数字化制造方法对陶瓷牙冠精度的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sultan Ainoosah, Marwa S Alzemei, Osama A Bagabas, Tahani M Binaljadm, Ahmed E Farghal, Ahmad A Alnazzawi, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed A Alghauli
{"title":"数字化制造方法对陶瓷牙冠精度的影响。","authors":"Sultan Ainoosah, Marwa S Alzemei, Osama A Bagabas, Tahani M Binaljadm, Ahmed E Farghal, Ahmad A Alnazzawi, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed A Alghauli","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b5814196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of full coverage crowns produced by two manufacturing methods: additive 3D printing and subtractive milling utilizing three different predefined cement spaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six groups were allocated based on the manufacturing method and the predefined cement space: printed wax with a 20 µm space (PW1); printed wax with a 50 µm space (PW2); printed wax with a 100 µm space (PW3); milled wax with a 20 µm cement space (MW1); milled wax with a 50 µm cement space (MW2); milled wax with a 100 µm cement space (MW3); milled zirconia coping with a 20 µm cement space (MZ1); milled zirconia coping with a 50 µm cement space (MZ2); milled zirconia with a 100 µm cement space (MZ3). All fabricated specimens were scanned using an Identica Blue 3D scanner and saved as standard tessellation language (STL) files. A triple scan method was performed using 3-matic software to assess accuracy. The discrepancy values were recorded in micrometers, and the analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wax printing method, with a cement gap design of 100 μm, demonstrated a significant improvement in the accuracy compared to the other methods (P<.01). In contrast, the zirconia milling method exhibited significantly lower accuracy relative to the other techniques (P<0.01). Moreover, different cement spaces resulted in various accuracy levels but the only statistically significant difference was observed for the 100 µm cement space in the printed wax group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additive 3D printing method exhibited greater accuracy than the subtractive milling approach. Furthermore, altering the cement gap was found to impact the accuracy of both techniques, albeit without statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The accuracy of each CAM technique was investigated in this study, highlighting the promising accuracy of 3D-printed patterns for the lost-wax technique over direct crown milling. However, all methods produced reliable and accurate crown restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Digital Manufacturing Methods on the Accuracy of Ceramic Crowns.\",\"authors\":\"Sultan Ainoosah, Marwa S Alzemei, Osama A Bagabas, Tahani M Binaljadm, Ahmed E Farghal, Ahmad A Alnazzawi, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed A Alghauli\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b5814196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of full coverage crowns produced by two manufacturing methods: additive 3D printing and subtractive milling utilizing three different predefined cement spaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six groups were allocated based on the manufacturing method and the predefined cement space: printed wax with a 20 µm space (PW1); printed wax with a 50 µm space (PW2); printed wax with a 100 µm space (PW3); milled wax with a 20 µm cement space (MW1); milled wax with a 50 µm cement space (MW2); milled wax with a 100 µm cement space (MW3); milled zirconia coping with a 20 µm cement space (MZ1); milled zirconia coping with a 50 µm cement space (MZ2); milled zirconia with a 100 µm cement space (MZ3). All fabricated specimens were scanned using an Identica Blue 3D scanner and saved as standard tessellation language (STL) files. A triple scan method was performed using 3-matic software to assess accuracy. The discrepancy values were recorded in micrometers, and the analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wax printing method, with a cement gap design of 100 μm, demonstrated a significant improvement in the accuracy compared to the other methods (P<.01). In contrast, the zirconia milling method exhibited significantly lower accuracy relative to the other techniques (P<0.01). Moreover, different cement spaces resulted in various accuracy levels but the only statistically significant difference was observed for the 100 µm cement space in the printed wax group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additive 3D printing method exhibited greater accuracy than the subtractive milling approach. Furthermore, altering the cement gap was found to impact the accuracy of both techniques, albeit without statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The accuracy of each CAM technique was investigated in this study, highlighting the promising accuracy of 3D-printed patterns for the lost-wax technique over direct crown milling. However, all methods produced reliable and accurate crown restorations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b5814196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b5814196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是评估利用三种不同的预定义骨水泥空间,通过增材三维打印和减材铣削两种制造方法生产的全覆盖牙冠的准确性:根据制造方法和预定义骨水泥间隙分配了六组:20微米间距的打印蜡(PW1);50微米间距的打印蜡(PW2);100微米间距的打印蜡(PW3);20微米骨水泥间距的铣削蜡(MW1);50微米骨水泥间距的铣削蜡(MW2);具有 100 微米骨水泥间隙的磨制蜡(MW3);具有 20 微米骨水泥间隙的磨制氧化锆牙托(MZ1);具有 50 微米骨水泥间隙的磨制氧化锆牙托(MZ2);具有 100 微米骨水泥间隙的磨制氧化锆牙托(MZ3)。所有制作好的试样均使用 Identica Blue 3D 扫描仪进行扫描,并保存为标准网格语言 (STL) 文件。使用 3-matic 软件进行三重扫描,以评估精度。差异值以微米为单位记录,并使用单因素方差分析进行分析:结果:与其他方法相比,水泥间隙设计为 100 μm 的蜡打印方法在精确度上有显著提高(PC 结论:增材三维打印方法的精确度更高:添加式三维打印方法比减法铣削方法的精度更高。此外,改变骨水泥间隙也会影响这两种技术的准确性,尽管没有统计学意义:临床意义:本研究对每种 CAM 技术的准确性进行了调查,结果表明,失蜡技术的三维打印模式比直接牙冠铣削技术的准确性更高。不过,所有方法都能制作出可靠、准确的牙冠修复体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Digital Manufacturing Methods on the Accuracy of Ceramic Crowns.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of full coverage crowns produced by two manufacturing methods: additive 3D printing and subtractive milling utilizing three different predefined cement spaces.

Materials and methods: Six groups were allocated based on the manufacturing method and the predefined cement space: printed wax with a 20 µm space (PW1); printed wax with a 50 µm space (PW2); printed wax with a 100 µm space (PW3); milled wax with a 20 µm cement space (MW1); milled wax with a 50 µm cement space (MW2); milled wax with a 100 µm cement space (MW3); milled zirconia coping with a 20 µm cement space (MZ1); milled zirconia coping with a 50 µm cement space (MZ2); milled zirconia with a 100 µm cement space (MZ3). All fabricated specimens were scanned using an Identica Blue 3D scanner and saved as standard tessellation language (STL) files. A triple scan method was performed using 3-matic software to assess accuracy. The discrepancy values were recorded in micrometers, and the analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA.

Results: The wax printing method, with a cement gap design of 100 μm, demonstrated a significant improvement in the accuracy compared to the other methods (P<.01). In contrast, the zirconia milling method exhibited significantly lower accuracy relative to the other techniques (P<0.01). Moreover, different cement spaces resulted in various accuracy levels but the only statistically significant difference was observed for the 100 µm cement space in the printed wax group.

Conclusion: The additive 3D printing method exhibited greater accuracy than the subtractive milling approach. Furthermore, altering the cement gap was found to impact the accuracy of both techniques, albeit without statistical significance.

Clinical significance: The accuracy of each CAM technique was investigated in this study, highlighting the promising accuracy of 3D-printed patterns for the lost-wax technique over direct crown milling. However, all methods produced reliable and accurate crown restorations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信