脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包的可行性随机对照试验:预防患有焦虑症的年轻成年人持续出现脑震荡症状的实时视频计划。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jonathan Greenberg, Nadine S Levey, Molly Becker, Gloria Y Yeh, Joseph T Giacino, Grant Iverson, Noah D Silverberg, Robert A Parker, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包的可行性随机对照试验:预防患有焦虑症的年轻成年人持续出现脑震荡症状的实时视频计划。","authors":"Jonathan Greenberg, Nadine S Levey, Molly Becker, Gloria Y Yeh, Joseph T Giacino, Grant Iverson, Noah D Silverberg, Robert A Parker, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion (TOR-C), the first mind-body program aiming to prevent persistent concussion symptoms among young adults with anxiety, and an active control (Health Enhancement after Concussion; HE-C). We also tested preliminary improvements in outcome measures and putative mechanistic targets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blind, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic medical center in the US Northeast.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty young adults (ages 18-35) with a recent concussion (3-10 weeks prior) and anxiety (≥5 on the GAD7 questionnaire).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Both interventions consisted of four 45-minute 1:1 sessions with a clinician over Zoom. TOR-C (n=25) taught mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and return-to-activity skills. HE-C (n=25) taught health education (e.g., sleep, nutrition) without skills.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary: feasibility outcomes (e.g., recruitment, credibility, expectancy, acceptability, safety, feasibility of assessments, fidelity, satisfaction, TOR-C homework adherence) with a-priori-set benchmarks. Secondary: intervention outcomes were concussion symptoms (PCSS), physical function (WHODAS), anxiety (GAD7/HAD-A), depression (HADS-D) and pain (NRS). TOR-C mechanistic targets were pain catastrophizing (PCS), mindfulness (CAMS-R), fear avoidance (FAB-TBI), limiting behavior and all-or-nothing behavior (BRIQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions met all feasibility benchmarks and were associated with significant improvements in outcomes (concussion symptoms, physical function, anxiety, depression and pain; d=0.44-1.21) and TOR-C mechanistic targets (pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, fear-avoidance, and limiting behavior; Cohen's d=0.41-1.24). Improvements in all-or-nothing behavior were only significant in TOR-C (d=0.52). Improvements in all mechanistic targets except all-or-nothing behavior following TOR-C were significantly associated with improvements in at least one outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings provide strong support for the feasibility of TOR-C and HE-C, and preliminary evidence for improvements in mechanistic targets and outcomes. Findings inform a future fully-powered RCT testing efficacy of TOR-C vs. HE-C.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion: A Live Video Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms in Young Adults with Anxiety.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Greenberg, Nadine S Levey, Molly Becker, Gloria Y Yeh, Joseph T Giacino, Grant Iverson, Noah D Silverberg, Robert A Parker, Ana-Maria Vranceanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion (TOR-C), the first mind-body program aiming to prevent persistent concussion symptoms among young adults with anxiety, and an active control (Health Enhancement after Concussion; HE-C). We also tested preliminary improvements in outcome measures and putative mechanistic targets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blind, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic medical center in the US Northeast.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty young adults (ages 18-35) with a recent concussion (3-10 weeks prior) and anxiety (≥5 on the GAD7 questionnaire).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Both interventions consisted of four 45-minute 1:1 sessions with a clinician over Zoom. TOR-C (n=25) taught mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and return-to-activity skills. HE-C (n=25) taught health education (e.g., sleep, nutrition) without skills.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary: feasibility outcomes (e.g., recruitment, credibility, expectancy, acceptability, safety, feasibility of assessments, fidelity, satisfaction, TOR-C homework adherence) with a-priori-set benchmarks. Secondary: intervention outcomes were concussion symptoms (PCSS), physical function (WHODAS), anxiety (GAD7/HAD-A), depression (HADS-D) and pain (NRS). TOR-C mechanistic targets were pain catastrophizing (PCS), mindfulness (CAMS-R), fear avoidance (FAB-TBI), limiting behavior and all-or-nothing behavior (BRIQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions met all feasibility benchmarks and were associated with significant improvements in outcomes (concussion symptoms, physical function, anxiety, depression and pain; d=0.44-1.21) and TOR-C mechanistic targets (pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, fear-avoidance, and limiting behavior; Cohen's d=0.41-1.24). Improvements in all-or-nothing behavior were only significant in TOR-C (d=0.52). Improvements in all mechanistic targets except all-or-nothing behavior following TOR-C were significantly associated with improvements in at least one outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings provide strong support for the feasibility of TOR-C and HE-C, and preliminary evidence for improvements in mechanistic targets and outcomes. Findings inform a future fully-powered RCT testing efficacy of TOR-C vs. HE-C.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包(TOR-C)的可行性:评估 "脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包"(TOR-C)和积极对照组(脑震荡后健康增强;HE-C)的可行性。"TOR-C "是首个旨在预防患有焦虑症的年轻成年人出现持续性脑震荡症状的身心项目。我们还测试了在结果测量和推测机制目标方面的初步改进:设计:单盲、双臂、随机对照试验:地点:美国东北部的学术医疗中心:50名近期有脑震荡(3-10周前)和焦虑(GAD7问卷≥5分)的年轻人(18-35岁):两种干预都包括四次 45 分钟的 1:1 课程,由一名临床医生通过 Zoom 进行指导。TOR-C(人数=25)教授身心、认知行为和恢复活动技能。HE-C(人数=25)教授健康教育(如睡眠、营养),不提供技能:主要结果:可行性结果(如招募、可信度、期望值、可接受性、安全性、评估的可行性、忠实性、满意度、TOR-C 家庭作业的坚持性)与事先设定的基准。次要:干预结果包括脑震荡症状(PCSS)、身体功能(WHODAS)、焦虑(GAD7/HAD-A)、抑郁(HADS-D)和疼痛(NRS)。TOR-C 机制目标是疼痛灾难化(PCS)、正念(CAMS-R)、恐惧回避(FAB-TBI)、限制行为和全有或全无行为(BRIQ):结果:两种干预措施均符合所有可行性基准,并显著改善了结果(脑震荡症状、身体功能、焦虑、抑郁和疼痛;d=0.44-1.21)和 TOR-C 机制目标(疼痛灾难化、正念、恐惧回避和限制行为;Cohen's d=0.41-1.24)。全有或全无行为的改善仅在 TOR-C 中具有显著性(d=0.52)。TOR-C治疗后,除全或无行为外,所有机理目标的改善都与至少一种结果的改善有显著关联:研究结果为 TOR-C 和 HE-C 的可行性提供了有力支持,也为机理目标和结果的改善提供了初步证据。研究结果为未来测试TOR-C与HE-C疗效的全效RCT提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion: A Live Video Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms in Young Adults with Anxiety.

