通过 COVID-19 大流行追踪镰状细胞病患者的远程保健需求:横断面调查研究。

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marsha Treadwell, Lisa Du, Yemi Lawrence, Maxine Gaspar, Kathryn Hassell, Sanjay Shah, Moses Akpan, Nicole Crook, Marcia Taylor, Srila Gopal, For the Pacific Sickle Cell Regional Collaborative
{"title":"通过 COVID-19 大流行追踪镰状细胞病患者的远程保健需求:横断面调查研究。","authors":"Marsha Treadwell,&nbsp;Lisa Du,&nbsp;Yemi Lawrence,&nbsp;Maxine Gaspar,&nbsp;Kathryn Hassell,&nbsp;Sanjay Shah,&nbsp;Moses Akpan,&nbsp;Nicole Crook,&nbsp;Marcia Taylor,&nbsp;Srila Gopal,&nbsp;For the Pacific Sickle Cell Regional Collaborative","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Pervasive disparities characterize sickle cell disease (SCD) care, including limited access to SCD specialists. Rapid deployment of remote healthcare provision and support during the COVID-19 pandemic provides an opportunity to understand telehealth barriers/facilitators for SCD. We aimed to evaluate telehealth experiences and satisfaction for routine visits among adults and caregivers of children with SCD within a US regional collaborative.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>151 adults ≥ 18 [median (IQR) = 36 (28, 43) years], and 94 caregivers [median child age (IQR) = 12 (7, 14) years] completed a 30-item online survey in 2021 assessing systems issues such as reliable Internet; health information sharing; and consumer focus (e.g., visit started on time). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate relations between independent variables and the outcome overall satisfaction with telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were primarily diagnosed with sickle cell anemia (60.8%) and prescribed hydroxyurea (57.6%). Satisfaction with telehealth was high (&gt; 90%), but 60.6% of caregivers gave the highest rating compared with 44.9% of adults (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Few accessibility/technical issues were cited, however, caregivers reported more often having home support for telehealth (80.9% vs. 63.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, participants seen in large centers (&gt; 200) were more likely to give the highest satisfaction ratings compared with those in smaller centers (&lt; 100, aOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.21, 4.48, <i>p</i> = 0.01); however, those who needed help from a telehealth navigator were less likely to give the highest telehealth experience rating versus those who did not need help (aOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.71, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Views of telehealth were favorable, although caregivers reported greater satisfaction and resources compared with adults with SCD. It remains important to identify factors related to telehealth utilization and efficacy for SCD populations in varied geographies and settings, to ensure equity in access.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking Telehealth Needs for Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study\",\"authors\":\"Marsha Treadwell,&nbsp;Lisa Du,&nbsp;Yemi Lawrence,&nbsp;Maxine Gaspar,&nbsp;Kathryn Hassell,&nbsp;Sanjay Shah,&nbsp;Moses Akpan,&nbsp;Nicole Crook,&nbsp;Marcia Taylor,&nbsp;Srila Gopal,&nbsp;For the Pacific Sickle Cell Regional Collaborative\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pervasive disparities characterize sickle cell disease (SCD) care, including limited access to SCD specialists. Rapid deployment of remote healthcare provision and support during the COVID-19 pandemic provides an opportunity to understand telehealth barriers/facilitators for SCD. We aimed to evaluate telehealth experiences and satisfaction for routine visits among adults and caregivers of children with SCD within a US regional collaborative.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>151 adults ≥ 18 [median (IQR) = 36 (28, 43) years], and 94 caregivers [median child age (IQR) = 12 (7, 14) years] completed a 30-item online survey in 2021 assessing systems issues such as reliable Internet; health information sharing; and consumer focus (e.g., visit started on time). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate relations between independent variables and the outcome overall satisfaction with telehealth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients were primarily diagnosed with sickle cell anemia (60.8%) and prescribed hydroxyurea (57.6%). Satisfaction with telehealth was high (&gt; 90%), but 60.6% of caregivers gave the highest rating compared with 44.9% of adults (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Few accessibility/technical issues were cited, however, caregivers reported more often having home support for telehealth (80.9% vs. 63.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, participants seen in large centers (&gt; 200) were more likely to give the highest satisfaction ratings compared with those in smaller centers (&lt; 100, aOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.21, 4.48, <i>p</i> = 0.01); however, those who needed help from a telehealth navigator were less likely to give the highest telehealth experience rating versus those who did not need help (aOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.71, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Views of telehealth were favorable, although caregivers reported greater satisfaction and resources compared with adults with SCD. It remains important to identify factors related to telehealth utilization and efficacy for SCD populations in varied geographies and settings, to ensure equity in access.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:镰状细胞病 (SCD) 护理中普遍存在不平等现象,包括获得 SCD 专家治疗的机会有限。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗服务和支持的快速部署为了解 SCD 的远程医疗障碍/促进因素提供了机会。方法:151 名年龄≥ 18 岁的成年人[中位数(IQR)= 36 (28, 43)岁]和 94 名照顾者[中位数儿童年龄(IQR)= 12 (7, 14)岁]在 2021 年完成了一项包含 30 个项目的在线调查,评估系统问题,如可靠的互联网、健康信息共享和消费者关注点(如按时就诊)。采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估自变量与远程医疗总体满意度结果之间的关系:患者主要被诊断为镰状细胞性贫血(60.8%),处方为羟基脲(57.6%)。对远程医疗的满意度很高(> 90%),但 60.6% 的护理人员给予了最高评价,而成人仅为 44.9%(p = 0.02)。很少有人提到远程医疗的可及性/技术问题,但护理人员表示远程医疗更经常得到家庭支持(80.9% 对 63.6%,p = 0.003)。在多变量分析中,在大型中心(大于 200 人)就诊的参与者与在小型中心就诊的参与者相比,更有可能给出最高满意度评分(p = 0.01);然而,与不需要帮助的参与者相比,需要远程医疗导航员帮助的参与者给出最高远程医疗体验评分的可能性较低(aOR:0.37;95% CI:0.19,0.71,p = 0.003):尽管与 SCD 成人相比,护理人员报告了更高的满意度和更多的资源,但他们对远程医疗的看法是积极的。确定不同地区和环境中 SCD 患者使用远程医疗的相关因素和疗效,以确保使用的公平性,仍然非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking Telehealth Needs for Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Background and Aim

