Riham Elmahboubi, Catherine Robitaille, Céline Dupont, Julie Dallaire, Marie Létourneau, Christian Sirois, David Valenti, Anne V Gonzalez, Stéphane Beaudoin
{"title":"胸膜腔内治疗胸膜感染的质量改进措施。","authors":"Riham Elmahboubi, Catherine Robitaille, Céline Dupont, Julie Dallaire, Marie Létourneau, Christian Sirois, David Valenti, Anne V Gonzalez, Stéphane Beaudoin","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rationale Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. Objectives To assess the impact of quality improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. Methods We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Centre before (April 2013-April 2016, N=109) and after interventions (June 2020-June 2021, N=44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and pre-printed order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. Results After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but surgical management went from 14% to 0% (p=0,01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12Fr decreased from 51% to 7% (p<0,001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (p=0,004). Additional drain insertions went from 62% to 48% (p=0,12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, less doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. Conclusions Following the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Improvement Initiatives for Pleural Infection Managed with Intrapleural Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Riham Elmahboubi, Catherine Robitaille, Céline Dupont, Julie Dallaire, Marie Létourneau, Christian Sirois, David Valenti, Anne V Gonzalez, Stéphane Beaudoin\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rationale Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. Objectives To assess the impact of quality improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. Methods We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Centre before (April 2013-April 2016, N=109) and after interventions (June 2020-June 2021, N=44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and pre-printed order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. Results After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but surgical management went from 14% to 0% (p=0,01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12Fr decreased from 51% to 7% (p<0,001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (p=0,004). Additional drain insertions went from 62% to 48% (p=0,12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, less doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. Conclusions Following the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality Improvement Initiatives for Pleural Infection Managed with Intrapleural Therapy.
Rationale Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. Objectives To assess the impact of quality improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. Methods We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Centre before (April 2013-April 2016, N=109) and after interventions (June 2020-June 2021, N=44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and pre-printed order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. Results After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but surgical management went from 14% to 0% (p=0,01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12Fr decreased from 51% to 7% (p<0,001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (p=0,004). Additional drain insertions went from 62% to 48% (p=0,12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, less doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. Conclusions Following the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.