经颅直流电刺激顶叶后皮层可提高视觉工作记忆中的非目标检索能力

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-11-14 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024
Shengfeng Ye, Menglin Wu, Congyun Yao, Gui Xue, Ying Cai
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激顶叶后皮层可提高视觉工作记忆中的非目标检索能力","authors":"Shengfeng Ye, Menglin Wu, Congyun Yao, Gui Xue, Ying Cai","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual working memory (VWM) requires precise feature binding. Previous studies have revealed a close relationship between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and feature binding during VWM; this study further examined their causal relationship through three transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) experiments. In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 57), participants underwent three sessions of tDCS separately, including PPC stimulation, occipital cortex stimulation, and sham stimulation, and completed delayed estimation tasks for orientations before and after stimulation. Results showed that tDCS over PPC selectively prolonged recall response time (RT) and increased the probability of nontarget responses (a.k.a. failure of feature binding, <i>p</i>NT). In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 29), combining metacognition estimation, we further investigated whether the effects of PPC stimulation were attributed to misbinding (i.e., participants self-reported \"remembered\" in nontarget responses) or informed guessing trials (participants self-reported \"forgotten\" in nontarget responses). We replicated the main findings in Experiment 1 and observed greater tDCS effects of PPC on RT in informed guessing trials while there are comparable effects on <i>p</i>NT in these two types of trials. In Experiment 3 (<i>N</i> = 28), we then examined whether the tDCS effects over PPC specifically influenced the memory retrieval process by using a change detection task. We found that PPC stimulation did not influence the recognition RT or accuracy. Together, this study provided direct causal evidence supporting the specific involvement of PPC in feature binding during VWM retrieval, from both aspects of speed and response preference, expanding our understanding of the neural basis of feature binding in VWM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases Nontarget Retrieval during Visual Working Memory.\",\"authors\":\"Shengfeng Ye, Menglin Wu, Congyun Yao, Gui Xue, Ying Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual working memory (VWM) requires precise feature binding. Previous studies have revealed a close relationship between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and feature binding during VWM; this study further examined their causal relationship through three transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) experiments. In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 57), participants underwent three sessions of tDCS separately, including PPC stimulation, occipital cortex stimulation, and sham stimulation, and completed delayed estimation tasks for orientations before and after stimulation. Results showed that tDCS over PPC selectively prolonged recall response time (RT) and increased the probability of nontarget responses (a.k.a. failure of feature binding, <i>p</i>NT). In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 29), combining metacognition estimation, we further investigated whether the effects of PPC stimulation were attributed to misbinding (i.e., participants self-reported \\\"remembered\\\" in nontarget responses) or informed guessing trials (participants self-reported \\\"forgotten\\\" in nontarget responses). We replicated the main findings in Experiment 1 and observed greater tDCS effects of PPC on RT in informed guessing trials while there are comparable effects on <i>p</i>NT in these two types of trials. In Experiment 3 (<i>N</i> = 28), we then examined whether the tDCS effects over PPC specifically influenced the memory retrieval process by using a change detection task. We found that PPC stimulation did not influence the recognition RT or accuracy. Together, this study provided direct causal evidence supporting the specific involvement of PPC in feature binding during VWM retrieval, from both aspects of speed and response preference, expanding our understanding of the neural basis of feature binding in VWM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0265-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉工作记忆(VWM)需要精确的特征绑定。以往的研究表明,在视觉工作记忆过程中,后顶叶皮层(PPC)与特征绑定之间存在密切关系,本研究通过三次经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)实验进一步研究了它们之间的因果关系。在实验 1(57 人)中,受试者分别接受了三次 tDCS 刺激,包括 PPC 刺激、枕叶皮层刺激和假刺激,并在刺激前后完成了方位延迟估计任务。结果表明,PPC上的tDCS选择性地延长了回忆反应时间(RT),并增加了非目标反应的概率(又称特征结合失败,pNT)。在实验 2(N = 29)中,结合元认知估计,我们进一步研究了 PPC 刺激的效果是否归因于错误结合(即参与者自我报告在非目标反应中 "记住了")或知情猜测试验(参与者自我报告在非目标反应中 "忘记了")。我们复制了实验 1 中的主要发现,观察到在知情猜测试验中 PPC 对 RT 的 tDCS 影响更大,而在这两类试验中对 pNT 的影响相当。在实验 3(N = 28)中,我们使用一项变化检测任务,考察了 tDCS 对 PPC 的影响是否具体影响了记忆检索过程。我们发现,PPC 刺激不会影响识别的 RT 或准确性。总之,这项研究从速度和反应偏好两方面提供了直接的因果关系证据,支持了PPC在VWM检索过程中特异性地参与了特征绑定,拓展了我们对VWM中特征绑定的神经基础的理解。越来越多的研究认为后顶叶皮层(PPC)与这一结合过程密切相关,本研究进一步探讨了它们之间的因果关系。通过三个严格的受试内精心设计的非侵入性神经刺激实验,我们发现,在 VWM 过程中,顶叶后皮层刺激会选择性地增加反应时间(RT)和绑定错误。此外,我们还发现这些变化受到个体元认知的调节,并且只发生在记忆回忆而非识别过程中。总之,我们的研究结果提供了强有力的证据,证明在视觉工作记忆检索过程中,PPC与结合过程有因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases Nontarget Retrieval during Visual Working Memory.

Visual working memory (VWM) requires precise feature binding. Previous studies have revealed a close relationship between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and feature binding during VWM; this study further examined their causal relationship through three transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) experiments. In Experiment 1 (N = 57), participants underwent three sessions of tDCS separately, including PPC stimulation, occipital cortex stimulation, and sham stimulation, and completed delayed estimation tasks for orientations before and after stimulation. Results showed that tDCS over PPC selectively prolonged recall response time (RT) and increased the probability of nontarget responses (a.k.a. failure of feature binding, pNT). In Experiment 2 (N = 29), combining metacognition estimation, we further investigated whether the effects of PPC stimulation were attributed to misbinding (i.e., participants self-reported "remembered" in nontarget responses) or informed guessing trials (participants self-reported "forgotten" in nontarget responses). We replicated the main findings in Experiment 1 and observed greater tDCS effects of PPC on RT in informed guessing trials while there are comparable effects on pNT in these two types of trials. In Experiment 3 (N = 28), we then examined whether the tDCS effects over PPC specifically influenced the memory retrieval process by using a change detection task. We found that PPC stimulation did not influence the recognition RT or accuracy. Together, this study provided direct causal evidence supporting the specific involvement of PPC in feature binding during VWM retrieval, from both aspects of speed and response preference, expanding our understanding of the neural basis of feature binding in VWM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信