Pervasive disparities characterize sickle cell disease (SCD) care, including limited access to SCD specialists. Rapid deployment of remote healthcare provision and support during the COVID-19 pandemic provides an opportunity to understand telehealth barriers/facilitators for SCD. We aimed to evaluate telehealth experiences and satisfaction for routine visits among adults and caregivers of children with SCD within a US regional collaborative.

Methods

151 adults ≥ 18 [median (IQR) = 36 (28, 43) years], and 94 caregivers [median child age (IQR) = 12 (7, 14) years] completed a 30-item online survey in 2021 assessing systems issues such as reliable Internet; health information sharing; and consumer focus (e.g., visit started on time). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate relations between independent variables and the outcome overall satisfaction with telehealth.

Results

Patients were primarily diagnosed with sickle cell anemia (60.8%) and prescribed hydroxyurea (57.6%). Satisfaction with telehealth was high (> 90%), but 60.6% of caregivers gave the highest rating compared with 44.9% of adults (p = 0.02). Few accessibility/technical issues were cited, however, caregivers reported more often having home support for telehealth (80.9% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, participants seen in large centers (> 200) were more likely to give the highest satisfaction ratings compared with those in smaller centers (< 100, aOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.21, 4.48, p = 0.01); however, those who needed help from a telehealth navigator were less likely to give the highest telehealth experience rating versus those who did not need help (aOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.71, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Views of telehealth were favorable, although caregivers reported greater satisfaction and resources compared with adults with SCD. It remains important to identify factors related to telehealth utilization and efficacy for SCD populations in varied geographies and settings, to ensure equity in access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信