伊朗奶牛场与自愿等待期相关的管理措施及其对奶牛繁殖性能影响的调查研究。

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Behnaz Mirzaie, Ali Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, Mahdi Zhandi
{"title":"伊朗奶牛场与自愿等待期相关的管理措施及其对奶牛繁殖性能影响的调查研究。","authors":"Behnaz Mirzaie, Ali Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, Mahdi Zhandi","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary waiting period (VWP), housing systems and the presence of a veterinarian are effective factors on reproductive performance of a dairy farm.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the management practices associated with VWP and its effects on reproductive performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136,943 records of 21,756 cows that calved between 1990 and 2013 were used. A questionnaire was also conducted with the farms involved to determine if they adjust the timing of insemination based on the body condition score (BCS) of the cows, postpartum health situation (PPHS) or environmental factors such as heat stress and season. The impact of changing the VWP selectively, the presence of a veterinarian and the type of barn on reproductive outcomes like days open (DO), number of services per conception (NSPC) and days to first service (DFS) was examined using a linear mixed model. This model considered animals and herds as random factors and management practices as fixed factors in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among herds that reported altering the VWP based on heat stress, DFS significantly increased (61.68 ± 0.68 vs. 58.4 ± 0.83) while DO (119.70 ± 1.86 vs. 126.9 ± 2.29) and NSPC (1.98 ± 0.04 vs. 2.48 ± 0.05) reduced compared to herds that did not alter the VWP. Our results showed that farms with a full-time veterinarian had a better reproductive performance than those with part-time care (p < 0.05). Housing system was significantly associated with fertility traits, so that cows in free-stall barns were more fertile than those kept in open-shed barns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The obtained results from this study indicated that management decisions to selectively altering the VWP led to difference in DFS and improved reproductive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"10 6","pages":"e70107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey Study on Management Practices Associated With Voluntary Waiting Period and Its Effects on Reproductive Performance of dairy cows in Iranian Dairy Farms.\",\"authors\":\"Behnaz Mirzaie, Ali Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, Mahdi Zhandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/vms3.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary waiting period (VWP), housing systems and the presence of a veterinarian are effective factors on reproductive performance of a dairy farm.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the management practices associated with VWP and its effects on reproductive performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136,943 records of 21,756 cows that calved between 1990 and 2013 were used. A questionnaire was also conducted with the farms involved to determine if they adjust the timing of insemination based on the body condition score (BCS) of the cows, postpartum health situation (PPHS) or environmental factors such as heat stress and season. The impact of changing the VWP selectively, the presence of a veterinarian and the type of barn on reproductive outcomes like days open (DO), number of services per conception (NSPC) and days to first service (DFS) was examined using a linear mixed model. This model considered animals and herds as random factors and management practices as fixed factors in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among herds that reported altering the VWP based on heat stress, DFS significantly increased (61.68 ± 0.68 vs. 58.4 ± 0.83) while DO (119.70 ± 1.86 vs. 126.9 ± 2.29) and NSPC (1.98 ± 0.04 vs. 2.48 ± 0.05) reduced compared to herds that did not alter the VWP. Our results showed that farms with a full-time veterinarian had a better reproductive performance than those with part-time care (p < 0.05). Housing system was significantly associated with fertility traits, so that cows in free-stall barns were more fertile than those kept in open-shed barns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The obtained results from this study indicated that management decisions to selectively altering the VWP led to difference in DFS and improved reproductive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Medicine and Science\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"e70107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Medicine and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自愿等待期(VWP)、饲养系统和兽医的存在是影响奶牛场繁殖性能的有效因素:本研究旨在调查与自愿等待期相关的管理措施及其对繁殖性能的影响:研究使用了 1990 年至 2013 年间产犊的 21,756 头奶牛的 136,943 份记录。还对相关牧场进行了问卷调查,以确定他们是否根据奶牛体况评分(BCS)、产后健康状况(PPHS)或热应激和季节等环境因素调整授精时间。采用线性混合模型研究了有选择地改变VWP、兽医在场和牛舍类型对繁殖结果的影响,如开放天数(DO)、每次受孕服务次数(NSPC)和首次服务天数(DFS)。该模型将动物和牛群作为随机因素,将管理方法作为固定因素进行分析:结果:与未改变VWP的牛群相比,报告根据热应激改变VWP的牛群中,DFS显著增加(61.68 ± 0.68 vs. 58.4 ± 0.83),而DO(119.70 ± 1.86 vs. 126.9 ± 2.29)和NSPC(1.98 ± 0.04 vs. 2.48 ± 0.05)则有所减少。我们的研究结果表明,配备全职兽医的猪场比配备兼职兽医的猪场繁殖性能更好(p < 0.05)。牛舍系统与繁殖力特征有明显相关性,因此自由堆放牛舍的奶牛比开放式牛舍的奶牛繁殖力更强:本研究的结果表明,选择性改变VWP的管理决策会导致DFS的差异和繁殖性能的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey Study on Management Practices Associated With Voluntary Waiting Period and Its Effects on Reproductive Performance of dairy cows in Iranian Dairy Farms.

Background: Voluntary waiting period (VWP), housing systems and the presence of a veterinarian are effective factors on reproductive performance of a dairy farm.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the management practices associated with VWP and its effects on reproductive performance.

Methods: A total of 136,943 records of 21,756 cows that calved between 1990 and 2013 were used. A questionnaire was also conducted with the farms involved to determine if they adjust the timing of insemination based on the body condition score (BCS) of the cows, postpartum health situation (PPHS) or environmental factors such as heat stress and season. The impact of changing the VWP selectively, the presence of a veterinarian and the type of barn on reproductive outcomes like days open (DO), number of services per conception (NSPC) and days to first service (DFS) was examined using a linear mixed model. This model considered animals and herds as random factors and management practices as fixed factors in the analysis.

Results: Among herds that reported altering the VWP based on heat stress, DFS significantly increased (61.68 ± 0.68 vs. 58.4 ± 0.83) while DO (119.70 ± 1.86 vs. 126.9 ± 2.29) and NSPC (1.98 ± 0.04 vs. 2.48 ± 0.05) reduced compared to herds that did not alter the VWP. Our results showed that farms with a full-time veterinarian had a better reproductive performance than those with part-time care (p < 0.05). Housing system was significantly associated with fertility traits, so that cows in free-stall barns were more fertile than those kept in open-shed barns.

Conclusions: The obtained results from this study indicated that management decisions to selectively altering the VWP led to difference in DFS and improved reproductive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Veterinary Medicine and Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell. Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信