Chanbeom Kwak, Yuseon Byun, Sunghwa You, Junghee Sagong, Do-Yun Kim, Wan-Ho Cho, Tae Hoon Kong, Soo Hee Oh, In-Ki Jin, Michelle J Suh, Hyo-Jeong Lee, Seong Jun Choi, Dongchul Cha, Kyung-Ho Park, Young Joon Seo
{"title":"了解听性脑干反应的标准程序:标准数据的重要性","authors":"Chanbeom Kwak, Yuseon Byun, Sunghwa You, Junghee Sagong, Do-Yun Kim, Wan-Ho Cho, Tae Hoon Kong, Soo Hee Oh, In-Ki Jin, Michelle J Suh, Hyo-Jeong Lee, Seong Jun Choi, Dongchul Cha, Kyung-Ho Park, Young Joon Seo","doi":"10.7874/jao.2024.00458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a noninvasive test that measures neural activity in response to auditory stimuli. Racial differences in head shape have provided strong evidence for specific normative data and accurate device calibration. International standards emphasize the need for standardized procedures and references. This study aimed to outline the standard procedure and related normative ABR values. Standard procedures were performed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. Five studies from two countries were included to compare the normative values of the ABR. The dataset from the National Standard Reference Data Center (NSRDC) was used as reference. Normative values were described in terms of stimuli, latency, and amplitude. For click stimuli, the latency of the ABR showed different patterns across populations, such as those from Korea and the USA. Although the latencies reported by the NSRDC and for Koreans were relatively short, those reported for USA populations were longer. Using clicks, it was shown that the USA population had the largest ABR amplitude compared to those reported for the other two datasets. For Wave V latency using tone bursts, a similar pattern was identified with click stimuli. Frequency-specific trends were also observed. Although there is a lack of ABR datasets, the information and insights of the present study could be utilized as standard guidelines in research on ABR.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Standard Procedure in Auditory Brainstem Response: Importance of Normative Data.\",\"authors\":\"Chanbeom Kwak, Yuseon Byun, Sunghwa You, Junghee Sagong, Do-Yun Kim, Wan-Ho Cho, Tae Hoon Kong, Soo Hee Oh, In-Ki Jin, Michelle J Suh, Hyo-Jeong Lee, Seong Jun Choi, Dongchul Cha, Kyung-Ho Park, Young Joon Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/jao.2024.00458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a noninvasive test that measures neural activity in response to auditory stimuli. Racial differences in head shape have provided strong evidence for specific normative data and accurate device calibration. International standards emphasize the need for standardized procedures and references. This study aimed to outline the standard procedure and related normative ABR values. Standard procedures were performed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. Five studies from two countries were included to compare the normative values of the ABR. The dataset from the National Standard Reference Data Center (NSRDC) was used as reference. Normative values were described in terms of stimuli, latency, and amplitude. For click stimuli, the latency of the ABR showed different patterns across populations, such as those from Korea and the USA. Although the latencies reported by the NSRDC and for Koreans were relatively short, those reported for USA populations were longer. Using clicks, it was shown that the USA population had the largest ABR amplitude compared to those reported for the other two datasets. For Wave V latency using tone bursts, a similar pattern was identified with click stimuli. Frequency-specific trends were also observed. Although there is a lack of ABR datasets, the information and insights of the present study could be utilized as standard guidelines in research on ABR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2024.00458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2024.00458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
听性脑干反应(ABR)是一种无创测试,用于测量神经活动对听觉刺激的反应。头型的种族差异为特定的标准数据和精确的设备校准提供了有力的证据。国际标准强调了标准化程序和参考的必要性。本研究旨在概述标准程序和相关的 ABR 标准值。标准程序根据国际电工委员会 (IEC) 标准执行。为比较 ABR 的规范值,纳入了来自两个国家的五项研究。国家标准参考数据中心 (NSRDC) 的数据集被用作参考。标准值按刺激、潜伏期和振幅进行描述。对于点击刺激,ABR 的潜伏期在韩国和美国等不同人群中表现出不同的模式。虽然韩国国家研究与发展中心和韩国人的潜伏期相对较短,但美国人的潜伏期则较长。使用单击显示,与其他两个数据集相比,美国人群的 ABR 振幅最大。在使用音爆的第五波潜伏期方面,也发现了与点击刺激类似的模式。还观察到特定频率的趋势。虽然缺乏 ABR 数据集,但本研究的信息和见解可用作 ABR 研究的标准指南。
Understanding Standard Procedure in Auditory Brainstem Response: Importance of Normative Data.
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a noninvasive test that measures neural activity in response to auditory stimuli. Racial differences in head shape have provided strong evidence for specific normative data and accurate device calibration. International standards emphasize the need for standardized procedures and references. This study aimed to outline the standard procedure and related normative ABR values. Standard procedures were performed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. Five studies from two countries were included to compare the normative values of the ABR. The dataset from the National Standard Reference Data Center (NSRDC) was used as reference. Normative values were described in terms of stimuli, latency, and amplitude. For click stimuli, the latency of the ABR showed different patterns across populations, such as those from Korea and the USA. Although the latencies reported by the NSRDC and for Koreans were relatively short, those reported for USA populations were longer. Using clicks, it was shown that the USA population had the largest ABR amplitude compared to those reported for the other two datasets. For Wave V latency using tone bursts, a similar pattern was identified with click stimuli. Frequency-specific trends were also observed. Although there is a lack of ABR datasets, the information and insights of the present study could be utilized as standard guidelines in research on ABR.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.