育龄妇女接种 Covid-19 疫苗与月经出血紊乱:挪威登记研究。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maria C Magnus, Ida H Caspersen, Knut-Arne Wensaas, Helena N Eide, Anne K Örtqvist, Laura Oakley, Per Magnus, Siri E Håberg
{"title":"育龄妇女接种 Covid-19 疫苗与月经出血紊乱:挪威登记研究。","authors":"Maria C Magnus, Ida H Caspersen, Knut-Arne Wensaas, Helena N Eide, Anne K Örtqvist, Laura Oakley, Per Magnus, Siri E Håberg","doi":"10.1007/s10654-024-01170-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the relationship between Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual bleeding disturbances using a large national registry linkage including 666,467 women between 20 and 40 years of age residing in Norway on January 1st, 2019. Information on vaccination-BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 - was obtained from the Norwegian vaccination registry. Diagnoses of menstrual disturbances (absent/scanty, excessive, irregular/frequent menstruation, and intermenstrual bleeding) was obtained from the general practitioner database. We examined new-onset menstrual bleeding disturbances using a Cox regression comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated women, where women contributed follow-up time as unvaccinated until the day of vaccination. In addition, we conducted a self-controlled case-series analysis, and a sensitivity analysis excluding all those who remained unvaccinated throughout the pandemic, to evaluate the role of unmeasured confounding. We observed an increased risk of several menstrual bleeding disturbances after vaccination against Covid-19, ranging from an adjusted HR (aHR) of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.33) for intermenstrual bleeding to 1.29 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.36) for irregular/frequent menstrual periods. However, estimates were fully attenuated when excluding women who remained unvaccinated at the end of follow-up (aHRs between 0.97 and 1.08). No differences were identified according to vaccine dose or type. Our self-controlled case series analysis confirmed no increased risk after a first dose of vaccination, though there was a slightly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances from 61 days after vaccination with dose 2. In conclusion, the modestly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances after Covid-19 vaccination appeared to reflect a role of unmeasured confounding by women who never received Covid-19 vaccinations, as associations did not remain when risk after vaccination were compared to risk before vaccination among ever vaccinated women.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual bleeding disturbances among women of fertile age: a Norwegian registry study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria C Magnus, Ida H Caspersen, Knut-Arne Wensaas, Helena N Eide, Anne K Örtqvist, Laura Oakley, Per Magnus, Siri E Håberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10654-024-01170-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the relationship between Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual bleeding disturbances using a large national registry linkage including 666,467 women between 20 and 40 years of age residing in Norway on January 1st, 2019. Information on vaccination-BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 - was obtained from the Norwegian vaccination registry. Diagnoses of menstrual disturbances (absent/scanty, excessive, irregular/frequent menstruation, and intermenstrual bleeding) was obtained from the general practitioner database. We examined new-onset menstrual bleeding disturbances using a Cox regression comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated women, where women contributed follow-up time as unvaccinated until the day of vaccination. In addition, we conducted a self-controlled case-series analysis, and a sensitivity analysis excluding all those who remained unvaccinated throughout the pandemic, to evaluate the role of unmeasured confounding. We observed an increased risk of several menstrual bleeding disturbances after vaccination against Covid-19, ranging from an adjusted HR (aHR) of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.33) for intermenstrual bleeding to 1.29 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.36) for irregular/frequent menstrual periods. However, estimates were fully attenuated when excluding women who remained unvaccinated at the end of follow-up (aHRs between 0.97 and 1.08). No differences were identified according to vaccine dose or type. Our self-controlled case series analysis confirmed no increased risk after a first dose of vaccination, though there was a slightly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances from 61 days after vaccination with dose 2. In conclusion, the modestly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances after Covid-19 vaccination appeared to reflect a role of unmeasured confounding by women who never received Covid-19 vaccinations, as associations did not remain when risk after vaccination were compared to risk before vaccination among ever vaccinated women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01170-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01170-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过一项大型全国性登记联系,评估了Covid-19疫苗接种与月经出血紊乱之间的关系,该登记联系包括2019年1月1日居住在挪威的666467名20至40岁女性。有关疫苗接种-BNT162b2和mRNA-1273的信息来自挪威疫苗接种登记处。月经紊乱(月经缺失/稀少、月经过多、月经不调/月经频发和月经间期出血)的诊断信息来自全科医生数据库。我们对已接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的妇女进行了 Cox 回归比较,研究了新发月经出血紊乱的情况。此外,我们还进行了一项自控病例序列分析和一项敏感性分析,排除了所有在整个大流行期间未接种疫苗的妇女,以评估未测量混杂因素的作用。我们观察到,接种 Covid-19 疫苗后,出现几种月经出血紊乱的风险会增加,其中月经间期出血的调整 HR (aHR) 为 1.18(95% CI:1.04,1.33),月经不调/月经过多的调整 HR (aHR) 为 1.29(95% CI:1.23,1.36)。然而,如果排除在随访结束时仍未接种疫苗的妇女,估计值则完全减弱(aHR 在 0.97 和 1.08 之间)。没有发现疫苗剂量或类型的差异。我们的自控病例系列分析证实,接种第一剂疫苗后风险并没有增加,但接种第二剂疫苗后 61 天内出现月经出血紊乱的风险略有增加。总之,接种Covid-19疫苗后月经出血紊乱的风险略有增加,这似乎反映了从未接种过Covid-19疫苗的妇女造成的未测量混淆的作用,因为将接种疫苗后的风险与曾经接种过疫苗的妇女接种疫苗前的风险进行比较时,两者之间的关联并不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual bleeding disturbances among women of fertile age: a Norwegian registry study.

This study evaluated the relationship between Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual bleeding disturbances using a large national registry linkage including 666,467 women between 20 and 40 years of age residing in Norway on January 1st, 2019. Information on vaccination-BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 - was obtained from the Norwegian vaccination registry. Diagnoses of menstrual disturbances (absent/scanty, excessive, irregular/frequent menstruation, and intermenstrual bleeding) was obtained from the general practitioner database. We examined new-onset menstrual bleeding disturbances using a Cox regression comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated women, where women contributed follow-up time as unvaccinated until the day of vaccination. In addition, we conducted a self-controlled case-series analysis, and a sensitivity analysis excluding all those who remained unvaccinated throughout the pandemic, to evaluate the role of unmeasured confounding. We observed an increased risk of several menstrual bleeding disturbances after vaccination against Covid-19, ranging from an adjusted HR (aHR) of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.33) for intermenstrual bleeding to 1.29 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.36) for irregular/frequent menstrual periods. However, estimates were fully attenuated when excluding women who remained unvaccinated at the end of follow-up (aHRs between 0.97 and 1.08). No differences were identified according to vaccine dose or type. Our self-controlled case series analysis confirmed no increased risk after a first dose of vaccination, though there was a slightly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances from 61 days after vaccination with dose 2. In conclusion, the modestly increased risk of menstrual bleeding disturbances after Covid-19 vaccination appeared to reflect a role of unmeasured confounding by women who never received Covid-19 vaccinations, as associations did not remain when risk after vaccination were compared to risk before vaccination among ever vaccinated women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Epidemiology
European Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信