比较不同类型注射器在泵送输液过程中造成的污染。

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000560
Yutaka Kawakami, Takashi Tagami
{"title":"比较不同类型注射器在泵送输液过程中造成的污染。","authors":"Yutaka Kawakami, Takashi Tagami","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care providers use several types of syringes in their daily routine to provide or safely deliver therapeutic agents to patients. Pump infusion with a syringe (PIS) are used for the rapid delivery of large amounts of fluid or blood to patients in critical conditions, such as hypovolemic shock. Patients often experience bacterial infections, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, specifically when they are in critical condition in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery or undergoing resuscitation in an emergency department. A previous study has shown that PIS may cause intraluminal contamination. This study compared PIS-induced contamination among different types of available syringes, including disposable plastic syringes produced by several companies, glass syringes, and syringes with plastic covers. The authors found that plastic syringes caused approximately equivalent PIS-induced contamination and that glass syringes caused substantially more contamination than plastic syringes. However, syringes equipped with a plastic cover exhibited no contamination. Furthermore, disinfection with ethanol completely prevented PIS-induced contamination. This study supports the evidence that PIS may cause bacterial contamination and that a thorough aseptic technique is needed, especially when using glass syringes. These findings highlight the need to develop alternative devices for rapid infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Pumping Infusion-Induced Contamination With Different Syringe Types.\",\"authors\":\"Yutaka Kawakami, Takashi Tagami\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health care providers use several types of syringes in their daily routine to provide or safely deliver therapeutic agents to patients. Pump infusion with a syringe (PIS) are used for the rapid delivery of large amounts of fluid or blood to patients in critical conditions, such as hypovolemic shock. Patients often experience bacterial infections, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, specifically when they are in critical condition in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery or undergoing resuscitation in an emergency department. A previous study has shown that PIS may cause intraluminal contamination. This study compared PIS-induced contamination among different types of available syringes, including disposable plastic syringes produced by several companies, glass syringes, and syringes with plastic covers. The authors found that plastic syringes caused approximately equivalent PIS-induced contamination and that glass syringes caused substantially more contamination than plastic syringes. However, syringes equipped with a plastic cover exhibited no contamination. Furthermore, disinfection with ethanol completely prevented PIS-induced contamination. This study supports the evidence that PIS may cause bacterial contamination and that a thorough aseptic technique is needed, especially when using glass syringes. These findings highlight the need to develop alternative devices for rapid infusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infusion Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infusion Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗服务提供者在日常工作中使用多种类型的注射器为患者提供或安全输送治疗药物。带注射器的泵输液(PIS)用于向低血容量休克等危重病人快速输送大量液体或血液。患者经常会受到细菌感染,如导管相关血流感染,特别是在手术后重症监护室(ICU)或急诊科接受抢救时。之前的一项研究表明,PIS 可能会导致管腔内污染。本研究比较了不同类型注射器(包括多家公司生产的一次性塑料注射器、玻璃注射器和带塑料盖的注射器)的 PIS 引起的污染。作者发现,塑料注射器造成的 PIS 引起的污染大致相当,而玻璃注射器造成的污染要比塑料注射器多得多。但是,装有塑料盖的注射器没有污染。此外,用乙醇消毒可完全防止 PIS 引起的污染。这项研究证实了 PIS 可能会导致细菌污染,因此需要采用彻底的无菌技术,尤其是在使用玻璃注射器时。这些发现凸显了开发快速输液替代设备的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Pumping Infusion-Induced Contamination With Different Syringe Types.

Health care providers use several types of syringes in their daily routine to provide or safely deliver therapeutic agents to patients. Pump infusion with a syringe (PIS) are used for the rapid delivery of large amounts of fluid or blood to patients in critical conditions, such as hypovolemic shock. Patients often experience bacterial infections, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, specifically when they are in critical condition in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery or undergoing resuscitation in an emergency department. A previous study has shown that PIS may cause intraluminal contamination. This study compared PIS-induced contamination among different types of available syringes, including disposable plastic syringes produced by several companies, glass syringes, and syringes with plastic covers. The authors found that plastic syringes caused approximately equivalent PIS-induced contamination and that glass syringes caused substantially more contamination than plastic syringes. However, syringes equipped with a plastic cover exhibited no contamination. Furthermore, disinfection with ethanol completely prevented PIS-induced contamination. This study supports the evidence that PIS may cause bacterial contamination and that a thorough aseptic technique is needed, especially when using glass syringes. These findings highlight the need to develop alternative devices for rapid infusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信