解开复杂的联系:具有不同功能的住宅用地如何形成城市盗窃的空间动态

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Guangwen Song , Jiaxin Zheng , Jiaxin Feng , Xiaoxue Li , Chunxia Zhang , Luzi Xiao
{"title":"解开复杂的联系:具有不同功能的住宅用地如何形成城市盗窃的空间动态","authors":"Guangwen Song ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Zheng ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Li ,&nbsp;Chunxia Zhang ,&nbsp;Luzi Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An existing disparity between the actual and planned land use function for a given parcel highlights a knowledge gap in how mixed-use residential parcels influence burglary spatial patterns. To bridge this gap, our study leverages land use data and Points of Interest (POIs) to categorize residential land into distinct types, and further explore the influence of mixed-use residential land and housing types on the spatial distribution of burglary rates. Key findings reveal that: 1) Residential land can be segmented into three distinct categories: pure residential, residential-office, and residential-commercial. 2) While a significant relationship is not observed between residential-office land and burglary, both pure residential and residential-commercial land exhibit a notable increase in burglary occurrences, with the latter exerting the most significant impact. 3) Notably, the commercial environment significantly heightens the attractiveness of high-end commercial housing for burglary, whereas for affordable housing, the commercial environment enhances its deterrent effect against burglary. This dichotomy is attributed to the spatial service scope and target clientele of commercial facilities. The findings furnish a scientific rationale for burglary prevention and control strategies across diverse community types, ultimately contributing to a safer urban environment. Furthermore, the implications of this research are applicable to cities globally grappling with the challenge of managing mixed-use residential land safety in the context of urbanization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105554"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling the complex nexus: How residential land with diverse functions shapes the spatial dynamics of urban burglary\",\"authors\":\"Guangwen Song ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Zheng ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Li ,&nbsp;Chunxia Zhang ,&nbsp;Luzi Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>An existing disparity between the actual and planned land use function for a given parcel highlights a knowledge gap in how mixed-use residential parcels influence burglary spatial patterns. To bridge this gap, our study leverages land use data and Points of Interest (POIs) to categorize residential land into distinct types, and further explore the influence of mixed-use residential land and housing types on the spatial distribution of burglary rates. Key findings reveal that: 1) Residential land can be segmented into three distinct categories: pure residential, residential-office, and residential-commercial. 2) While a significant relationship is not observed between residential-office land and burglary, both pure residential and residential-commercial land exhibit a notable increase in burglary occurrences, with the latter exerting the most significant impact. 3) Notably, the commercial environment significantly heightens the attractiveness of high-end commercial housing for burglary, whereas for affordable housing, the commercial environment enhances its deterrent effect against burglary. This dichotomy is attributed to the spatial service scope and target clientele of commercial facilities. The findings furnish a scientific rationale for burglary prevention and control strategies across diverse community types, ultimately contributing to a safer urban environment. Furthermore, the implications of this research are applicable to cities globally grappling with the challenge of managing mixed-use residential land safety in the context of urbanization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007686\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特定地块的实际土地使用功能与规划土地使用功能之间存在差异,这凸显出在混合用途住宅地块如何影响入室盗窃空间模式方面存在知识空白。为了弥补这一差距,我们的研究利用土地利用数据和兴趣点(POIs)将住宅用地划分为不同类型,并进一步探讨混合用途住宅用地和住宅类型对入室盗窃案发生率空间分布的影响。主要研究结果表明1) 住宅用地可分为三种不同类型:纯住宅用地、住宅-办公用地和住宅-商业用地。2)虽然住宅-办公用地与入室盗窃之间没有明显的关系,但纯住宅用地和住宅-商业用地的入室盗窃发生率都明显上升,其中后者的影响最大。3)值得注意的是,商业环境显著增强了高端商品房对入室盗窃的吸引力,而对于经济适用房而言,商业环境则增强了其对入室盗窃的威慑力。这种对立是由于商业设施的空间服务范围和目标客户群造成的。研究结果为不同类型社区的入室盗窃防控策略提供了科学依据,最终有助于提高城市环境的安全性。此外,这项研究的意义还适用于全球城市在城市化进程中应对混合用途住宅用地安全管理挑战的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unraveling the complex nexus: How residential land with diverse functions shapes the spatial dynamics of urban burglary
An existing disparity between the actual and planned land use function for a given parcel highlights a knowledge gap in how mixed-use residential parcels influence burglary spatial patterns. To bridge this gap, our study leverages land use data and Points of Interest (POIs) to categorize residential land into distinct types, and further explore the influence of mixed-use residential land and housing types on the spatial distribution of burglary rates. Key findings reveal that: 1) Residential land can be segmented into three distinct categories: pure residential, residential-office, and residential-commercial. 2) While a significant relationship is not observed between residential-office land and burglary, both pure residential and residential-commercial land exhibit a notable increase in burglary occurrences, with the latter exerting the most significant impact. 3) Notably, the commercial environment significantly heightens the attractiveness of high-end commercial housing for burglary, whereas for affordable housing, the commercial environment enhances its deterrent effect against burglary. This dichotomy is attributed to the spatial service scope and target clientele of commercial facilities. The findings furnish a scientific rationale for burglary prevention and control strategies across diverse community types, ultimately contributing to a safer urban environment. Furthermore, the implications of this research are applicable to cities globally grappling with the challenge of managing mixed-use residential land safety in the context of urbanization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信