利用心电图图像进行心肌梗塞分类的信号引导多任务学习。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1159/000542399
Bo Eun Park, Byungeun Shon, Jungrae Cho, Min-Su Jung, Jong Sung Park, Myeong Seop Kim, Eunkyu Lee, Hyohun Choi, Hyuk Kyoon Park, Yoon Jung Park, Hong Nyun Kim, Namkyun Kim, Myung Hwan Bae, Jang Hoon Lee, Dong Heon Yang, Hun Sik Park, Yongkeun Cho, Sungmoon Jeong, Se Yong Jang
{"title":"利用心电图图像进行心肌梗塞分类的信号引导多任务学习。","authors":"Bo Eun Park, Byungeun Shon, Jungrae Cho, Min-Su Jung, Jong Sung Park, Myeong Seop Kim, Eunkyu Lee, Hyohun Choi, Hyuk Kyoon Park, Yoon Jung Park, Hong Nyun Kim, Namkyun Kim, Myung Hwan Bae, Jang Hoon Lee, Dong Heon Yang, Hun Sik Park, Yongkeun Cho, Sungmoon Jeong, Se Yong Jang","doi":"10.1159/000542399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) needs to be swift and accurate, but definitively diagnosing it based on the first test encountered in clinical practice, the electrocardiogram (ECG), is not an easy task. The purpose of the study is to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm using multitask learning method to differentiate patients experiencing MI from those without coronary artery disease using image-based ECG data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DL model was developed based on 11,227 ECG images. We developed a new ECG interpretation algorithm through signal-guided multitask learning, building on a previously published single-task algorithm. The utility of this model was evaluated by testing 51 physicians in interpreting ECGs with and without the assistance of the DL model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 90.56% accuracy, 83.82% sensitivity, 93.02% specificity, 81.44% precision, and an F1 score of 82.61% in discriminating MI ECG. Overall, the median accuracy of ECG interpretation improved from 62% to 68% with the DL algorithm. Trainees and specialists in internal medicine experienced significant accuracy increases (60% to 66% for trainees, 72% to 80% for specialists). In the MI group, NSTEMI accuracy was notably lower than STEMI (33% vs. 80%, p < 0.001), but the DL algorithm improved interpretative capabilities in both NSTEMI and STEMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Signal-guided multitask DL algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared with previous single-task algorithm. The DL algorithm supports the physicians' decision discriminating MI ECGs from non-MI ECGs. The improvement was consistent in subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signal-guided multitask learning for myocardial infarction classification using images of electrocardiogram.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Eun Park, Byungeun Shon, Jungrae Cho, Min-Su Jung, Jong Sung Park, Myeong Seop Kim, Eunkyu Lee, Hyohun Choi, Hyuk Kyoon Park, Yoon Jung Park, Hong Nyun Kim, Namkyun Kim, Myung Hwan Bae, Jang Hoon Lee, Dong Heon Yang, Hun Sik Park, Yongkeun Cho, Sungmoon Jeong, Se Yong Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) needs to be swift and accurate, but definitively diagnosing it based on the first test encountered in clinical practice, the electrocardiogram (ECG), is not an easy task. The purpose of the study is to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm using multitask learning method to differentiate patients experiencing MI from those without coronary artery disease using image-based ECG data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DL model was developed based on 11,227 ECG images. We developed a new ECG interpretation algorithm through signal-guided multitask learning, building on a previously published single-task algorithm. The utility of this model was evaluated by testing 51 physicians in interpreting ECGs with and without the assistance of the DL model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 90.56% accuracy, 83.82% sensitivity, 93.02% specificity, 81.44% precision, and an F1 score of 82.61% in discriminating MI ECG. Overall, the median accuracy of ECG interpretation improved from 62% to 68% with the DL algorithm. Trainees and specialists in internal medicine experienced significant accuracy increases (60% to 66% for trainees, 72% to 80% for specialists). In the MI group, NSTEMI accuracy was notably lower than STEMI (33% vs. 80%, p < 0.001), but the DL algorithm improved interpretative capabilities in both NSTEMI and STEMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Signal-guided multitask DL algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared with previous single-task algorithm. The DL algorithm supports the physicians' decision discriminating MI ECGs from non-MI ECGs. The improvement was consistent in subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:心肌梗死(MI)的诊断需要迅速而准确,但根据临床实践中遇到的第一个测试--心电图(ECG)来明确诊断心肌梗死并非易事。本研究的目的是利用多任务学习方法开发一种深度学习(DL)算法,利用基于图像的心电图数据区分心肌梗死患者和无冠状动脉疾病患者:方法:基于 11,227 张心电图图像开发了一个 DL 模型。我们在之前发布的单任务算法基础上,通过信号引导的多任务学习开发了一种新的心电图解读算法。通过测试 51 名医生在有 DL 模型辅助和没有 DL 模型辅助的情况下解读心电图的情况,对该模型的实用性进行了评估:结果:所提出的模型表现出卓越的性能,在鉴别心肌梗死心电图方面达到了 90.56% 的准确率、83.82% 的灵敏度、93.02% 的特异性、81.44% 的精确度和 82.61% 的 F1 分数。总体而言,采用 DL 算法后,心电图判读的中位准确率从 62% 提高到 68%。内科受训人员和专家的准确率显著提高(受训人员从 60% 提高到 66%,专家从 72% 提高到 80%)。在心肌梗死组中,NSTEMI 的准确率明显低于 STEMI(33% 对 80%,P < 0.001),但 DL 算法提高了 NSTEMI 和 STEMI 的判读能力:结论:与之前的单任务算法相比,信号引导的多任务 DL 算法表现出更优越的性能。DL 算法有助于医生做出区分 MI ECG 和非 MI ECG 的决定。这种改进在 STEMI 和 NSTEMI 亚组中是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Signal-guided multitask learning for myocardial infarction classification using images of electrocardiogram.

Introduction: The diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) needs to be swift and accurate, but definitively diagnosing it based on the first test encountered in clinical practice, the electrocardiogram (ECG), is not an easy task. The purpose of the study is to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm using multitask learning method to differentiate patients experiencing MI from those without coronary artery disease using image-based ECG data.

Methods: A DL model was developed based on 11,227 ECG images. We developed a new ECG interpretation algorithm through signal-guided multitask learning, building on a previously published single-task algorithm. The utility of this model was evaluated by testing 51 physicians in interpreting ECGs with and without the assistance of the DL model.

Results: The proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 90.56% accuracy, 83.82% sensitivity, 93.02% specificity, 81.44% precision, and an F1 score of 82.61% in discriminating MI ECG. Overall, the median accuracy of ECG interpretation improved from 62% to 68% with the DL algorithm. Trainees and specialists in internal medicine experienced significant accuracy increases (60% to 66% for trainees, 72% to 80% for specialists). In the MI group, NSTEMI accuracy was notably lower than STEMI (33% vs. 80%, p < 0.001), but the DL algorithm improved interpretative capabilities in both NSTEMI and STEMI.

Conclusions: Signal-guided multitask DL algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared with previous single-task algorithm. The DL algorithm supports the physicians' decision discriminating MI ECGs from non-MI ECGs. The improvement was consistent in subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信