两名烧伤幸存者体表总面积超过 90% 后四年的生活质量评估:病例报告。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Stephanie Chang, Aldin Malkoc, Jaclyn R Cerceo, Amanda Daoud, David T Wong
{"title":"两名烧伤幸存者体表总面积超过 90% 后四年的生活质量评估:病例报告。","authors":"Stephanie Chang, Aldin Malkoc, Jaclyn R Cerceo, Amanda Daoud, David T Wong","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few reports in the literature detailing the Quality of Life (QOL) of survivors with greater than 90% total body surface area (TBSA) burns. The objective was to assess two such individuals seen at our center with the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) survey four years after discharge. Subject responses were categorized into their respective BSHS-B health domains (heat sensitivity, affect, hand function, treatment regimens, work, sexuality, interpersonal relationships, simple abilities, and body image) and a raw score was calculated for each domain. Lower scores indicated a greater perceived decrease in QOL. The nine domains of BSHS-B survey questions were further separated into three categories: physical (hand function, work, simple abilities), treatment (treatment regimens and heat sensitivity), and psychosocial (interpersonal relationships, affect, body image, sexuality). The psychosocial category had higher scores and better outcomes, while the physical and treatment ones had lower scores and worse outcomes compared to the other categories. For both individuals, interpersonal relationships and simple tasks domains were considered important in their QOL, while work, heat sensitivity and hand function received lower scores. Family support, intense physical rehabilitation, and psychosocial management were crucial during the postoperative and follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life Assessment Four Years after a More than Ninety Percent Total Body Surface Area in Two Survivors with Burns: Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Chang, Aldin Malkoc, Jaclyn R Cerceo, Amanda Daoud, David T Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are few reports in the literature detailing the Quality of Life (QOL) of survivors with greater than 90% total body surface area (TBSA) burns. The objective was to assess two such individuals seen at our center with the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) survey four years after discharge. Subject responses were categorized into their respective BSHS-B health domains (heat sensitivity, affect, hand function, treatment regimens, work, sexuality, interpersonal relationships, simple abilities, and body image) and a raw score was calculated for each domain. Lower scores indicated a greater perceived decrease in QOL. The nine domains of BSHS-B survey questions were further separated into three categories: physical (hand function, work, simple abilities), treatment (treatment regimens and heat sensitivity), and psychosocial (interpersonal relationships, affect, body image, sexuality). The psychosocial category had higher scores and better outcomes, while the physical and treatment ones had lower scores and worse outcomes compared to the other categories. For both individuals, interpersonal relationships and simple tasks domains were considered important in their QOL, while work, heat sensitivity and hand function received lower scores. Family support, intense physical rehabilitation, and psychosocial management were crucial during the postoperative and follow-up periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关烧伤总面积超过 90% 的幸存者生活质量 (QOL) 的详细文献报道很少。我们的目的是对本中心接诊的两名此类患者在出院四年后进行烧伤专用健康量表-简易版(BSHS-B)调查评估。受试者的回答被归入各自的 BSHS-B 健康领域(热敏感性、情感、手部功能、治疗方案、工作、性、人际关系、简单能力和身体形象),并计算出每个领域的原始得分。分数越低,表明感知到的 QOL 下降幅度越大。BSHS-B 调查问题的九个领域进一步分为三类:身体(手部功能、工作、简单能力)、治疗(治疗方案和热敏感性)和社会心理(人际关系、情感、身体形象、性)。与其他类别相比,心理社会类别得分更高,结果更好,而身体和治疗类别得分更低,结果更差。对于这两个人来说,人际关系和简单工作领域被认为是他们 QOL 的重要方面,而工作、热敏感性和手部功能的得分较低。在术后和随访期间,家庭支持、强化身体康复和社会心理管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Life Assessment Four Years after a More than Ninety Percent Total Body Surface Area in Two Survivors with Burns: Case Report.

There are few reports in the literature detailing the Quality of Life (QOL) of survivors with greater than 90% total body surface area (TBSA) burns. The objective was to assess two such individuals seen at our center with the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) survey four years after discharge. Subject responses were categorized into their respective BSHS-B health domains (heat sensitivity, affect, hand function, treatment regimens, work, sexuality, interpersonal relationships, simple abilities, and body image) and a raw score was calculated for each domain. Lower scores indicated a greater perceived decrease in QOL. The nine domains of BSHS-B survey questions were further separated into three categories: physical (hand function, work, simple abilities), treatment (treatment regimens and heat sensitivity), and psychosocial (interpersonal relationships, affect, body image, sexuality). The psychosocial category had higher scores and better outcomes, while the physical and treatment ones had lower scores and worse outcomes compared to the other categories. For both individuals, interpersonal relationships and simple tasks domains were considered important in their QOL, while work, heat sensitivity and hand function received lower scores. Family support, intense physical rehabilitation, and psychosocial management were crucial during the postoperative and follow-up periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信