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Concussion (TOR-C), the first mind-body program aiming to prevent persistent concussion symptoms among young adults with anxiety, and an active control (Health Enhancement after Concussion; HE-C). We also tested preliminary improvements in outcome measures and putative mechanistic targets.

Design: Single-blind, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Academic medical center in the US Northeast.

Participants: Fifty young adults (ages 18-35) with a recent concussion (3-10 weeks prior) and anxiety (≥5 on the GAD7 questionnaire).

Interventions: Both interventions consisted of four 45-minute 1:1 sessions with a clinician over Zoom. TOR-C (n=25) taught mind-body, cognitive-behavioral, and return-to-activity skills. HE-C (n=25) taught health education (e.g., sleep, nutrition) without skills.

Main outcome measures: Primary: feasibility outcomes (e.g., recruitment, credibility, expectancy, acceptability, safety, feasibility of assessments, fidelity, satisfaction, TOR-C homework adherence) with a-priori-set benchmarks. Secondary: intervention outcomes were concussion symptoms (PCSS), physical function (WHODAS), anxiety (GAD7/HAD-A), depression (HADS-D) and pain (NRS). TOR-C mechanistic targets were pain catastrophizing (PCS), mindfulness (CAMS-R), fear avoidance (FAB-TBI), limiting behavior and all-or-nothing behavior (BRIQ).

Results: Both interventions met all feasibility benchmarks and were associated with significant improvements in outcomes (concussion symptoms, physical function, anxiety, depression and pain; d=0.44-1.21) and TOR-C mechanistic targets (pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, fear-avoidance, and limiting behavior; Cohen's d=0.41-1.24). Improvements in all-or-nothing behavior were only significant in TOR-C (d=0.52). Improvements in all mechanistic targets except all-or-nothing behavior following TOR-C were significantly associated with improvements in at least one outcome.

Conclusion: Findings provide strong support for the feasibility of TOR-C and HE-C, and preliminary evidence for improvements in mechanistic targets and outcomes. Findings inform a future fully-powered RCT testing efficacy of TOR-C vs. HE-C.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信