使用三种常用诱捕器和一种新设计的诱捕器采样的蚊子种类组合比较。

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Loyal P Hall, Jiayue Yan, Chris M Stone, Thomas C Baker
{"title":"使用三种常用诱捕器和一种新设计的诱捕器采样的蚊子种类组合比较。","authors":"Loyal P Hall, Jiayue Yan, Chris M Stone, Thomas C Baker","doi":"10.2987/23-7110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In nuisance or vector mosquito management, effective sampling is a stepping stone to efficient use of resources, targeted control efforts, and successful reduction of disease transmission. Experimental evidence indicates that there are species biases for certain traps, which in turn implies that the traps used will influence the species make-up of samples collected. A comparative study between 3 CO2-baited light traps and 2 hay-infusion baited gravid traps-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap, American BioPhysics Company (ABC) light trap, Reiter-Cummings (RC) gravid trap, and a convertible gravid/light trap with a novel design-was conducted to test for species specificity of each trap type. It was found that different species of mosquitoes are more likely to be collected in greater numbers with certain traps compared to others, even between the different light traps or gravid traps. In particular, Coquillettidia perturbans tended to be collected in greater numbers with CDC light traps, Culex salinarius tended to be collected in greater numbers with the experimental convertible light traps, and Culex pipiens tended to be collected in greater numbers with the Reiters-Cummings gravid traps over the other traps included in the study (P ≤ 0.05). The overall species richness of samples was comparable among trap types, with similar performance of the new trap designs as established designs (P ≤ 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison Of Mosquito Species Assemblages Sampled With Three Commonly Used Traps And A Novel Design.\",\"authors\":\"Loyal P Hall, Jiayue Yan, Chris M Stone, Thomas C Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.2987/23-7110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In nuisance or vector mosquito management, effective sampling is a stepping stone to efficient use of resources, targeted control efforts, and successful reduction of disease transmission. Experimental evidence indicates that there are species biases for certain traps, which in turn implies that the traps used will influence the species make-up of samples collected. A comparative study between 3 CO2-baited light traps and 2 hay-infusion baited gravid traps-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap, American BioPhysics Company (ABC) light trap, Reiter-Cummings (RC) gravid trap, and a convertible gravid/light trap with a novel design-was conducted to test for species specificity of each trap type. It was found that different species of mosquitoes are more likely to be collected in greater numbers with certain traps compared to others, even between the different light traps or gravid traps. In particular, Coquillettidia perturbans tended to be collected in greater numbers with CDC light traps, Culex salinarius tended to be collected in greater numbers with the experimental convertible light traps, and Culex pipiens tended to be collected in greater numbers with the Reiters-Cummings gravid traps over the other traps included in the study (P ≤ 0.05). The overall species richness of samples was comparable among trap types, with similar performance of the new trap designs as established designs (P ≤ 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2987/23-7110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/23-7110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在有害蚊虫或病媒蚊虫管理中,有效取样是高效利用资源、有针对性地开展控制工作和成功减少疾病传播的基石。实验证据表明,某些诱捕器存在物种偏差,这反过来又意味着所使用的诱捕器会影响所采集样本的物种构成。我们对 3 种二氧化碳诱饵的灯光诱捕器和 2 种干草灌注诱饵的雌蚊诱捕器--疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的灯光诱捕器、美国生物物理公司(ABC)的灯光诱捕器、Reiter-Cummings(RC)的雌蚊诱捕器和一种设计新颖的可转换雌蚊/灯光诱捕器--进行了比较研究,以测试每种诱捕器的物种特异性。结果发现,与其他诱捕器相比,某些诱捕器更有可能收集到更多不同种类的蚊子,即使在不同的灯光诱捕器或雌蚊诱捕器之间也是如此。特别是,使用 CDC 灯光诱捕器收集到的百日咳库蚊数量更多,使用实验性可转换灯光诱捕器收集到的盐库蚊数量更多,而使用 Reiters-Cummings 有柄诱捕器收集到的琵鹭库蚊数量往往多于研究中的其他诱捕器(P ≤ 0.05)。不同类型诱捕器采集到的样本物种丰富度相当,新设计的诱捕器与老设计的诱捕器性能相似(P ≤ 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison Of Mosquito Species Assemblages Sampled With Three Commonly Used Traps And A Novel Design.

In nuisance or vector mosquito management, effective sampling is a stepping stone to efficient use of resources, targeted control efforts, and successful reduction of disease transmission. Experimental evidence indicates that there are species biases for certain traps, which in turn implies that the traps used will influence the species make-up of samples collected. A comparative study between 3 CO2-baited light traps and 2 hay-infusion baited gravid traps-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap, American BioPhysics Company (ABC) light trap, Reiter-Cummings (RC) gravid trap, and a convertible gravid/light trap with a novel design-was conducted to test for species specificity of each trap type. It was found that different species of mosquitoes are more likely to be collected in greater numbers with certain traps compared to others, even between the different light traps or gravid traps. In particular, Coquillettidia perturbans tended to be collected in greater numbers with CDC light traps, Culex salinarius tended to be collected in greater numbers with the experimental convertible light traps, and Culex pipiens tended to be collected in greater numbers with the Reiters-Cummings gravid traps over the other traps included in the study (P ≤ 0.05). The overall species richness of samples was comparable among trap types, with similar performance of the new trap designs as established designs (P ≤ 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for publication as a supplement to the regular issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信