the process. At times leading the process, such as in recruitment strategies, and at other times acting as guides. Guidance was provided by lived experience expertise in reflecting upon the literature review to understand what had been researched internationally and what would be important to understand in Australia. The academic partners advised on the possible processes for data collection, and the lived experience experts decided on the methodology based on that advice. Both the focus group and survey questions were developed and scrutinised from the perspective of the service users and carers in the project team. Difficult conversations were handled with respect, service users within the project team gently addressed areas of enquiry that may suggest stigma or feed into societal stereotypes of people with mental health challenges. Carers were able to consider the wording of questions to still be able to address areas of concern including domestic violence within the family unit and suicide. Dissemination strategies were planned together with the carer and service user representatives being co-presenters at conferences. The report for submission to the National Mental Health Commission (Australia) was written and reviewed with all partners. A committee of service users and carers, alongside the academic partners, planned the launch of the report in August 2023. The co-authorship of peer-reviewed articles has included family carers and service users from the National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Walters,&nbsp;Eileen McDonald,&nbsp;Carli Sheers,&nbsp;Kerry Hawkins,&nbsp;Hayley Solich,&nbsp;JulieAnne Anderson,&nbsp;Nevena Simic,&nbsp;Danielle Moore,&nbsp;Tony Stevenson,&nbsp;Sharon Lawn,&nbsp;Melinda Goodyear,&nbsp;Marcelo Maghidman,&nbsp;Melissa Petrakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through an in-depth exploration of mental health family carers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, this co-produced study identified recommendations for advocacy, practice and policy implications to uphold family carer wellbeing. Government-enforced restrictions, changed service availability and difficulties accessing hospitals, led to additional anxiety, depression and elevated distress, especially for people experiencing mental health challenges before the pandemic. The National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum alongside two academic researchers aimed to discern the impact of care provision, levels of distress, unmet needs, challenges and benefits of providing support, across geographic locations and diverse communities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This article reports on the survey component of a co-designed mixed-methods exploratory study of family carer experiences. A project steering group worked with two academic researchers, members of SWITCH Research Group, Monash University, to develop the 71-question online survey across 9-domains.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Family carers were relied upon to provide support and care when mental health services changed or closed. Carers support more than one person and typically people with daily and high-level needs. Caring levels increased from 26-h to an average of 40-h a week of support provision, with changed roles and increased complexity. Heightened demands became stress-inducing to the point of mental ill health and suicidality for some family carers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Government policy and pandemic responses failed to address the financial, practical or emotional resources needed to fulfil the role of care provision and support to unwell and extremely distressed people with new or ongoing mental and psychological ill-health.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>From its inception, this project was co-produced and co-designed with mental health family carers and service users based on their expertise in understanding their experiences and ways to best explore these to the benefit and wellbeing of families in distress. The academic research partners both have active experience of supporting people with mental health challenges. Through each of the identified phases, lived experience expertise (family carers and service users) co-designed and co-facilitated the process. At times leading the process, such as in recruitment strategies, and at other times acting as guides. Guidance was provided by lived experience expertise in reflecting upon the literature review to understand what had been researched internationally and what would be important to understand in Australia. The academic partners advised on the possible processes for data collection, and the lived experience experts decided on the methodology based on that advice. Both the focus group and survey questions were developed and scrutinised from the perspective of the service users and carers in the project team. Difficult conversations were handled with respect, service users within the project team gently addressed areas of enquiry that may suggest stigma or feed into societal stereotypes of people with mental health challenges. Carers were able to consider the wording of questions to still be able to address areas of concern including domestic violence within the family unit and suicide. Dissemination strategies were planned together with the carer and service user representatives being co-presenters at conferences. The report for submission to the National Mental Health Commission (Australia) was written and reviewed with all partners. A committee of service users and carers, alongside the academic partners, planned the launch of the report in August 2023. The co-authorship of peer-reviewed articles has included family carers and service users from the National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过对澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间精神健康家庭照护者的经历进行深入探讨,这项共同制作的研究确定了宣传、实践和政策影响方面的建议,以维护家庭照护者的福祉。政府强制实施的限制、服务可用性的改变以及进入医院的困难,导致了额外的焦虑、抑郁和更大的痛苦,尤其是对于在大流行之前就经历过心理健康挑战的人来说。全国心理健康消费者和照护者论坛与两位学术研究人员一起,旨在了解不同地理位置和不同社区的照护提供、痛苦程度、未满足的需求、提供支持的挑战和益处等方面的影响:本文报告了共同设计的家庭照护者经验混合方法探索性研究中的调查部分。项目指导小组与莫纳什大学 SWITCH 研究小组的两位学术研究人员合作,共同开发了涵盖 9 个领域的 71 个问题的在线调查:结果:当心理健康服务发生变化或关闭时,家庭照护者需要提供支持和护理。照护者支持的对象不止一人,通常是有日常需求和高层次需求的人。随着角色的变化和复杂程度的增加,照顾者每周提供的支持从 26 小时增加到平均 40 小时。对一些家庭照护者来说,不断增加的需求导致压力,甚至导致精神疾病和自杀:结论:政府的政策和大流行病应对措施未能解决为患有新的或持续的精神和心理疾病、身体不适和极度痛苦的人提供护理和支持所需的财政、实际或情感资源问题:患者或公众的贡献:从一开始,这个项目就是与精神健康家庭照护者和服务使用者共同制作和共同设计的,基于他们的专业知识,了解他们的经历,以及如何以最佳方式探索这些经历,使处于困境中的家庭受益并获得幸福。学术研究合作伙伴在支持精神健康挑战者方面都有着丰富的经验。在确定的每个阶段,生活经验专家(家庭照顾者和服务使用者)共同设计并共同促进了这一过程。他们时而领导整个过程,如招聘策略,时而充当指导者。生活经验专家在文献回顾中提供了指导,以了解国际上的研究内容以及在澳大利亚需要了解的重要内容。学术合作伙伴就可能的数据收集过程提供建议,生活经验专家则根据建议决定收集方法。焦点小组和调查问卷的问题都是从项目团队中的服务使用者和照顾者的角度来制定和审查的。项目团队中的服务使用者会以尊重的态度来处理困难的对话,并温和地处理那些可能暗示着污名化或助长社会对心理健康挑战者的刻板印象的调查领域。照顾者能够考虑问题的措辞,以便仍然能够解决包括家庭内部的家庭暴力和自杀在内的关切领域。与照顾者和服务使用者代表一起规划了传播战略,并在会议上共同发言。撰写并与所有合作伙伴一起审查了提交给国家心理健康委员会(澳大利亚)的报告。一个由服务使用者和照护者组成的委员会与学术合作伙伴一起,计划于 2023 年 8 月发布该报告。同行评审文章的共同作者包括来自全国心理健康消费者和照护者论坛的家庭照护者和服务使用者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Through an in-depth exploration of mental health family carers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, this co-produced study identified recommendations for advocacy, practice and policy implications to uphold family carer wellbeing. Government-enforced restrictions, changed service availability and difficulties accessing hospitals, led to additional anxiety, depression and elevated distress, especially for people experiencing mental health challenges before the pandemic. The National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum alongside two academic researchers aimed to discern the impact of care provision, levels of distress, unmet needs, challenges and benefits of providing support, across geographic locations and diverse communities.

