在体力要求较高的职业中使用个人降温衣进行热应激管理的实际考虑因素:采用现实主义评估方法进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily J Tetzlaff, Leonidas G Ioannou, Fergus K O'Connor, Antonia Kaltsatou, Valentina Ly, Glen P Kenny
{"title":"在体力要求较高的职业中使用个人降温衣进行热应激管理的实际考虑因素:采用现实主义评估方法进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Emily J Tetzlaff, Leonidas G Ioannou, Fergus K O'Connor, Antonia Kaltsatou, Valentina Ly, Glen P Kenny","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to rising temperature extremes, workplaces are seeking new solutions, such as using personal cooling garments (PCG) to mitigate and manage workplace heat exposure. This systematic review sought to assess the physiological and perceptual effects of PCGs on workers in standard work clothing performing moderate-to-heavy intensity tasks in hot environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A peer-reviewed search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health, and Business Source Complete with no language or time limits. A meta-analysis using a realist evaluation framework was then performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the PCGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies with 764 participants (98% male; average 21 ± 34 participants per study), conducted primarily in a laboratory setting (76%) were included. The studies were 193 ± 190 min in duration and consisted of a moderate-to-heavy work effort of 3.3 ± 1.0 METs in hot ambient conditions (temperature: 35.9 ± 3.3°C, 51.4 ± 12.1% relative humidity, wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT] 31.2 ± 2.6°C). The PCGs (n = 67) facilitated heat exchange through conduction (n = 39), evaporation (n = 4), convection (n = 2), radiation (n = 2), or hybrid combinations (n = 20). Conductive and hybrid PCGs offered the greatest thermoregulatory benefit, whereby core temperature (T<sub>c</sub>) and heart rate (HR) reductions were consistently observed (Conductive: T<sub>c</sub>: -0.3°C, HR: -12 bpm; Hybrid: T<sub>c:</sub>:-0.2°C, HR: -10 bpm), while PCGs directed at enhancing evaporative and radiative heat exchange had no or minimal effect on the physiological outcomes assessed (i.e., T<sub>C</sub> < 0.1°C, HR: <0.7 bpm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the PCGs had a positive overall effect, conductive options offered the most consistent benefit to workers. WBGT, clothing insulation, and duration of wear significantly affected some physiological and perceptual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical considerations for using personal cooling garments for heat stress management in physically demanding occupations: A systematic review and meta-analysis using realist evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Emily J Tetzlaff, Leonidas G Ioannou, Fergus K O'Connor, Antonia Kaltsatou, Valentina Ly, Glen P Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajim.23672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to rising temperature extremes, workplaces are seeking new solutions, such as using personal cooling garments (PCG) to mitigate and manage workplace heat exposure. This systematic review sought to assess the physiological and perceptual effects of PCGs on workers in standard work clothing performing moderate-to-heavy intensity tasks in hot environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A peer-reviewed search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health, and Business Source Complete with no language or time limits. A meta-analysis using a realist evaluation framework was then performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the PCGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies with 764 participants (98% male; average 21 ± 34 participants per study), conducted primarily in a laboratory setting (76%) were included. The studies were 193 ± 190 min in duration and consisted of a moderate-to-heavy work effort of 3.3 ± 1.0 METs in hot ambient conditions (temperature: 35.9 ± 3.3°C, 51.4 ± 12.1% relative humidity, wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT] 31.2 ± 2.6°C). The PCGs (n = 67) facilitated heat exchange through conduction (n = 39), evaporation (n = 4), convection (n = 2), radiation (n = 2), or hybrid combinations (n = 20). Conductive and hybrid PCGs offered the greatest thermoregulatory benefit, whereby core temperature (T<sub>c</sub>) and heart rate (HR) reductions were consistently observed (Conductive: T<sub>c</sub>: -0.3°C, HR: -12 bpm; Hybrid: T<sub>c:</sub>:-0.2°C, HR: -10 bpm), while PCGs directed at enhancing evaporative and radiative heat exchange had no or minimal effect on the physiological outcomes assessed (i.e., T<sub>C</sub> < 0.1°C, HR: <0.7 bpm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the PCGs had a positive overall effect, conductive options offered the most consistent benefit to workers. WBGT, clothing insulation, and duration of wear significantly affected some physiological and perceptual outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于极端温度不断升高,工作场所正在寻求新的解决方案,例如使用个人降温衣(PCG)来减轻和管理工作场所的热暴露。本系统综述旨在评估个人降温衣对穿着标准工作服在炎热环境中执行中等至高强度任务的工人的生理和感知影响:在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、Global Health 和 Business Source Complete 中采用同行评议检索策略,没有语言或时间限制。然后采用现实主义评估框架进行了荟萃分析,以评估 PCGs 的有效性:共纳入 33 项研究,764 名参与者(98% 为男性;平均每项研究 21 ± 34 名参与者),主要在实验室环境中进行(76%)。研究持续时间为 193 ± 190 分钟,包括在炎热环境条件下进行 3.3 ± 1.0 METs 的中度至重度工作(温度:35.9 ± 3.3 摄氏度):温度:35.9 ± 3.3°C,相对湿度 51.4 ± 12.1%,湿球温度 [WBGT] 31.2 ± 2.6°C)。PCG (n = 67)通过传导(n = 39)、蒸发(n = 4)、对流(n = 2)、辐射(n = 2)或混合组合(n = 20)促进热交换。传导式和混合式 PCG 对体温调节的益处最大,核心温度(Tc)和心率(HR)持续下降(传导式:Tc:-0.3°C,HR:-12 bpm;混合式:Tc::-0.2°C,HR:-10 bpm),而旨在增强蒸发式和辐射式热交换的 PCG 对所评估的生理结果(即 TC)没有影响或影响甚微:虽然 PCGs 总体上有积极的影响,但传导性选择对工人的益处最为一致。WBGT、衣物隔热性能和穿着时间对某些生理和感知结果有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical considerations for using personal cooling garments for heat stress management in physically demanding occupations: A systematic review and meta-analysis using realist evaluation.

