关于尼泊尔临床实验室质量控制和方法评估实践的试点调查。

Q2 Medicine
Vivek Pant, Tze Ping Loh, Santosh Pradhan, Keyoor Gautam, Devish Pyakurel
{"title":"关于尼泊尔临床实验室质量控制和方法评估实践的试点调查。","authors":"Vivek Pant, Tze Ping Loh, Santosh Pradhan, Keyoor Gautam, Devish Pyakurel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of systematic collection of information on the quality control practice and method evaluation approach in clinical laboratories in Nepal. Such data is important to formulate educational activities and policy that may address any potential knowledge and practice gap identified.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The pilot survey included twelve questions regarding quality control practice and method evaluation approach and was distributed among the laboratory medicine professionals in Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected using a structured self-reported questionnaire on the Google Docs platform. A total of 43 responses were received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal quality control and method evaluation practice varied considerably in terms of the number of levels of material used, frequency of analysis, type and source of material and acceptance criteria among responding laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in quality control practice and method evaluation approach highlights need for augmentation of knowledge, attitude, and practice behavior among laboratory professionals in Nepal.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"35 3","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Survey on Quality Control and Method Evaluation Practices in Clinical Laboratories in Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Pant, Tze Ping Loh, Santosh Pradhan, Keyoor Gautam, Devish Pyakurel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of systematic collection of information on the quality control practice and method evaluation approach in clinical laboratories in Nepal. Such data is important to formulate educational activities and policy that may address any potential knowledge and practice gap identified.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The pilot survey included twelve questions regarding quality control practice and method evaluation approach and was distributed among the laboratory medicine professionals in Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected using a structured self-reported questionnaire on the Google Docs platform. A total of 43 responses were received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal quality control and method evaluation practice varied considerably in terms of the number of levels of material used, frequency of analysis, type and source of material and acceptance criteria among responding laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in quality control practice and method evaluation approach highlights need for augmentation of knowledge, attitude, and practice behavior among laboratory professionals in Nepal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"166-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536274/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺乏对尼泊尔临床实验室质量控制实践和方法评估方法的系统性信息收集。这些数据对制定教育活动和政策非常重要,可以弥补潜在的知识和实践差距:试点调查包括有关质量控制实践和方法评估方法的 12 个问题,调查对象为尼泊尔加德满都的实验室医学专业人员。数据收集采用了谷歌文档平台上的结构化自我报告问卷。共收到 43 份回复:结果:内部质量控制和方法评估实践在所使用材料的等级数量、分析频率、材料类型和来源以及验收标准等方面存在很大差异:质量控制实践和方法评估方法的差异凸显了尼泊尔实验室专业人员在知识、态度和实践行为方面需要加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Survey on Quality Control and Method Evaluation Practices in Clinical Laboratories in Nepal.

Background: There is a lack of systematic collection of information on the quality control practice and method evaluation approach in clinical laboratories in Nepal. Such data is important to formulate educational activities and policy that may address any potential knowledge and practice gap identified.

Method: The pilot survey included twelve questions regarding quality control practice and method evaluation approach and was distributed among the laboratory medicine professionals in Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected using a structured self-reported questionnaire on the Google Docs platform. A total of 43 responses were received.

Results: Internal quality control and method evaluation practice varied considerably in terms of the number of levels of material used, frequency of analysis, type and source of material and acceptance criteria among responding laboratories.

Conclusion: The variability in quality control practice and method evaluation approach highlights need for augmentation of knowledge, attitude, and practice behavior among laboratory professionals in Nepal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信