Methods

This article reports on the survey component of a co-designed mixed-methods exploratory study of family carer experiences. A project steering group worked with two academic researchers, members of SWITCH Research Group, Monash University, to develop the 71-question online survey across 9-domains.

Results

Family carers were relied upon to provide support and care when mental health services changed or closed. Carers support more than one person and typically people with daily and high-level needs. Caring levels increased from 26-h to an average of 40-h a week of support provision, with changed roles and increased complexity. Heightened demands became stress-inducing to the point of mental ill health and suicidality for some family carers.

Conclusion

Government policy and pandemic responses failed to address the financial, practical or emotional resources needed to fulfil the role of care provision and support to unwell and extremely distressed people with new or ongoing mental and psychological ill-health.

Patient or Public Contribution

From its inception, this project was co-produced and co-designed with mental health family carers and service users based on their expertise in understanding their experiences and ways to best explore these to the benefit and wellbeing of families in distress. The academic research partners both have active experience of supporting people with mental health challenges. Through each of the identified phases, lived experience expertise (family carers and service users) co-designed and co-facilitated the process. At times leading the process, such as in recruitment strategies, and at other times acting as guides. Guidance was provided by lived experience expertise in reflecting upon the literature review to understand what had been researched internationally and what would be important to understand in Australia. The academic partners advised on the possible processes for data collection, and the lived experience experts decided on the methodology based on that advice. Both the focus group and survey questions were developed and scrutinised from the perspective of the service users and carers in the project team. Difficult conversations were handled with respect, service users within the project team gently addressed areas of enquiry that may suggest stigma or feed into societal stereotypes of people with mental health challenges. Carers were able to consider the wording of questions to still be able to address areas of concern including domestic violence within the family unit and suicide. Dissemination strategies were planned together with the carer and service user representatives being co-presenters at conferences. The report for submission to the National Mental Health Commission (Australia) was written and reviewed with all partners. A committee of service users and carers, alongside the academic partners, planned the launch of the report in August 2023. The co-authorship of peer-reviewed articles has included family carers and service users from the National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信