{"title":"消费者对转基因食品的反应:意大利案例研究。","authors":"Federica DeMaria, Simona Romeo Lironcurti, Federica Morandi, Alessandra Pesce, Laura Gazza, Francesca Nocente","doi":"10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The agricultural sector could benefit from biotechnologies in addressing challenges such as pests, droughts, and food supply issues. Genetically modified (GM) crops have been developed to offer not only economic advantages to farmers but also to contribute positively to the environment, human health, and consumer well-being. However, consumers' hesitancy in buying GM food may stem from societal reactions to how biotechnologies in agriculture have been regulated so far. The legislative debate that led, in early 2024, to the approval of Commission's proposal (COM(2023) 411 final) - aimed at simplifying the authorization process for plants obtained with certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) - has sparkled public discussion in the European Union on the application of biotechnologies in agriculture. This work aims to investigate Italian consumers' acceptance toward GM food. Through data collected from an original survey (<i>N</i> = 564), we tested a) their level of knowledge of GM techniques; b) if they are aware of differences between established techniques based on classical approaches of crossing and selection and more precise biotechnological techniques; c) their propensity to buy GM food, with a specific focus on food safety and environmental sustainability issues. By using a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), starting from three hypotheses, the study highlights a gap in knowledge transfer and, in general, the communication process. This results in widespread misinformation that hinders informed consumer choices. The study also emphasizes consumers' sensitivity to food safety, including environmental issues, but still related to food safety issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":54282,"journal":{"name":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","volume":"15 1","pages":"303-315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.\",\"authors\":\"Federica DeMaria, Simona Romeo Lironcurti, Federica Morandi, Alessandra Pesce, Laura Gazza, Francesca Nocente\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The agricultural sector could benefit from biotechnologies in addressing challenges such as pests, droughts, and food supply issues. Genetically modified (GM) crops have been developed to offer not only economic advantages to farmers but also to contribute positively to the environment, human health, and consumer well-being. However, consumers' hesitancy in buying GM food may stem from societal reactions to how biotechnologies in agriculture have been regulated so far. The legislative debate that led, in early 2024, to the approval of Commission's proposal (COM(2023) 411 final) - aimed at simplifying the authorization process for plants obtained with certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) - has sparkled public discussion in the European Union on the application of biotechnologies in agriculture. This work aims to investigate Italian consumers' acceptance toward GM food. Through data collected from an original survey (<i>N</i> = 564), we tested a) their level of knowledge of GM techniques; b) if they are aware of differences between established techniques based on classical approaches of crossing and selection and more precise biotechnological techniques; c) their propensity to buy GM food, with a specific focus on food safety and environmental sustainability issues. By using a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), starting from three hypotheses, the study highlights a gap in knowledge transfer and, in general, the communication process. This results in widespread misinformation that hinders informed consumer choices. The study also emphasizes consumers' sensitivity to food safety, including environmental issues, but still related to food safety issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"303-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在应对虫害、干旱和粮食供应问题等挑战方面,农业部门可以从生物技术中受益。转基因作物的开发不仅为农民带来了经济利益,也为环境、人类健康和消费者福祉做出了积极贡献。然而,消费者对购买转基因食品的犹豫不决可能源于社会对迄今为止农业生物技术监管方式的反应。2024 年初,欧盟委员会的提案(COM(2023) 411 final)旨在简化通过某些新基因组技术(NGTs)获得的植物的授权程序,该提案的立法辩论引发了欧盟关于生物技术在农业中的应用的公开讨论。这项工作旨在调查意大利消费者对转基因食品的接受程度。通过原始调查收集的数据(N = 564),我们测试了 a) 消费者对转基因技术的了解程度;b) 消费者是否了解基于经典杂交和选择方法的成熟技术与更精确的生物技术之间的差异;c) 消费者购买转基因食品的倾向,特别关注食品安全和环境可持续性问题。通过使用多项式对数模型(MNL),从三个假设出发,该研究强调了知识传播和一般传播过程中的差距。这导致了广泛的错误信息,阻碍了消费者做出明智的选择。研究还强调了消费者对食品安全的敏感性,包括环境问题,但仍与食品安全问题有关。
Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.
The agricultural sector could benefit from biotechnologies in addressing challenges such as pests, droughts, and food supply issues. Genetically modified (GM) crops have been developed to offer not only economic advantages to farmers but also to contribute positively to the environment, human health, and consumer well-being. However, consumers' hesitancy in buying GM food may stem from societal reactions to how biotechnologies in agriculture have been regulated so far. The legislative debate that led, in early 2024, to the approval of Commission's proposal (COM(2023) 411 final) - aimed at simplifying the authorization process for plants obtained with certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) - has sparkled public discussion in the European Union on the application of biotechnologies in agriculture. This work aims to investigate Italian consumers' acceptance toward GM food. Through data collected from an original survey (N = 564), we tested a) their level of knowledge of GM techniques; b) if they are aware of differences between established techniques based on classical approaches of crossing and selection and more precise biotechnological techniques; c) their propensity to buy GM food, with a specific focus on food safety and environmental sustainability issues. By using a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), starting from three hypotheses, the study highlights a gap in knowledge transfer and, in general, the communication process. This results in widespread misinformation that hinders informed consumer choices. The study also emphasizes consumers' sensitivity to food safety, including environmental issues, but still related to food safety issues.
期刊介绍:
GM Crops & Food - Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain aims to publish high quality research papers, reviews, and commentaries on a wide range of topics involving genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture and genetically modified food. The journal provides a platform for research papers addressing fundamental questions in the development, testing, and application of transgenic crops. The journal further covers topics relating to socio-economic issues, commercialization, trade and societal issues. GM Crops & Food aims to provide an international forum on all issues related to GM crops, especially toward meaningful communication between scientists and policy-makers.
GM Crops & Food will publish relevant and high-impact original research with a special focus on novelty-driven studies with the potential for application. The journal also publishes authoritative review articles on current research and policy initiatives, and commentary on broad perspectives regarding genetically modified crops. The journal serves a wide readership including scientists, breeders, and policy-makers, as well as a wider community of readers (educators, policy makers, scholars, science writers and students) interested in agriculture, medicine, biotechnology, investment, and technology transfer.
Topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Production and analysis of transgenic crops
• Gene insertion studies
• Gene silencing
• Factors affecting gene expression
• Post-translational analysis
• Molecular farming
• Field trial analysis
• Commercialization of modified crops
• Safety and regulatory affairs
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
• Biofuels
• Data from field trials
• Development of transformation technology
• Elimination of pollutants (Bioremediation)
• Gene silencing mechanisms
• Genome Editing
• Herbicide resistance
• Molecular farming
• Pest resistance
• Plant reproduction (e.g., male sterility, hybrid breeding, apomixis)
• Plants with altered composition
• Tolerance to abiotic stress
• Transgenesis in agriculture
• Biofortification and nutrients improvement
• Genomic, proteomic and bioinformatics methods used for developing GM cops
ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES
• Commercialization
• Consumer attitudes
• International bodies
• National and local government policies
• Public perception, intellectual property, education, (bio)ethical issues
• Regulation, environmental impact and containment
• Socio-economic impact
• Food safety and security
• Risk assessments