{"title":"食管胃交界处腺癌术前估计食管侵犯长度的准确性及其与病理测量的差异。","authors":"Yoshiaki Tomi, Takahiro Kinoshita, Masahiro Yura, Naoya Sakamoto, Takeo Fujita, Masanori Tokunaga, Yusuke Kinugasa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02955-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has increased worldwide. As the EGJ is located at the boundary between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, the optimal surgical approach is a subject of debate and estimation of the esophageal invasion length (EIL) is an important factor in its selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from our in-house database were extracted for consecutive patients with Siewert type I, II and III EGJ adenocarcinoma (EIL ≤ 4 cm), who underwent transhiatal or transthoracic surgical resection between 2010 and 2016. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed and the accuracy of EIL estimation and its discrepancy with the pathological measurement were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 patients were included in the final analysis. We established that EIL was underestimated in 49 of these patients (59.8%). The mean-distance discrepancy between the preoperative and pathological diagnosis of EIL in the underestimation group was 7.0 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that submucosal cancer spread was an independent risk factor for underestimation (P < 0.01). The mean length of submucosal cancer spread was longer for undifferentiated histologic type EGJ adenocarcinomas. (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EIL was underestimated in approximately 60% of EGJ adenocarcinomas requiring surgical treatment. Thus, careful management is necessary, especially for EGJ adenocarcinoma of the undifferentiated histologic type.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"768-777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of the preoperative estimation of esophageal invasion length of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and its discrepancy with the pathological measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiaki Tomi, Takahiro Kinoshita, Masahiro Yura, Naoya Sakamoto, Takeo Fujita, Masanori Tokunaga, Yusuke Kinugasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-024-02955-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has increased worldwide. As the EGJ is located at the boundary between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, the optimal surgical approach is a subject of debate and estimation of the esophageal invasion length (EIL) is an important factor in its selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from our in-house database were extracted for consecutive patients with Siewert type I, II and III EGJ adenocarcinoma (EIL ≤ 4 cm), who underwent transhiatal or transthoracic surgical resection between 2010 and 2016. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed and the accuracy of EIL estimation and its discrepancy with the pathological measurement were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 patients were included in the final analysis. We established that EIL was underestimated in 49 of these patients (59.8%). The mean-distance discrepancy between the preoperative and pathological diagnosis of EIL in the underestimation group was 7.0 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that submucosal cancer spread was an independent risk factor for underestimation (P < 0.01). The mean length of submucosal cancer spread was longer for undifferentiated histologic type EGJ adenocarcinomas. (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EIL was underestimated in approximately 60% of EGJ adenocarcinomas requiring surgical treatment. Thus, careful management is necessary, especially for EGJ adenocarcinoma of the undifferentiated histologic type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"768-777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02955-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02955-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:食管胃交界处(EGJ)腺癌的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。由于食管胃交界处位于胸腔和腹腔的交界处,最佳的手术方式一直是争论的焦点,而食管侵犯长度(EIL)的估计是选择手术方式的重要因素:从我们的内部数据库中提取了2010年至2016年期间接受经食管或经胸腔手术切除的Siewert I、II和III型食管胃腺癌(EIL ≤ 4厘米)连续患者的数据。研究人员回顾了这些患者的临床记录,并分析了EIL估计的准确性及其与病理测量的差异:共有82名患者纳入最终分析。结果:最终分析共纳入 82 例患者,其中 49 例(59.8%)的 EIL 被低估。低估组 EIL 术前诊断与病理诊断的平均距离差异为 7.0 毫米。多变量分析显示,粘膜下癌扩散是导致低估的一个独立风险因素(P 结论:EIL被低估的几率很小:约有 60% 需要手术治疗的 EGJ 腺癌的 EIL 被低估。因此,必须谨慎处理,尤其是未分化组织学类型的 EGJ 腺癌。
Accuracy of the preoperative estimation of esophageal invasion length of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and its discrepancy with the pathological measurement.
Purpose: The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has increased worldwide. As the EGJ is located at the boundary between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, the optimal surgical approach is a subject of debate and estimation of the esophageal invasion length (EIL) is an important factor in its selection.
Methods: Data from our in-house database were extracted for consecutive patients with Siewert type I, II and III EGJ adenocarcinoma (EIL ≤ 4 cm), who underwent transhiatal or transthoracic surgical resection between 2010 and 2016. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed and the accuracy of EIL estimation and its discrepancy with the pathological measurement were analyzed.
Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the final analysis. We established that EIL was underestimated in 49 of these patients (59.8%). The mean-distance discrepancy between the preoperative and pathological diagnosis of EIL in the underestimation group was 7.0 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that submucosal cancer spread was an independent risk factor for underestimation (P < 0.01). The mean length of submucosal cancer spread was longer for undifferentiated histologic type EGJ adenocarcinomas. (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: The EIL was underestimated in approximately 60% of EGJ adenocarcinomas requiring surgical treatment. Thus, careful management is necessary, especially for EGJ adenocarcinoma of the undifferentiated histologic type.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.