治疗复发性尿路感染的膀胱内疗法:系统回顾

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72175
Dhruv Patel
{"title":"治疗复发性尿路感染的膀胱内疗法:系统回顾","authors":"Dhruv Patel","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) present a significant clinical challenge, particularly due to the associated overuse of antibiotics and the rise in antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review evaluates the current literature on the use of intravesical therapies as an alternative treatment for rUTIs. Two established primary therapies are reviewed: glycosaminoglycan (GAG) instillations and intravesical antibiotic instillations. Both therapies offer localised treatment, reducing systemic antibiotic exposure and targeting infection sites more directly. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), yielding 5,963 relevant articles, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review indicates that both GAG and antibiotic instillations significantly reduce UTI recurrence rates and improve symptoms such as pain and urinary urgency. However, significant variations in treatment schedules and dosages exist, and no direct comparative studies between GAG instillations and intravesical antibiotics were found. Moreover, intravesical antibiotics show great potential in minimising antimicrobial resistance, though further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. While intravesical therapies are generally well-tolerated, GAG instillations can cause mild irritation. Further research is required to optimise therapy regimens and to perform cost-benefit analyses, particularly considering the high costs of these therapies compared to traditional antibiotic prophylaxis. Randomised controlled trials comparing different intravesical treatments are crucial to inform future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravesical Therapies for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Dhruv Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.72175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) present a significant clinical challenge, particularly due to the associated overuse of antibiotics and the rise in antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review evaluates the current literature on the use of intravesical therapies as an alternative treatment for rUTIs. Two established primary therapies are reviewed: glycosaminoglycan (GAG) instillations and intravesical antibiotic instillations. Both therapies offer localised treatment, reducing systemic antibiotic exposure and targeting infection sites more directly. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), yielding 5,963 relevant articles, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review indicates that both GAG and antibiotic instillations significantly reduce UTI recurrence rates and improve symptoms such as pain and urinary urgency. However, significant variations in treatment schedules and dosages exist, and no direct comparative studies between GAG instillations and intravesical antibiotics were found. Moreover, intravesical antibiotics show great potential in minimising antimicrobial resistance, though further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. While intravesical therapies are generally well-tolerated, GAG instillations can cause mild irritation. Further research is required to optimise therapy regimens and to perform cost-benefit analyses, particularly considering the high costs of these therapies compared to traditional antibiotic prophylaxis. Randomised controlled trials comparing different intravesical treatments are crucial to inform future clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发性尿路感染(rUTIs)是一项重大的临床挑战,特别是由于相关抗生素的过度使用和抗菌药耐药性的增加。这篇系统性综述评估了目前使用膀胱内疗法作为复发性尿路感染替代疗法的文献。综述了两种已确立的主要疗法:糖胺聚糖(GAG)灌注和膀胱内抗生素灌注。这两种疗法都能提供局部治疗,减少全身抗生素暴露,更直接地针对感染部位。我们使用 PubMed 和科克伦对照试验登记中心 (CENTRAL) 进行了文献检索,共检索到 5963 篇相关文章,其中有 7 项研究符合纳入标准。综述显示,GAG 和抗生素注射都能显著降低 UTI 复发率,改善疼痛和尿急等症状。然而,治疗方案和剂量存在很大差异,而且没有发现 GAG 灌注和膀胱内注射抗生素之间的直接比较研究。此外,膀胱内注射抗生素在减少抗菌药耐药性方面显示出巨大的潜力,但还需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这些发现。虽然膀胱内注射疗法一般耐受性良好,但 GAG 注射可能会引起轻微刺激。需要进一步开展研究,以优化治疗方案并进行成本效益分析,特别是考虑到与传统的抗生素预防疗法相比,这些疗法的成本较高。比较不同膀胱内治疗方法的随机对照试验对于指导未来的临床实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravesical Therapies for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review.

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) present a significant clinical challenge, particularly due to the associated overuse of antibiotics and the rise in antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review evaluates the current literature on the use of intravesical therapies as an alternative treatment for rUTIs. Two established primary therapies are reviewed: glycosaminoglycan (GAG) instillations and intravesical antibiotic instillations. Both therapies offer localised treatment, reducing systemic antibiotic exposure and targeting infection sites more directly. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), yielding 5,963 relevant articles, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The review indicates that both GAG and antibiotic instillations significantly reduce UTI recurrence rates and improve symptoms such as pain and urinary urgency. However, significant variations in treatment schedules and dosages exist, and no direct comparative studies between GAG instillations and intravesical antibiotics were found. Moreover, intravesical antibiotics show great potential in minimising antimicrobial resistance, though further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. While intravesical therapies are generally well-tolerated, GAG instillations can cause mild irritation. Further research is required to optimise therapy regimens and to perform cost-benefit analyses, particularly considering the high costs of these therapies compared to traditional antibiotic prophylaxis. Randomised controlled trials comparing different intravesical treatments are crucial to inform future clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信