循环肿瘤 DNA 图谱在检测非小细胞肺癌靶向融合方面的临床实用性。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341
Young-Gon Kim, Boram Lee, Changhee Ha, Cheonghwa Lee, Hyun Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn, Yoon-La Choi, Sehhoon Park, Jong-Won Kim
{"title":"循环肿瘤 DNA 图谱在检测非小细胞肺癌靶向融合方面的临床实用性。","authors":"Young-Gon Kim, Boram Lee, Changhee Ha, Cheonghwa Lee, Hyun Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn, Yoon-La Choi, Sehhoon Park, Jong-Won Kim","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous studies have suggested high concordance between tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests but only few of them focused on fusions. In addition, atypical breakpoints occasionally detected from DNA-based fusion detection make interpretation difficult, and their clinical significance remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical utility of ctDNA CGP for fusion detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of ctDNA CGP tests performed on patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer during routine clinical care were retrospectively reviewed. The concordance between ctDNA CGP and combined tissue test results was analyzed using CGP, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The clinical significance of fusions detected by ctDNA CGP, including those with atypical breakpoints at the DNA level, was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 264 patients were tested with ctDNA CGP. Fusions were detected in 27 patients (10.2%), and the fusion drivers were <i>RET</i> (n=12, 4.6%), <i>ALK</i> (n=9, 3.4%), <i>ROS1</i> (n=4, 1.5%), and <i>FGFR2</i> (n=2, 0.8%). The overall prevalence of fusion in tissue CGP was comparable to that in ctDNA CGP. A total of 371 ctDNA-tissue test pairs were available, and the overall positive and negative percent agreement rates were 92.9% (13/14) and 100.0% (357/357), respectively. One <i>ALK</i> IHC-positive and ctDNA CGP-negative case did not respond to <i>ALK</i>-targeted therapy. Response to targeted therapy was assessed in 16 patients, and a partial response was achieved in all patients, including four with atypical breakpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fusion detection using ctDNA CGP showed high concordance with tissue tests and accuracy in predicting therapeutic responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. ctDNA CGP may provide an important diagnostic tool for fusion detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA profiling in detecting targetable fusions in non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Gon Kim, Boram Lee, Changhee Ha, Cheonghwa Lee, Hyun Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn, Yoon-La Choi, Sehhoon Park, Jong-Won Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous studies have suggested high concordance between tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests but only few of them focused on fusions. In addition, atypical breakpoints occasionally detected from DNA-based fusion detection make interpretation difficult, and their clinical significance remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical utility of ctDNA CGP for fusion detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of ctDNA CGP tests performed on patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer during routine clinical care were retrospectively reviewed. The concordance between ctDNA CGP and combined tissue test results was analyzed using CGP, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The clinical significance of fusions detected by ctDNA CGP, including those with atypical breakpoints at the DNA level, was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 264 patients were tested with ctDNA CGP. Fusions were detected in 27 patients (10.2%), and the fusion drivers were <i>RET</i> (n=12, 4.6%), <i>ALK</i> (n=9, 3.4%), <i>ROS1</i> (n=4, 1.5%), and <i>FGFR2</i> (n=2, 0.8%). The overall prevalence of fusion in tissue CGP was comparable to that in ctDNA CGP. A total of 371 ctDNA-tissue test pairs were available, and the overall positive and negative percent agreement rates were 92.9% (13/14) and 100.0% (357/357), respectively. One <i>ALK</i> IHC-positive and ctDNA CGP-negative case did not respond to <i>ALK</i>-targeted therapy. Response to targeted therapy was assessed in 16 patients, and a partial response was achieved in all patients, including four with atypical breakpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fusion detection using ctDNA CGP showed high concordance with tissue tests and accuracy in predicting therapeutic responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. ctDNA CGP may provide an important diagnostic tool for fusion detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1463341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:大量研究表明,组织和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)综合基因组图谱(CGP)检测之间的一致性很高,但其中只有少数研究关注融合。此外,基于 DNA 的融合检测偶尔会检测到非典型断点,这给解读带来了困难,而且其临床意义仍不明确。本研究评估了ctDNA CGP在融合检测中的临床实用性:方法:回顾性分析了常规临床治疗期间对 IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者进行的 ctDNA CGP 检测结果。使用 CGP、免疫组化、荧光原位杂交和逆转录聚合酶链反应分析了ctDNA CGP 和联合组织检测结果之间的一致性。评估了ctDNA CGP检测到的融合的临床意义,包括那些在DNA水平上有非典型断点的融合:共有 264 名患者接受了ctDNA CGP 检测。结果:共有264名患者接受了ctDNA CGP检测,其中27名患者(10.2%)检测到融合,融合驱动因子为RET(12人,4.6%)、ALK(9人,3.4%)、ROS1(4人,1.5%)和FGFR2(2人,0.8%)。组织CGP的总体融合率与ctDNA CGP相当。共有371对ctDNA-组织检测对,总的阳性和阴性一致率分别为92.9%(13/14)和100.0%(357/357)。1例ALK IHC阳性、ctDNA CGP阴性的病例对ALK靶向治疗无反应。对16名患者的靶向治疗反应进行了评估,所有患者都获得了部分反应,其中包括4名断点不典型的患者:结论:使用ctDNA CGP进行融合检测与组织检测具有很高的一致性,在预测非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗反应方面也很准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA profiling in detecting targetable fusions in non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: Numerous studies have suggested high concordance between tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests but only few of them focused on fusions. In addition, atypical breakpoints occasionally detected from DNA-based fusion detection make interpretation difficult, and their clinical significance remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical utility of ctDNA CGP for fusion detection.

Methods: The results of ctDNA CGP tests performed on patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer during routine clinical care were retrospectively reviewed. The concordance between ctDNA CGP and combined tissue test results was analyzed using CGP, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The clinical significance of fusions detected by ctDNA CGP, including those with atypical breakpoints at the DNA level, was assessed.

Results: In total, 264 patients were tested with ctDNA CGP. Fusions were detected in 27 patients (10.2%), and the fusion drivers were RET (n=12, 4.6%), ALK (n=9, 3.4%), ROS1 (n=4, 1.5%), and FGFR2 (n=2, 0.8%). The overall prevalence of fusion in tissue CGP was comparable to that in ctDNA CGP. A total of 371 ctDNA-tissue test pairs were available, and the overall positive and negative percent agreement rates were 92.9% (13/14) and 100.0% (357/357), respectively. One ALK IHC-positive and ctDNA CGP-negative case did not respond to ALK-targeted therapy. Response to targeted therapy was assessed in 16 patients, and a partial response was achieved in all patients, including four with atypical breakpoints.

Conclusion: Fusion detection using ctDNA CGP showed high concordance with tissue tests and accuracy in predicting therapeutic responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. ctDNA CGP may provide an important diagnostic tool for fusion detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信