Yoshiya Tanaka, Tsukasa Matsubara, Tatsuya Atsumi, Koichi Amano, Naoki Ishiguro, Shintaro Hirata, Kunihiro Yamaoka, Bernard G Combe, Peter Nash, Mark Genovese, Alena Pechonkina, Jie Liu, Akira Kondo, Haruhiko Fukada, Francesco De Leonardis, Tsutomu Takeuchi
{"title":"日本类风湿关节炎患者服用非戈替尼的安全性和有效性：FINCH 4第156周中期结果。","authors":"Yoshiya Tanaka, Tsukasa Matsubara, Tatsuya Atsumi, Koichi Amano, Naoki Ishiguro, Shintaro Hirata, Kunihiro Yamaoka, Bernard G Combe, Peter Nash, Mark Genovese, Alena Pechonkina, Jie Liu, Akira Kondo, Haruhiko Fukada, Francesco De Leonardis, Tsutomu Takeuchi","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe safety and efficacy of filgotinib 200 or 100 mg (FIL200/FIL100) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a long-term extension (LTE; NCT03025308).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who completed any of three parent studies (NCT02889796: inadequate response [IR] to methotrexate [MTX]; NCT02873936: IR to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; NCT02886728: MTX-naïve) without rescue therapy could enter the LTE; patients taking FIL continued their dosage, and those who received comparators were rerandomised to FIL200 or FIL100. This analysis includes week 156 interim results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among Japanese patients, 110 received FIL200, and 97 received FIL100. Mean (SD) FIL200 and FIL100 exposure was 157.0 (51.49) and 156.0 (52.45) weeks. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (95% CI) for FIL200/FIL100 were 2.7 (1.4, 5.2)/2.4 (1.2, 5.1) for herpes zoster, 0.9 (0.3, 2.8)/1.0 (0.3, 3.2) for malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), and 0.6 (0.2, 2.4)/0.3 (0.0, 2.4) for major adverse cardiovascular events. More patients receiving FIL200 with prior FIL200 exposure achieved clinical remission vs other groups (including Clinical Disease Activity Index remission in 40% vs 27% or less at week 156).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIL200 and FIL100 were generally well tolerated by Japanese patients, without new, unexpected adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of filgotinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Week 156 interim results in FINCH 4.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiya Tanaka, Tsukasa Matsubara, Tatsuya Atsumi, Koichi Amano, Naoki Ishiguro, Shintaro Hirata, Kunihiro Yamaoka, Bernard G Combe, Peter Nash, Mark Genovese, Alena Pechonkina, Jie Liu, Akira Kondo, Haruhiko Fukada, Francesco De Leonardis, Tsutomu Takeuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roae099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe safety and efficacy of filgotinib 200 or 100 mg (FIL200/FIL100) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a long-term extension (LTE; NCT03025308).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who completed any of three parent studies (NCT02889796: inadequate response [IR] to methotrexate [MTX]; NCT02873936: IR to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; NCT02886728: MTX-naïve) without rescue therapy could enter the LTE; patients taking FIL continued their dosage, and those who received comparators were rerandomised to FIL200 or FIL100. This analysis includes week 156 interim results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among Japanese patients, 110 received FIL200, and 97 received FIL100. Mean (SD) FIL200 and FIL100 exposure was 157.0 (51.49) and 156.0 (52.45) weeks. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (95% CI) for FIL200/FIL100 were 2.7 (1.4, 5.2)/2.4 (1.2, 5.1) for herpes zoster, 0.9 (0.3, 2.8)/1.0 (0.3, 3.2) for malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), and 0.6 (0.2, 2.4)/0.3 (0.0, 2.4) for major adverse cardiovascular events. More patients receiving FIL200 with prior FIL200 exposure achieved clinical remission vs other groups (including Clinical Disease Activity Index remission in 40% vs 27% or less at week 156).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIL200 and FIL100 were generally well tolerated by Japanese patients, without new, unexpected adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and efficacy of filgotinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Week 156 interim results in FINCH 4.
Objectives: To describe safety and efficacy of filgotinib 200 or 100 mg (FIL200/FIL100) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a long-term extension (LTE; NCT03025308).
Methods: Patients who completed any of three parent studies (NCT02889796: inadequate response [IR] to methotrexate [MTX]; NCT02873936: IR to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; NCT02886728: MTX-naïve) without rescue therapy could enter the LTE; patients taking FIL continued their dosage, and those who received comparators were rerandomised to FIL200 or FIL100. This analysis includes week 156 interim results.
Results: Among Japanese patients, 110 received FIL200, and 97 received FIL100. Mean (SD) FIL200 and FIL100 exposure was 157.0 (51.49) and 156.0 (52.45) weeks. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (95% CI) for FIL200/FIL100 were 2.7 (1.4, 5.2)/2.4 (1.2, 5.1) for herpes zoster, 0.9 (0.3, 2.8)/1.0 (0.3, 3.2) for malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), and 0.6 (0.2, 2.4)/0.3 (0.0, 2.4) for major adverse cardiovascular events. More patients receiving FIL200 with prior FIL200 exposure achieved clinical remission vs other groups (including Clinical Disease Activity Index remission in 40% vs 27% or less at week 156).
Conclusions: FIL200 and FIL100 were generally well tolerated by Japanese patients, without new, unexpected adverse events.
期刊介绍：
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
