负强化后的持续威胁回避与状态焦虑升高无关。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
E A Crummy, B L Chamberlain, J P Gamboa, J L Pierson, S E Ahmari
{"title":"负强化后的持续威胁回避与状态焦虑升高无关。","authors":"E A Crummy, B L Chamberlain, J P Gamboa, J L Pierson, S E Ahmari","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness consisting of obsessions and compulsions. OCD severity and treatment response are correlated with avoidant behaviors thought be performed to alleviate obsession-related anxiety. However, little is known about either the role of avoidance in the development of OCD or the interplay between anxiety states and avoidance behaviors. We have developed an instrumental negative reinforcement (i.e. active avoidance) paradigm in which mice must lever-press to avoid upcoming foot shocks. We show that mice (both sexes) can learn this task with high acquisition rates (75%) and that this behavior is largely stable when introducing uncertainty and modifying task structure. Furthermore, mice continue to perform avoidance responses on trials where lever pressing is not reinforced and increase response rates as they are maintained on this paradigm. With this paradigm, we did not find a relationship between negative reinforcement history and anxiety-related behaviors in well-established anxiety assays. Finally, we performed exploratory analyses to identify candidate regions involved in well-trained negative reinforcement using expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos. We detected correlated c-Fos expression in 1) cortico-striatal regions which regulate active avoidance in other paradigms and 2) amygdala circuits known to regulate conditioned defensive behaviors.<b>Significance Statement</b> Studies in patients with OCD suggest that compulsions are performed to avoid perceived threats and modulate anxiety tied to obsessions and/or compulsions. The negative reinforcement of avoidance and alleviated anxiety could therefore be a key driver of compulsive behaviors. However, there are still outstanding questions concerning the relationship between these two behaviors and the neural circuits involved in mediating negative reinforcement. We have developed an operant negative reinforcement paradigm in mice with discrete avoid and escape behaviors that can be learned without prior reward training with high throughput (75% acquisition) with responding that persists during nonreinforced trials. However, no differences were observed between negative reinforcement vs. unshocked and inescapably shocked controls, suggesting that continued negative reinforcement did not impact anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent threat avoidance following negative reinforcement is not associated with elevated state anxiety.\",\"authors\":\"E A Crummy, B L Chamberlain, J P Gamboa, J L Pierson, S E Ahmari\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness consisting of obsessions and compulsions. OCD severity and treatment response are correlated with avoidant behaviors thought be performed to alleviate obsession-related anxiety. However, little is known about either the role of avoidance in the development of OCD or the interplay between anxiety states and avoidance behaviors. We have developed an instrumental negative reinforcement (i.e. active avoidance) paradigm in which mice must lever-press to avoid upcoming foot shocks. We show that mice (both sexes) can learn this task with high acquisition rates (75%) and that this behavior is largely stable when introducing uncertainty and modifying task structure. Furthermore, mice continue to perform avoidance responses on trials where lever pressing is not reinforced and increase response rates as they are maintained on this paradigm. With this paradigm, we did not find a relationship between negative reinforcement history and anxiety-related behaviors in well-established anxiety assays. Finally, we performed exploratory analyses to identify candidate regions involved in well-trained negative reinforcement using expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos. We detected correlated c-Fos expression in 1) cortico-striatal regions which regulate active avoidance in other paradigms and 2) amygdala circuits known to regulate conditioned defensive behaviors.<b>Significance Statement</b> Studies in patients with OCD suggest that compulsions are performed to avoid perceived threats and modulate anxiety tied to obsessions and/or compulsions. The negative reinforcement of avoidance and alleviated anxiety could therefore be a key driver of compulsive behaviors. However, there are still outstanding questions concerning the relationship between these two behaviors and the neural circuits involved in mediating negative reinforcement. We have developed an operant negative reinforcement paradigm in mice with discrete avoid and escape behaviors that can be learned without prior reward training with high throughput (75% acquisition) with responding that persists during nonreinforced trials. However, no differences were observed between negative reinforcement vs. unshocked and inescapably shocked controls, suggesting that continued negative reinforcement did not impact anxiety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强迫症(OCD)是一种由强迫观念和强迫行为组成的使人衰弱的疾病。强迫症的严重程度和治疗反应与回避行为有关,回避行为被认为是为了减轻与强迫症相关的焦虑。然而,人们对回避在强迫症发展过程中的作用或焦虑状态与回避行为之间的相互作用知之甚少。我们开发了一种工具性负强化(即主动回避)范例,在该范例中,小鼠必须通过按压杠杆来避免即将到来的脚震。我们的研究表明,小鼠(雌雄均可)能以较高的习得率(75%)学会这项任务,而且当引入不确定性和改变任务结构时,这种行为在很大程度上是稳定的。此外,小鼠在不强化按压杠杆的试验中会继续做出回避反应,并且在该范式中的反应率会不断提高。通过这种范式,我们在成熟的焦虑试验中没有发现负强化历史与焦虑相关行为之间的关系。最后,我们利用即时早期基因 c-Fos 的表达进行了探索性分析,以确定参与训练有素的负强化的候选区域。我们在以下两个区域检测到了相关的 c-Fos 表达:1)在其他范式中调节主动回避的皮质纹状体区域;2)已知调节条件性防御行为的杏仁核回路。因此,回避和减轻焦虑的负强化可能是强迫行为的主要驱动力。然而,关于这两种行为之间的关系以及介导负强化的神经回路,仍然存在悬而未决的问题。我们在小鼠中开发了一种操作性负强化范式,该范式具有离散的回避和逃避行为,无需事先进行奖赏训练即可学习,且学习效率高(75% 的习得率),反应在非强化试验期间持续存在。然而,在负强化与未电击和不可避免电击的对照组之间没有观察到差异,这表明持续的负强化不会影响焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistent threat avoidance following negative reinforcement is not associated with elevated state anxiety.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness consisting of obsessions and compulsions. OCD severity and treatment response are correlated with avoidant behaviors thought be performed to alleviate obsession-related anxiety. However, little is known about either the role of avoidance in the development of OCD or the interplay between anxiety states and avoidance behaviors. We have developed an instrumental negative reinforcement (i.e. active avoidance) paradigm in which mice must lever-press to avoid upcoming foot shocks. We show that mice (both sexes) can learn this task with high acquisition rates (75%) and that this behavior is largely stable when introducing uncertainty and modifying task structure. Furthermore, mice continue to perform avoidance responses on trials where lever pressing is not reinforced and increase response rates as they are maintained on this paradigm. With this paradigm, we did not find a relationship between negative reinforcement history and anxiety-related behaviors in well-established anxiety assays. Finally, we performed exploratory analyses to identify candidate regions involved in well-trained negative reinforcement using expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos. We detected correlated c-Fos expression in 1) cortico-striatal regions which regulate active avoidance in other paradigms and 2) amygdala circuits known to regulate conditioned defensive behaviors.Significance Statement Studies in patients with OCD suggest that compulsions are performed to avoid perceived threats and modulate anxiety tied to obsessions and/or compulsions. The negative reinforcement of avoidance and alleviated anxiety could therefore be a key driver of compulsive behaviors. However, there are still outstanding questions concerning the relationship between these two behaviors and the neural circuits involved in mediating negative reinforcement. We have developed an operant negative reinforcement paradigm in mice with discrete avoid and escape behaviors that can be learned without prior reward training with high throughput (75% acquisition) with responding that persists during nonreinforced trials. However, no differences were observed between negative reinforcement vs. unshocked and inescapably shocked controls, suggesting that continued negative reinforcement did not impact anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信