缝合星状角膜裂伤的新技术

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cornea Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003730
Steven E Brooks, Alex Johnson, Emily A Kreuger
{"title":"缝合星状角膜裂伤的新技术","authors":"Steven E Brooks, Alex Johnson, Emily A Kreuger","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study was performed to evaluate and optimize a novel technique to close stellate corneal lacerations in a wet laboratory environment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-one ex vivo porcine eyes with standardized, experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations were assigned to one of three surgical repair techniques. In Group 1 (n = 9), lacerations were closed with simple interrupted sutures only. In Group 2 (n = 7), a large-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. In Group 3 (n = 5), a small-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. Wound stability was assessed by determining the intraocular pressure (IOP) at which wound leak occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 3 eyes demonstrated a mean wound leak IOP of 56.1 mm Hg (range 32-90.3) compared with groups 1 and 2, which demonstrated mean wound leak IOPs of 6.4 mm Hg (range 1.9-19) and 13.3 mm Hg (range 2.8-31), respectively. These differences were highly statistically significant ( P  < 0.002 and P  < 0.015, respectively, compared with Group 3).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of a small-radius internal purse-string suture, when combined with simple interrupted sutures, produced a highly effective watertight closure in experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations, significantly outperforming approaches using only interrupted sutures or a large-radius purse string. The use of a small-radius purse-string suture should be considered for clinical use in the repair of stellate corneal lacerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":"522-524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Technique to Close Stellate Corneal Lacerations.\",\"authors\":\"Steven E Brooks, Alex Johnson, Emily A Kreuger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study was performed to evaluate and optimize a novel technique to close stellate corneal lacerations in a wet laboratory environment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-one ex vivo porcine eyes with standardized, experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations were assigned to one of three surgical repair techniques. In Group 1 (n = 9), lacerations were closed with simple interrupted sutures only. In Group 2 (n = 7), a large-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. In Group 3 (n = 5), a small-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. Wound stability was assessed by determining the intraocular pressure (IOP) at which wound leak occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 3 eyes demonstrated a mean wound leak IOP of 56.1 mm Hg (range 32-90.3) compared with groups 1 and 2, which demonstrated mean wound leak IOPs of 6.4 mm Hg (range 1.9-19) and 13.3 mm Hg (range 2.8-31), respectively. These differences were highly statistically significant ( P  < 0.002 and P  < 0.015, respectively, compared with Group 3).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of a small-radius internal purse-string suture, when combined with simple interrupted sutures, produced a highly effective watertight closure in experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations, significantly outperforming approaches using only interrupted sutures or a large-radius purse string. The use of a small-radius purse-string suture should be considered for clinical use in the repair of stellate corneal lacerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"522-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003730\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和优化在湿实验室环境下闭合星状角膜裂伤的新技术:21 只活体猪眼睛上的星状角膜裂伤是通过实验制作的标准化角膜裂伤,我们将其分配给三种手术修复技术中的一种。第一组(9 人)仅用简单的间断缝合法缝合裂口。第二组(n = 7)在简单间断缝合的基础上,使用大半径中央缝合线。在第 3 组(n = 5)中,除了简单间断缝合外,还使用了小半径中央荷包线。通过确定发生伤口渗漏时的眼压来评估伤口的稳定性:结果:第 3 组的平均伤口渗漏眼压为 56.1 毫米汞柱(范围为 32-90.3),而第 1 组和第 2 组的平均伤口渗漏眼压分别为 6.4 毫米汞柱(范围为 1.9-19)和 13.3 毫米汞柱(范围为 2.8-31)。这些差异具有高度统计学意义(P 讨论):使用小半径内荷包线缝合,再加上简单的间断缝合,可在实验性星状角膜裂伤中实现高效的水密性闭合,明显优于仅使用间断缝合或大半径荷包线的方法。在修复星状角膜裂伤的临床应用中,应考虑使用小半径荷包线缝合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Technique to Close Stellate Corneal Lacerations.

Purpose: The study was performed to evaluate and optimize a novel technique to close stellate corneal lacerations in a wet laboratory environment.

Materials and methods: Twenty-one ex vivo porcine eyes with standardized, experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations were assigned to one of three surgical repair techniques. In Group 1 (n = 9), lacerations were closed with simple interrupted sutures only. In Group 2 (n = 7), a large-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. In Group 3 (n = 5), a small-radius central purse string was used in addition to simple interrupted sutures. Wound stability was assessed by determining the intraocular pressure (IOP) at which wound leak occurred.

Results: Group 3 eyes demonstrated a mean wound leak IOP of 56.1 mm Hg (range 32-90.3) compared with groups 1 and 2, which demonstrated mean wound leak IOPs of 6.4 mm Hg (range 1.9-19) and 13.3 mm Hg (range 2.8-31), respectively. These differences were highly statistically significant ( P  < 0.002 and P  < 0.015, respectively, compared with Group 3).

Discussion: The use of a small-radius internal purse-string suture, when combined with simple interrupted sutures, produced a highly effective watertight closure in experimentally created stellate corneal lacerations, significantly outperforming approaches using only interrupted sutures or a large-radius purse string. The use of a small-radius purse-string suture should be considered for clinical use in the repair of stellate corneal lacerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信