Andrea Parenti, Walter Zegada-Lizarazu, Karla Dussan, Ana M. López-Contreras, Truus de Vrije, Igor Staritsky, Berien Elbersen, Bert Annevelink, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Katja Oehmichen, Niels Dögnitz, Andrea Monti
{"title":"由 iLUC 风险低的新型种植系统提供的先进生物燃料价值链","authors":"Andrea Parenti, Walter Zegada-Lizarazu, Karla Dussan, Ana M. López-Contreras, Truus de Vrije, Igor Staritsky, Berien Elbersen, Bert Annevelink, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Katja Oehmichen, Niels Dögnitz, Andrea Monti","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing lignocellulosic feedstock for advanced biofuels can tackle the decarbonization of the transport sector. Dedicated biomass produced alongside food systems with low indirect land use change (iLUC) impact can broaden the feedstock availability, thus streamlining the supply chains. The objective of this study was the design and evaluation of advanced ethanol value chains for the Emilia-Romagna region based on low iLUC feedstock. Two dedicated lignocellulosic crops (biomass sorghum and sunn hemp) were evaluated in double cropping systems alongside food crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) as sources to simulate the value chains. A parcel-level regional analysis was carried out, then the LocaGIStics2.0 model was used for the spatial design and review of the biomass delivery chain options regarding cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the different feedstock mixes. Literature data on bioethanol production from similar feedstocks were used to estimate yields, process costs, and GHG emissions of a biorefinery process based on these biomasses. Within the chain options, GHG emissions were overly sensitive to cultivation input, mostly N-fertilization. This considered, GHG emissions resulted similar across different feedstock with straw/stover (averaging 13 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), sunn hemp (14 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), and biomass sorghum (16 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel). On the other hand, the bioethanol produced from biomass sorghum (608 € Mg<sup>−1</sup> of bioethanol) was cheaper compared with straw (632 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), sunn hemp (672 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), and stover (710 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>). The bioethanol cost ranged from 0.0017 to 0.020 € MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel depending on the feedstock, with operations and maintenance impacting up to 90% of the final cost. In summary, a single bioethanol plant with an annual capacity of 250,000 Mg of biomass could replace from 5% to 7% of the Emilia-Romagna's ethanol fuel consumption, depending on the applied sourcing scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Parenti, Walter Zegada-Lizarazu, Karla Dussan, Ana M. López-Contreras, Truus de Vrije, Igor Staritsky, Berien Elbersen, Bert Annevelink, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Katja Oehmichen, Niels Dögnitz, Andrea Monti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Increasing lignocellulosic feedstock for advanced biofuels can tackle the decarbonization of the transport sector. Dedicated biomass produced alongside food systems with low indirect land use change (iLUC) impact can broaden the feedstock availability, thus streamlining the supply chains. The objective of this study was the design and evaluation of advanced ethanol value chains for the Emilia-Romagna region based on low iLUC feedstock. Two dedicated lignocellulosic crops (biomass sorghum and sunn hemp) were evaluated in double cropping systems alongside food crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) as sources to simulate the value chains. A parcel-level regional analysis was carried out, then the LocaGIStics2.0 model was used for the spatial design and review of the biomass delivery chain options regarding cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the different feedstock mixes. Literature data on bioethanol production from similar feedstocks were used to estimate yields, process costs, and GHG emissions of a biorefinery process based on these biomasses. Within the chain options, GHG emissions were overly sensitive to cultivation input, mostly N-fertilization. This considered, GHG emissions resulted similar across different feedstock with straw/stover (averaging 13 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), sunn hemp (14 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel), and biomass sorghum (16 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel). On the other hand, the bioethanol produced from biomass sorghum (608 € Mg<sup>−1</sup> of bioethanol) was cheaper compared with straw (632 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), sunn hemp (672 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>), and stover (710 € Mg<sup>−1</sup>). The bioethanol cost ranged from 0.0017 to 0.020 € MJ<sup>−1</sup> fuel depending on the feedstock, with operations and maintenance impacting up to 90% of the final cost. In summary, a single bioethanol plant with an annual capacity of 250,000 Mg of biomass could replace from 5% to 7% of the Emilia-Romagna's ethanol fuel consumption, depending on the applied sourcing scenario.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk
Increasing lignocellulosic feedstock for advanced biofuels can tackle the decarbonization of the transport sector. Dedicated biomass produced alongside food systems with low indirect land use change (iLUC) impact can broaden the feedstock availability, thus streamlining the supply chains. The objective of this study was the design and evaluation of advanced ethanol value chains for the Emilia-Romagna region based on low iLUC feedstock. Two dedicated lignocellulosic crops (biomass sorghum and sunn hemp) were evaluated in double cropping systems alongside food crop residues (corn stover and wheat straw) as sources to simulate the value chains. A parcel-level regional analysis was carried out, then the LocaGIStics2.0 model was used for the spatial design and review of the biomass delivery chain options regarding cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the different feedstock mixes. Literature data on bioethanol production from similar feedstocks were used to estimate yields, process costs, and GHG emissions of a biorefinery process based on these biomasses. Within the chain options, GHG emissions were overly sensitive to cultivation input, mostly N-fertilization. This considered, GHG emissions resulted similar across different feedstock with straw/stover (averaging 13 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel), sunn hemp (14 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel), and biomass sorghum (16 g CO2eq MJ−1 fuel). On the other hand, the bioethanol produced from biomass sorghum (608 € Mg−1 of bioethanol) was cheaper compared with straw (632 € Mg−1), sunn hemp (672 € Mg−1), and stover (710 € Mg−1). The bioethanol cost ranged from 0.0017 to 0.020 € MJ−1 fuel depending on the feedstock, with operations and maintenance impacting up to 90% of the final cost. In summary, a single bioethanol plant with an annual capacity of 250,000 Mg of biomass could replace from 5% to 7% of the Emilia-Romagna's ethanol fuel consumption, depending on the applied sourcing scenario.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.