建立自己的全虚拟多学科肾结石诊所。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-248
Michael Lin-Brande, Celia Janoff, Tyler Chase, Raghav Wusirika, Brian Duty, Ian Metzler
{"title":"建立自己的全虚拟多学科肾结石诊所。","authors":"Michael Lin-Brande, Celia Janoff, Tyler Chase, Raghav Wusirika, Brian Duty, Ian Metzler","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the dramatic rise of telemedicine in the post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our objective was to develop a totally virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic and assess patient satisfaction of this format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The virtual multidisciplinary stone clinic began July 2021 and continued monthly. Prior to the beginning of each clinic, providers from the urology, nephrology, and dietitian teams meet virtually to discuss the patients. Patients would then log into WebEx virtual platform and providers would subsequently log into the patient's virtual room, to review radiology, laboratory results, and dietary logs then provide counseling. Patients were then sent a survey via electronic mail regarding their experience. A 5-point Likert scale was used for responses ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Scores were averaged to rank results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were sent surveys, and a total of 31 surveys were completed. Sixty-one percent of patients strongly agree and 13% agree that they felt comfortable using the virtual platform. When asked if they prefer using the virtual platform for their visit, 70% of patients agreed or strongly agreed and only 16% of patients disagreed or strongly disagreed. In regards to potential advantages of a virtual visit, the Likert scores were averaged and ranked from most to least important with improved timeliness (3.7) and ease of scheduling into day (3.6) the highest rated advantages. Most patients did not find any concerns using the virtual platform, however the ability to see the provider in-person and connecting personally was of highest concern with an average Likert score of 2.3. Overall, 83% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the multidisciplinary stone clinic satisfied their kidney stone related questions regarding treatment and prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic can be implemented with high patient satisfaction scores and help overcome the limitations of physical clinic space and provider schedule coordination. There are few disadvantages to using the platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 10","pages":"2174-2179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Build your own all-virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lin-Brande, Celia Janoff, Tyler Chase, Raghav Wusirika, Brian Duty, Ian Metzler\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-24-248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the dramatic rise of telemedicine in the post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our objective was to develop a totally virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic and assess patient satisfaction of this format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The virtual multidisciplinary stone clinic began July 2021 and continued monthly. Prior to the beginning of each clinic, providers from the urology, nephrology, and dietitian teams meet virtually to discuss the patients. Patients would then log into WebEx virtual platform and providers would subsequently log into the patient's virtual room, to review radiology, laboratory results, and dietary logs then provide counseling. Patients were then sent a survey via electronic mail regarding their experience. A 5-point Likert scale was used for responses ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Scores were averaged to rank results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were sent surveys, and a total of 31 surveys were completed. Sixty-one percent of patients strongly agree and 13% agree that they felt comfortable using the virtual platform. When asked if they prefer using the virtual platform for their visit, 70% of patients agreed or strongly agreed and only 16% of patients disagreed or strongly disagreed. In regards to potential advantages of a virtual visit, the Likert scores were averaged and ranked from most to least important with improved timeliness (3.7) and ease of scheduling into day (3.6) the highest rated advantages. Most patients did not find any concerns using the virtual platform, however the ability to see the provider in-person and connecting personally was of highest concern with an average Likert score of 2.3. Overall, 83% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the multidisciplinary stone clinic satisfied their kidney stone related questions regarding treatment and prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic can be implemented with high patient satisfaction scores and help overcome the limitations of physical clinic space and provider schedule coordination. There are few disadvantages to using the platform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"2174-2179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行后远程医疗的急剧兴起,我们的目标是开发一个完全虚拟的多学科肾结石门诊,并评估患者对这种形式的满意度:虚拟多学科结石门诊于 2021 年 7 月开始,每月持续进行。每次门诊开始前,来自泌尿科、肾脏科和营养师团队的医疗人员会召开虚拟会议,讨论患者情况。患者随后会登录 WebEx 虚拟平台,医疗服务提供者随后会登录患者的虚拟房间,查看放射学、实验室结果和饮食日志,然后提供咨询服务。然后通过电子邮件向患者发送有关其体验的调查问卷。调查采用 5 点李克特量表,从 "非常不同意 "到 "非常同意 "不等。结果:共向 122 名患者发送了调查问卷,其中 31 份调查问卷已完成。61%的患者非常同意,13%的患者同意他们在使用虚拟平台时感到舒适。当被问及是否喜欢使用虚拟平台就诊时,70% 的患者表示同意或非常同意,只有 16% 的患者表示不同意或非常不同意。关于虚拟就诊的潜在优势,对 Likert 分数进行了平均,并从最重要到最不重要进行了排序,其中及时性提高(3.7 分)和易于安排就诊时间(3.6 分)是评分最高的优势。大多数患者对使用虚拟平台没有任何顾虑,但对能否见到医疗服务提供者和进行个人交流最为关注,平均 Likert 得分为 2.3。总体而言,83% 的患者同意或非常同意多学科结石诊所满足了他们与肾结石有关的治疗和预防问题:虚拟多学科肾结石门诊的实施可获得较高的患者满意度,并有助于克服实体门诊空间和医疗服务提供者日程协调的限制。使用该平台的缺点很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Build your own all-virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic.

Background: With the dramatic rise of telemedicine in the post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our objective was to develop a totally virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic and assess patient satisfaction of this format.

Methods: The virtual multidisciplinary stone clinic began July 2021 and continued monthly. Prior to the beginning of each clinic, providers from the urology, nephrology, and dietitian teams meet virtually to discuss the patients. Patients would then log into WebEx virtual platform and providers would subsequently log into the patient's virtual room, to review radiology, laboratory results, and dietary logs then provide counseling. Patients were then sent a survey via electronic mail regarding their experience. A 5-point Likert scale was used for responses ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Scores were averaged to rank results.

Results: A total of 122 patients were sent surveys, and a total of 31 surveys were completed. Sixty-one percent of patients strongly agree and 13% agree that they felt comfortable using the virtual platform. When asked if they prefer using the virtual platform for their visit, 70% of patients agreed or strongly agreed and only 16% of patients disagreed or strongly disagreed. In regards to potential advantages of a virtual visit, the Likert scores were averaged and ranked from most to least important with improved timeliness (3.7) and ease of scheduling into day (3.6) the highest rated advantages. Most patients did not find any concerns using the virtual platform, however the ability to see the provider in-person and connecting personally was of highest concern with an average Likert score of 2.3. Overall, 83% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the multidisciplinary stone clinic satisfied their kidney stone related questions regarding treatment and prevention.

Conclusions: A virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic can be implemented with high patient satisfaction scores and help overcome the limitations of physical clinic space and provider schedule coordination. There are few disadvantages to using the platform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信