化学反应中的例外、悖论及其解决方案。

IF 3.3 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.4c02246
Guanqi Qiu
{"title":"化学反应中的例外、悖论及其解决方案。","authors":"Guanqi Qiu","doi":"10.1021/acs.joc.4c02246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progress in chemistry has primarily been framed through inductive processes, leading to the frequent emergence of exceptions and unexpected reactivities. These anomalies─ranging from surprising reactivity trends and paradoxical understandings to unanticipated parameter influences and unexpected successes or failures in synthetic methods─offer valuable insights that can drive scientific discovery. While it is commonly accepted that such exceptions can drive progress, many have been passively accepted without being explored for opportunities. Although numerous chemists have addressed exceptions and refined chemical models and theories, employing a systematic framework for actively exploring and understanding the underlying causes of exceptions could resolve paradoxes in broader contexts and create a greater impact than treating anomalies as isolated occurrences. This perspective demonstrates a proactive epistemic approach to uncovering the opportunities presented by exceptions and promotes deliberate, thoughtful engagement with paradoxes and anomalies. While the examples primarily focus on physical organic chemistry, the concepts are broadly applicable across various fields in chemical science. The thinking framework presented here is neither exhaustive nor prescriptive, but it outlines one of many potentially possible ways to inspire further development in how these anomalies could be harnessed for advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":57,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Organic Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"16307-16316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exceptions, Paradoxes, and Their Resolutions in Chemical Reactivity.\",\"authors\":\"Guanqi Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.joc.4c02246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Progress in chemistry has primarily been framed through inductive processes, leading to the frequent emergence of exceptions and unexpected reactivities. These anomalies─ranging from surprising reactivity trends and paradoxical understandings to unanticipated parameter influences and unexpected successes or failures in synthetic methods─offer valuable insights that can drive scientific discovery. While it is commonly accepted that such exceptions can drive progress, many have been passively accepted without being explored for opportunities. Although numerous chemists have addressed exceptions and refined chemical models and theories, employing a systematic framework for actively exploring and understanding the underlying causes of exceptions could resolve paradoxes in broader contexts and create a greater impact than treating anomalies as isolated occurrences. This perspective demonstrates a proactive epistemic approach to uncovering the opportunities presented by exceptions and promotes deliberate, thoughtful engagement with paradoxes and anomalies. While the examples primarily focus on physical organic chemistry, the concepts are broadly applicable across various fields in chemical science. The thinking framework presented here is neither exhaustive nor prescriptive, but it outlines one of many potentially possible ways to inspire further development in how these anomalies could be harnessed for advancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":57,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Organic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16307-16316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Organic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02246\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Organic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化学的进步主要是通过归纳过程来实现的,因此经常会出现一些例外情况和意想不到的反应。这些反常现象--从令人惊讶的反应趋势和自相矛盾的理解,到意料之外的参数影响和合成方法中意想不到的成功或失败--提供了可推动科学发现的宝贵见解。虽然人们普遍认为这些例外情况可以推动科学进步,但许多例外情况都被动地接受了,没有被发掘出机会。尽管许多化学家已经解决了异常现象问题,并完善了化学模型和理论,但采用系统的框架来积极探索和理解异常现象的根本原因,可以在更广泛的背景下解决悖论问题,并产生比将异常现象视为孤立事件更大的影响。这种观点展示了一种积极主动的认识论方法,以发掘异常现象带来的机遇,并促进对悖论和异常现象进行深思熟虑的处理。虽然例子主要集中在物理有机化学领域,但这些概念广泛适用于化学科学的各个领域。这里介绍的思维框架既不是详尽无遗的,也不是规定性的,但它概述了许多可能的方法,启发人们进一步发展如何利用这些反常现象来取得进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exceptions, Paradoxes, and Their Resolutions in Chemical Reactivity.

Exceptions, Paradoxes, and Their Resolutions in Chemical Reactivity.

Progress in chemistry has primarily been framed through inductive processes, leading to the frequent emergence of exceptions and unexpected reactivities. These anomalies─ranging from surprising reactivity trends and paradoxical understandings to unanticipated parameter influences and unexpected successes or failures in synthetic methods─offer valuable insights that can drive scientific discovery. While it is commonly accepted that such exceptions can drive progress, many have been passively accepted without being explored for opportunities. Although numerous chemists have addressed exceptions and refined chemical models and theories, employing a systematic framework for actively exploring and understanding the underlying causes of exceptions could resolve paradoxes in broader contexts and create a greater impact than treating anomalies as isolated occurrences. This perspective demonstrates a proactive epistemic approach to uncovering the opportunities presented by exceptions and promotes deliberate, thoughtful engagement with paradoxes and anomalies. While the examples primarily focus on physical organic chemistry, the concepts are broadly applicable across various fields in chemical science. The thinking framework presented here is neither exhaustive nor prescriptive, but it outlines one of many potentially possible ways to inspire further development in how these anomalies could be harnessed for advancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 化学-有机化学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organic Chemistry welcomes original contributions of fundamental research in all branches of the theory and practice of organic chemistry. In selecting manuscripts for publication, the editors place emphasis on the quality and novelty of the work, as well as the breadth of interest to the organic chemistry community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信