Introduction: Due to rising temperature extremes, workplaces are seeking new solutions, such as using personal cooling garments (PCG) to mitigate and manage workplace heat exposure. This systematic review sought to assess the physiological and perceptual effects of PCGs on workers in standard work clothing performing moderate-to-heavy intensity tasks in hot environments.

Methods: A peer-reviewed search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health, and Business Source Complete with no language or time limits. A meta-analysis using a realist evaluation framework was then performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the PCGs.

Results: Thirty-three studies with 764 participants (98% male; average 21 ± 34 participants per study), conducted primarily in a laboratory setting (76%) were included. The studies were 193 ± 190 min in duration and consisted of a moderate-to-heavy work effort of 3.3 ± 1.0 METs in hot ambient conditions (temperature: 35.9 ± 3.3°C, 51.4 ± 12.1% relative humidity, wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT] 31.2 ± 2.6°C). The PCGs (n = 67) facilitated heat exchange through conduction (n = 39), evaporation (n = 4), convection (n = 2), radiation (n = 2), or hybrid combinations (n = 20). Conductive and hybrid PCGs offered the greatest thermoregulatory benefit, whereby core temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) reductions were consistently observed (Conductive: Tc: -0.3°C, HR: -12 bpm; Hybrid: Tc::-0.2°C, HR: -10 bpm), while PCGs directed at enhancing evaporative and radiative heat exchange had no or minimal effect on the physiological outcomes assessed (i.e., TC < 0.1°C, HR: <0.7 bpm).

Conclusion: While the PCGs had a positive overall effect, conductive options offered the most consistent benefit to workers. WBGT, clothing insulation, and duration of wear significantly affected some physiological and perceptual outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信