学术生物库与产业界合作的挑战与机遇:学术生物库国际调查的结果。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wohaib Hasan, Daniel Simeon-Dubach, Vanessa Tumilasci, Peter Sebbel, Suenne Orth
{"title":"学术生物库与产业界合作的挑战与机遇:学术生物库国际调查的结果。","authors":"Wohaib Hasan, Daniel Simeon-Dubach, Vanessa Tumilasci, Peter Sebbel, Suenne Orth","doi":"10.1089/bio.2023.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim of the Survey:</i></b> When it comes to collaboration between academic biobanks and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, the criteria for effective collaborations are still unclear. Researchers in industry and academic biobanks can have different incentives and requirements that the other party is often not familiar with. This survey was conducted in an attempt to increase understanding of these fundamental knowledge gaps that may be obstacles to optimal collaboration between academia and industry. <b><i>Key Findings from the Survey:</i></b> There were 53 total respondents. Although this was a global survey, most respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) were from North America, likely reflecting overall investment in research in this region and possibly increased interactions between academia and industry as well. Most respondent academic biobanks collect multiple sample types with most (>90%) collecting both biofluids (including blood) and tissue. Most of the participating academic biobanks were aware that they were not (35%), or only partially (35%), using the full potential of their inventory. One option for increasing utilization rates is by collaborating with industry partners. The main issues when working with industry were perceived to be a combination of challenges including contractual (55%), consent restrictions (45%), timelines (41%), or time pressure (36%). Time taken to put agreements together was also a significant hurdle (54%), together with the industry's administrative requirements (36%). <b><i>Brief Conclusions from the Survey:</i></b> To take advantage of opportunities for joint collaboration, it is essential that the parties involved build trust. The first step is to understand the different requirements and needs of the other party and to establish efficient structures for joint cooperation. This survey has highlighted key areas to be addressed as the next steps for strengthening bonds between academic biobanks and industry partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Between Academic Biobanks and Industry: Results of an International Survey of Academic Biobanks.\",\"authors\":\"Wohaib Hasan, Daniel Simeon-Dubach, Vanessa Tumilasci, Peter Sebbel, Suenne Orth\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bio.2023.0156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Aim of the Survey:</i></b> When it comes to collaboration between academic biobanks and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, the criteria for effective collaborations are still unclear. Researchers in industry and academic biobanks can have different incentives and requirements that the other party is often not familiar with. This survey was conducted in an attempt to increase understanding of these fundamental knowledge gaps that may be obstacles to optimal collaboration between academia and industry. <b><i>Key Findings from the Survey:</i></b> There were 53 total respondents. Although this was a global survey, most respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) were from North America, likely reflecting overall investment in research in this region and possibly increased interactions between academia and industry as well. Most respondent academic biobanks collect multiple sample types with most (>90%) collecting both biofluids (including blood) and tissue. Most of the participating academic biobanks were aware that they were not (35%), or only partially (35%), using the full potential of their inventory. One option for increasing utilization rates is by collaborating with industry partners. The main issues when working with industry were perceived to be a combination of challenges including contractual (55%), consent restrictions (45%), timelines (41%), or time pressure (36%). Time taken to put agreements together was also a significant hurdle (54%), together with the industry's administrative requirements (36%). <b><i>Brief Conclusions from the Survey:</i></b> To take advantage of opportunities for joint collaboration, it is essential that the parties involved build trust. The first step is to understand the different requirements and needs of the other party and to establish efficient structures for joint cooperation. This survey has highlighted key areas to be addressed as the next steps for strengthening bonds between academic biobanks and industry partners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2023.0156\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2023.0156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查目的:关于学术生物库与制药/生物技术行业之间的合作,有效合作的标准仍不明确。行业和学术生物库的研究人员可能有不同的激励机制和要求,而对方往往并不熟悉这些激励机制和要求。本调查旨在加深对这些基本知识差距的了解,这些差距可能会阻碍学术界和产业界之间的最佳合作。调查的主要结果:共有 53 位受访者。虽然这是一项全球性调查,但大多数受访者(n = 29)来自北美,这可能反映了该地区在研究方面的总体投资情况,也可能反映了学术界与产业界之间互动的增加。大多数受访的学术生物库收集多种类型的样本,其中大多数(超过 90%)同时收集生物流体(包括血液)和组织。大多数参与调查的学术生物库都意识到,他们没有(35%)或仅部分(35%)利用其库存的全部潜力。提高利用率的一个办法是与行业伙伴合作。与业界合作时遇到的主要问题被认为是各种挑战的组合,包括合同(55%)、同意限制(45%)、时限(41%)或时间压力(36%)。达成协议所需的时间也是一大障碍(54%),此外还有行业的行政要求(36%)。调查简要结论:要利用联合协作的机会,有关各方必须建立信任。第一步是了解对方的不同要求和需求,并建立高效的联合合作结构。本次调查强调了下一步加强学术生物库与行业合作伙伴之间联系的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Between Academic Biobanks and Industry: Results of an International Survey of Academic Biobanks.

Aim of the Survey: When it comes to collaboration between academic biobanks and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, the criteria for effective collaborations are still unclear. Researchers in industry and academic biobanks can have different incentives and requirements that the other party is often not familiar with. This survey was conducted in an attempt to increase understanding of these fundamental knowledge gaps that may be obstacles to optimal collaboration between academia and industry. Key Findings from the Survey: There were 53 total respondents. Although this was a global survey, most respondents (n = 29) were from North America, likely reflecting overall investment in research in this region and possibly increased interactions between academia and industry as well. Most respondent academic biobanks collect multiple sample types with most (>90%) collecting both biofluids (including blood) and tissue. Most of the participating academic biobanks were aware that they were not (35%), or only partially (35%), using the full potential of their inventory. One option for increasing utilization rates is by collaborating with industry partners. The main issues when working with industry were perceived to be a combination of challenges including contractual (55%), consent restrictions (45%), timelines (41%), or time pressure (36%). Time taken to put agreements together was also a significant hurdle (54%), together with the industry's administrative requirements (36%). Brief Conclusions from the Survey: To take advantage of opportunities for joint collaboration, it is essential that the parties involved build trust. The first step is to understand the different requirements and needs of the other party and to establish efficient structures for joint cooperation. This survey has highlighted key areas to be addressed as the next steps for strengthening bonds between academic biobanks and industry partners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信