硬膜外穿刺技术对接受引产分娩镇痛的parous 妇女突破性疼痛管理的影响:回顾性队列研究

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Youhei Tsunoda, Makoto Osumi, Takashi Matsushima, Masashi Ishikawa, Shunji Suzuki
{"title":"硬膜外穿刺技术对接受引产分娩镇痛的parous 妇女突破性疼痛管理的影响:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Youhei Tsunoda, Makoto Osumi, Takashi Matsushima, Masashi Ishikawa, Shunji Suzuki","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effectiveness of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in managing breakthrough pain in parous women receiving labor analgesia during induced labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included term pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received treatment for breakthrough pain during labor. All participants underwent induced labor, and some parous women among them underwent DPE. The DPE technique consisted of placing an epidural catheter after dural puncture with a 27-gauge spinal needle. Eligible women were allocated into a DPE group and conventional epidural (CE) anesthesia group. Pain was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS), and a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus was administered when the NRS score was ≥3. Breakthrough pain was defined as an NRS score ≥3 during PCEA management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of rescue interventions in managing breakthrough pain, as determined by a reduction in pain intensity to an NRS score <3 before birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 55 parous women who received labor analgesia, 44 required additional rescue administration for breakthrough pain. Of the remaining women, 23 received DPE and 19 received CE anesthesia. The DPE group experienced significantly more effective relief of breakthrough pain before birth than did the CE group (DPE: 100%; CE: 68.4%; p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In parous women, DPE anesthesia was more effective than CE anesthesia in providing analgesia for breakthrough pain immediately before delivery during induced labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"91 5","pages":"426-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique on Management of Breakthrough Pain for Parous Women Receiving Labor Analgesia during Induced Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Youhei Tsunoda, Makoto Osumi, Takashi Matsushima, Masashi Ishikawa, Shunji Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effectiveness of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in managing breakthrough pain in parous women receiving labor analgesia during induced labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included term pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received treatment for breakthrough pain during labor. All participants underwent induced labor, and some parous women among them underwent DPE. The DPE technique consisted of placing an epidural catheter after dural puncture with a 27-gauge spinal needle. Eligible women were allocated into a DPE group and conventional epidural (CE) anesthesia group. Pain was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS), and a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus was administered when the NRS score was ≥3. Breakthrough pain was defined as an NRS score ≥3 during PCEA management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of rescue interventions in managing breakthrough pain, as determined by a reduction in pain intensity to an NRS score <3 before birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 55 parous women who received labor analgesia, 44 required additional rescue administration for breakthrough pain. Of the remaining women, 23 received DPE and 19 received CE anesthesia. The DPE group experienced significantly more effective relief of breakthrough pain before birth than did the CE group (DPE: 100%; CE: 68.4%; p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In parous women, DPE anesthesia was more effective than CE anesthesia in providing analgesia for breakthrough pain immediately before delivery during induced labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"volume\":\"91 5\",\"pages\":\"426-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了硬膜外穿刺技术对接受引产镇痛的准妈妈控制突破性疼痛的效果:本研究评估了硬膜外穿刺(DPE)技术在处理接受引产过程中分娩镇痛的准妈妈的突破性疼痛方面的有效性:这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了在分娩过程中因突破性疼痛而接受治疗的单胎足月孕妇。所有参与者均接受了引产,其中部分准妈妈接受了DPE。DPE 技术包括用 27 号脊髓穿刺针穿刺硬膜后置入硬膜外导管。符合条件的产妇被分为 DPE 组和传统硬膜外麻醉(CE)组。疼痛采用数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估,当NRS评分≥3分时给予患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)栓剂。在 PCEA 管理期间,NRS 评分≥3 分即为突破性疼痛。主要结果是抢救干预对控制突破性疼痛的疗效,即疼痛强度降低到 NRS 评分结果:在 55 位接受分娩镇痛的准妈妈中,44 位需要额外的抢救措施来缓解突破性疼痛。其余产妇中,23 人接受了 DPE,19 人接受了 CE 麻醉。DPE 组在分娩前有效缓解突破性疼痛的比例明显高于 CE 组(DPE:100%;CE:68.4%;P=0.005):结论:对于parous产妇,DPE麻醉比CE麻醉更有效地缓解引产过程中临产前的突破性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique on Management of Breakthrough Pain for Parous Women Receiving Labor Analgesia during Induced Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: This study assessed the effectiveness of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in managing breakthrough pain in parous women receiving labor analgesia during induced labor.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included term pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received treatment for breakthrough pain during labor. All participants underwent induced labor, and some parous women among them underwent DPE. The DPE technique consisted of placing an epidural catheter after dural puncture with a 27-gauge spinal needle. Eligible women were allocated into a DPE group and conventional epidural (CE) anesthesia group. Pain was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS), and a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus was administered when the NRS score was ≥3. Breakthrough pain was defined as an NRS score ≥3 during PCEA management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of rescue interventions in managing breakthrough pain, as determined by a reduction in pain intensity to an NRS score <3 before birth.

Results: Among the 55 parous women who received labor analgesia, 44 required additional rescue administration for breakthrough pain. Of the remaining women, 23 received DPE and 19 received CE anesthesia. The DPE group experienced significantly more effective relief of breakthrough pain before birth than did the CE group (DPE: 100%; CE: 68.4%; p=0.005).

Conclusion: In parous women, DPE anesthesia was more effective than CE anesthesia in providing analgesia for breakthrough pain immediately before delivery during induced labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nippon Medical School
Journal of Nippon Medical School MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信