老年人不参与数字健康干预研究:不均衡的参与、有偏差的结果以及加权的影响。

Arianna Poli, Ingemar Kåreholt, Susanne Kelfve, Katarina Berg, Andreas Motel-Klingebiel
{"title":"老年人不参与数字健康干预研究:不均衡的参与、有偏差的结果以及加权的影响。","authors":"Arianna Poli, Ingemar Kåreholt, Susanne Kelfve, Katarina Berg, Andreas Motel-Klingebiel","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The involvement of older adults in research on digital health is uneven with respect to e.g. age, gender, health status, and digital skills. However, little is known regarding the impact of the uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap and identifies the effects of uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes, and also develops a correction for this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are retrieved from a digital health intervention for postoperative monitoring of people who underwent day surgery in Sweden. Based on field information on the recruitment process and researched outcomes for the intervention, this study (1) tested intervention effects by using two standard unweighted procedures in a sample of 281 individuals aged 50 years or older, and then (2) used the information on participants, non-participants and their respective probabilities to be involved in the intervention study to perform a weighting of the intervention effects for each step of selection and for the study group membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention effects were found to be overestimated due to overrepresentation of groups which gained from receiving the intervention. No intervention effects were found after adjustment for participation bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective participation of older adults in digital health research biases research outcomes and can lead to overestimation of intervention effects. Weighting allows researchers to correct and describe the impact of selective participation on researched outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Participation in a Digital Health Intervention Study Among Older Adults: Uneven Involvement, Biased Outcomes and the Effect of Weighting.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Poli, Ingemar Kåreholt, Susanne Kelfve, Katarina Berg, Andreas Motel-Klingebiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glae265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The involvement of older adults in research on digital health is uneven with respect to e.g. age, gender, health status, and digital skills. However, little is known regarding the impact of the uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap and identifies the effects of uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes, and also develops a correction for this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are retrieved from a digital health intervention for postoperative monitoring of people who underwent day surgery in Sweden. Based on field information on the recruitment process and researched outcomes for the intervention, this study (1) tested intervention effects by using two standard unweighted procedures in a sample of 281 individuals aged 50 years or older, and then (2) used the information on participants, non-participants and their respective probabilities to be involved in the intervention study to perform a weighting of the intervention effects for each step of selection and for the study group membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention effects were found to be overestimated due to overrepresentation of groups which gained from receiving the intervention. No intervention effects were found after adjustment for participation bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective participation of older adults in digital health research biases research outcomes and can lead to overestimation of intervention effects. Weighting allows researchers to correct and describe the impact of selective participation on researched outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据年龄、性别、健康状况和数字技能等因素,老年人参与数字健康研究的情况并不均衡。然而,人们对老年人参与数字健康研究的不均衡性对研究成果的影响知之甚少。本研究有助于填补这一知识空白,确定老年人参与数字健康研究的不均衡性对研究成果的影响,并对此进行修正:方法:从瑞典一项针对日间手术患者术后监测的数字健康干预中获取数据。根据有关干预措施的招募过程和研究结果的实地信息,本研究(1)在 281 个 50 岁或以上的样本中使用两种标准的非加权程序测试干预效果,然后(2)使用有关参与者、非参与者及其各自参与干预研究的概率的信息,对每一步选择和研究组成员的干预效果进行加权:结果发现,由于接受干预的群体比例过高,干预效果被高估了。在对参与偏差进行调整后,没有发现干预效果:选择性地让老年人参与数字健康研究会使研究结果产生偏差,并可能导致干预效果被高估。通过加权法,研究人员可以纠正和描述选择性参与对研究结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Participation in a Digital Health Intervention Study Among Older Adults: Uneven Involvement, Biased Outcomes and the Effect of Weighting.

Background: The involvement of older adults in research on digital health is uneven with respect to e.g. age, gender, health status, and digital skills. However, little is known regarding the impact of the uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap and identifies the effects of uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes, and also develops a correction for this.

Methods: Data are retrieved from a digital health intervention for postoperative monitoring of people who underwent day surgery in Sweden. Based on field information on the recruitment process and researched outcomes for the intervention, this study (1) tested intervention effects by using two standard unweighted procedures in a sample of 281 individuals aged 50 years or older, and then (2) used the information on participants, non-participants and their respective probabilities to be involved in the intervention study to perform a weighting of the intervention effects for each step of selection and for the study group membership.

Results: The intervention effects were found to be overestimated due to overrepresentation of groups which gained from receiving the intervention. No intervention effects were found after adjustment for participation bias.

Conclusions: Selective participation of older adults in digital health research biases research outcomes and can lead to overestimation of intervention effects. Weighting allows researchers to correct and describe the impact of selective participation on researched outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信