ACDF 期间笼板植入难易度与终板 Hounsfield 单位值之间的相关性:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Guozheng Jiang, Luchun Xu, Yongdong Yang, Jianbin Guan, Yukun Ma, Ningning Feng, Ziye Qiu, Zeyu Li, Guanlong Wang, Jiaojiao Fan, Yi Qu, Xing Yu
{"title":"ACDF 期间笼板植入难易度与终板 Hounsfield 单位值之间的相关性:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Guozheng Jiang, Luchun Xu, Yongdong Yang, Jianbin Guan, Yukun Ma, Ningning Feng, Ziye Qiu, Zeyu Li, Guanlong Wang, Jiaojiao Fan, Yi Qu, Xing Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02649-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the correlation between the implantation status of the ROI-C cervical cage plates and the Hounsfield unit(HU) value of the target vertebral endplate during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF)surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review of patient data undergoing ACDF from January 2018 to December 2021. Data on gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, cervical cage plates status, and HU values of the cervical vertebral endplate. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the HU values and the plates status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 cases (12.1%) had misplaced implants during surgery. There were statistical differences in gender, long-term smoking history, drinking history, and cervical vertebral endplate HU values between the abnormal implantation group and the normal implantation group (P < 0.05). The cervical vertebral endplate HU values in the abnormal implantation group were significantly higher than those in the normal implantation group (729.3 ± 36.2 HU vs. 484.4 ± 59.2 HU, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, cervical endplate HU value (OR 1.081; 95% CI 1.016-1.375) was an independent factor influencing improper plate implantation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the cervical endplate HU value in predicting implantation difficulty was 0.836 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold of 724 HU (sensitivity 83.2%; specificity 90.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cervical vertebral segment endplate HU value can independently predict whether the implantation of the plates is misplaced during ACDF surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the ease of cage plates implantation and endplate Hounsfield unit value during ACDF: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Guozheng Jiang, Luchun Xu, Yongdong Yang, Jianbin Guan, Yukun Ma, Ningning Feng, Ziye Qiu, Zeyu Li, Guanlong Wang, Jiaojiao Fan, Yi Qu, Xing Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02649-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the correlation between the implantation status of the ROI-C cervical cage plates and the Hounsfield unit(HU) value of the target vertebral endplate during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF)surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review of patient data undergoing ACDF from January 2018 to December 2021. Data on gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, cervical cage plates status, and HU values of the cervical vertebral endplate. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the HU values and the plates status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 cases (12.1%) had misplaced implants during surgery. There were statistical differences in gender, long-term smoking history, drinking history, and cervical vertebral endplate HU values between the abnormal implantation group and the normal implantation group (P < 0.05). The cervical vertebral endplate HU values in the abnormal implantation group were significantly higher than those in the normal implantation group (729.3 ± 36.2 HU vs. 484.4 ± 59.2 HU, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, cervical endplate HU value (OR 1.081; 95% CI 1.016-1.375) was an independent factor influencing improper plate implantation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the cervical endplate HU value in predicting implantation difficulty was 0.836 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold of 724 HU (sensitivity 83.2%; specificity 90.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cervical vertebral segment endplate HU value can independently predict whether the implantation of the plates is misplaced during ACDF surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02649-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02649-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)手术中ROI-C颈椎笼钢板植入状态与目标椎体终板Hounsfield单位(HU)值之间的相关性:回顾2018年1月至2021年12月接受ACDF手术的患者数据。性别、年龄、体重指数、高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症病史、吸烟、饮酒、颈椎笼钢板状态、颈椎椎体终板HU值等数据。采用逻辑回归分析评估 HU 值与椎板状态之间的关系:结果:共有 17 例(12.1%)患者在手术过程中出现植入物错位。异常植入组与正常植入组在性别、长期吸烟史、饮酒史、颈椎椎体终板 HU 值等方面存在统计学差异(P 结论:异常植入组与正常植入组在颈椎椎体终板 HU 值等方面存在统计学差异:颈椎节段终板 HU 值可独立预测 ACDF 手术中钢板植入是否错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between the ease of cage plates implantation and endplate Hounsfield unit value during ACDF: a retrospective study.

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the implantation status of the ROI-C cervical cage plates and the Hounsfield unit(HU) value of the target vertebral endplate during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF)surgery.

Methods: Review of patient data undergoing ACDF from January 2018 to December 2021. Data on gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, cervical cage plates status, and HU values of the cervical vertebral endplate. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the HU values and the plates status.

Results: A total of 17 cases (12.1%) had misplaced implants during surgery. There were statistical differences in gender, long-term smoking history, drinking history, and cervical vertebral endplate HU values between the abnormal implantation group and the normal implantation group (P < 0.05). The cervical vertebral endplate HU values in the abnormal implantation group were significantly higher than those in the normal implantation group (729.3 ± 36.2 HU vs. 484.4 ± 59.2 HU, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, cervical endplate HU value (OR 1.081; 95% CI 1.016-1.375) was an independent factor influencing improper plate implantation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the cervical endplate HU value in predicting implantation difficulty was 0.836 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold of 724 HU (sensitivity 83.2%; specificity 90.4%).

Conclusions: The cervical vertebral segment endplate HU value can independently predict whether the implantation of the plates is misplaced during ACDF surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信