通过外展访问开展 SBIRT 对综合医院住院病人随后使用酒精治疗的长期效果:36 个月的随访。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jeppe Sig Juelsgaard Tryggedsson, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Bent Nielsen
{"title":"通过外展访问开展 SBIRT 对综合医院住院病人随后使用酒精治疗的长期效果:36 个月的随访。","authors":"Jeppe Sig Juelsgaard Tryggedsson, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Bent Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2424952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the long-term effect of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on alcohol treatment utilization among general hospital inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 36-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial included general hospital inpatients who were screened using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Patients with an AUDIT score of 8+ were included. Patients were randomized to either SBIRT (Relay) or treatment as-usual (TAU). Outcome was attendance at a specialized outpatient treatment institution or prescription of pharmacological alcohol treatment in general practice. Using the Danish Civil Registration System, patients were followed in the Danish National Patient Registry, Danish National Alcohol Treatment Register, and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Data was collected up to 36 months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 258 patients in the Relay group and 303 patients in the TAU group. In the Relay group, 36 (14.0%) patients received treatment versus 23 (7.6%) in the TAU group. Patients in the Relay group had higher odds for receiving treatment compared to the TAU group (<i>OR</i>: 1.97, <i>95% CI</i>: 1.1-3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Significantly more patients in the Relay group scored 16+ on the AUDIT and had already tried to change their alcohol consumption (both <i>p</i> < 0.01). Adjusted for potential confounders, the effect of the Relay intervention was reduced (<i>OR</i>: 1.37, <i>95%CI</i>: 0.7-2.5, <i>p</i> = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not find evidence that SBIRT is better than TAU at sustaining significant long-term alcohol treatment utilization after discharge among inpatients from general hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effectiveness of SBIRT by outreach visits on subsequent alcohol treatment utilization among inpatients from general hospital: a 36-months follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Jeppe Sig Juelsgaard Tryggedsson, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Bent Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039488.2024.2424952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the long-term effect of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on alcohol treatment utilization among general hospital inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 36-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial included general hospital inpatients who were screened using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Patients with an AUDIT score of 8+ were included. Patients were randomized to either SBIRT (Relay) or treatment as-usual (TAU). Outcome was attendance at a specialized outpatient treatment institution or prescription of pharmacological alcohol treatment in general practice. Using the Danish Civil Registration System, patients were followed in the Danish National Patient Registry, Danish National Alcohol Treatment Register, and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Data was collected up to 36 months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 258 patients in the Relay group and 303 patients in the TAU group. In the Relay group, 36 (14.0%) patients received treatment versus 23 (7.6%) in the TAU group. Patients in the Relay group had higher odds for receiving treatment compared to the TAU group (<i>OR</i>: 1.97, <i>95% CI</i>: 1.1-3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Significantly more patients in the Relay group scored 16+ on the AUDIT and had already tried to change their alcohol consumption (both <i>p</i> < 0.01). Adjusted for potential confounders, the effect of the Relay intervention was reduced (<i>OR</i>: 1.37, <i>95%CI</i>: 0.7-2.5, <i>p</i> = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not find evidence that SBIRT is better than TAU at sustaining significant long-term alcohol treatment utilization after discharge among inpatients from general hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2424952\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2424952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)对综合医院住院患者酒精治疗利用率的长期影响:这项为期 36 个月的随机对照试验的随访对象包括使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)进行筛查的综合医院住院患者。AUDIT 得分超过 8 分的患者被纳入其中。患者被随机分配接受 SBIRT(接力治疗)或常规治疗(TAU)。结果是到专门的门诊治疗机构就诊,还是在全科医生的指导下接受药物酒精治疗。利用丹麦民事登记系统,在丹麦国家患者登记处、丹麦国家酒精治疗登记处和丹麦国家处方登记处对患者进行跟踪调查。数据收集时间长达出院后 36 个月:研究对象包括接力治疗组的 258 名患者和 TAU 组的 303 名患者。中继组中有36名(14.0%)患者接受了治疗,而TAU组中有23名(7.6%)患者接受了治疗。与 TAU 组相比,Relay 组患者接受治疗的几率更高(OR:1.97,95% CI:1.1-3.4,P = 0.01)。接力组中有更多的患者在 AUDIT 中得分超过 16 分,并已尝试改变饮酒习惯(P OR:1.37,95%CI:0.7-2.5,P = 0.31):本研究没有发现证据表明,SBIRT 比 TAU 更能在综合医院住院病人出院后维持显著的长期酒精治疗利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term effectiveness of SBIRT by outreach visits on subsequent alcohol treatment utilization among inpatients from general hospital: a 36-months follow-up.

Aim: To investigate the long-term effect of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on alcohol treatment utilization among general hospital inpatients.

Methods: This 36-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial included general hospital inpatients who were screened using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Patients with an AUDIT score of 8+ were included. Patients were randomized to either SBIRT (Relay) or treatment as-usual (TAU). Outcome was attendance at a specialized outpatient treatment institution or prescription of pharmacological alcohol treatment in general practice. Using the Danish Civil Registration System, patients were followed in the Danish National Patient Registry, Danish National Alcohol Treatment Register, and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Data was collected up to 36 months after discharge.

Results: The study population consisted of 258 patients in the Relay group and 303 patients in the TAU group. In the Relay group, 36 (14.0%) patients received treatment versus 23 (7.6%) in the TAU group. Patients in the Relay group had higher odds for receiving treatment compared to the TAU group (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.1-3.4, p = 0.01). Significantly more patients in the Relay group scored 16+ on the AUDIT and had already tried to change their alcohol consumption (both p < 0.01). Adjusted for potential confounders, the effect of the Relay intervention was reduced (OR: 1.37, 95%CI: 0.7-2.5, p = 0.31).

Conclusions: This study did not find evidence that SBIRT is better than TAU at sustaining significant long-term alcohol treatment utilization after discharge among inpatients from general hospital.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信