Thorben Pape, Tabea von Garrel, Anna M Hunkemöller, Bahar Nalbant, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Benjamin Heidrich, Andrea Schneider, Richard Taubert, Thomas von Hahn, Heiner Wedemeyer, Benjamin Seeliger, Henrike Lenzen, Klaus Stahl
{"title":"肝移植术后胆汁淤积症患者的经皮经肝胆管引流术。","authors":"Thorben Pape, Tabea von Garrel, Anna M Hunkemöller, Bahar Nalbant, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Benjamin Heidrich, Andrea Schneider, Richard Taubert, Thomas von Hahn, Heiner Wedemeyer, Benjamin Seeliger, Henrike Lenzen, Klaus Stahl","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Biliary strictures are among the most common complications following liver transplantation (LT). If endoscopic retrograde cholangiography fails, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) may serve as an alternative approach. Description of clinical important short- and long-term outcomes as well as outcome prediction following PTBD after LT are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed outcomes of 56 liver-transplanted adults with biliary complications receiving a PTBD. We described the safety and longitudinal laboratory changes. We analyzed as endpoints, incidence of biliary complications, need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT and overall-survival at 12- and 60-months. We used simple comparison tests accordingly and performed competing risk analysis and multivariate competing risk regression as well as log-rank test and cox proportional hazard regression for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTBD procedures had a high technical success rate (98%) and tolerable safety profile. Multiple laboratory indicators improved during follow-up (37 patients with complete biochemical follow-up). Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of present biliary strictures (Anastomotic stricture (AS): adjusted SHR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.78, p = 0.016). Need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT remained below 15%. 12-month survival was significantly better, if drainage into the small intestine was achieved at first attempt compared to completely external drainage (internal: 92.9 vs. external: 67.9%, p = 0.018). Patients with AS had a numerically higher long-term-survival and higher C-reactive-protein (CRP) and lower body-mass-index (BMI) at baseline were significantly associated with inferior short- and long-term-survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTBD for biliary complications following LT had a high technical success and a tolerable safety profile. Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of biliary strictures and increased mortality was found in patients with higher CRP, lower BMI and failure of initial PTBD internalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with cholestasis following liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Thorben Pape, Tabea von Garrel, Anna M Hunkemöller, Bahar Nalbant, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Benjamin Heidrich, Andrea Schneider, Richard Taubert, Thomas von Hahn, Heiner Wedemeyer, Benjamin Seeliger, Henrike Lenzen, Klaus Stahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04657-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Biliary strictures are among the most common complications following liver transplantation (LT). If endoscopic retrograde cholangiography fails, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) may serve as an alternative approach. Description of clinical important short- and long-term outcomes as well as outcome prediction following PTBD after LT are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed outcomes of 56 liver-transplanted adults with biliary complications receiving a PTBD. We described the safety and longitudinal laboratory changes. We analyzed as endpoints, incidence of biliary complications, need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT and overall-survival at 12- and 60-months. We used simple comparison tests accordingly and performed competing risk analysis and multivariate competing risk regression as well as log-rank test and cox proportional hazard regression for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTBD procedures had a high technical success rate (98%) and tolerable safety profile. Multiple laboratory indicators improved during follow-up (37 patients with complete biochemical follow-up). Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of present biliary strictures (Anastomotic stricture (AS): adjusted SHR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.78, p = 0.016). Need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT remained below 15%. 12-month survival was significantly better, if drainage into the small intestine was achieved at first attempt compared to completely external drainage (internal: 92.9 vs. external: 67.9%, p = 0.018). Patients with AS had a numerically higher long-term-survival and higher C-reactive-protein (CRP) and lower body-mass-index (BMI) at baseline were significantly associated with inferior short- and long-term-survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTBD for biliary complications following LT had a high technical success and a tolerable safety profile. Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of biliary strictures and increased mortality was found in patients with higher CRP, lower BMI and failure of initial PTBD internalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04657-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04657-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:胆道狭窄是肝移植(LT)术后最常见的并发症之一。如果内镜逆行胆管造影术失败,经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTBD)可作为一种替代方法。有关经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTBD)的重要短期和长期临床结果以及结果预测的描述很少:方法:我们分析了56例接受PTBD的肝移植成人胆道并发症患者的治疗效果。我们描述了安全性和纵向实验室变化。我们将胆道并发症的发生率、手术胆道翻修/再LT的需求以及12个月和60个月的总体存活率作为终点进行分析。我们使用了相应的简单比较测试,并进行了竞争风险分析、多变量竞争风险回归以及对数秩检验和考克斯比例危险回归进行进一步分析:PTBD手术的技术成功率高(98%),安全性良好。随访期间多项实验室指标均有所改善(37 名患者接受了完整的生化随访)。后续胆道并发症的发生率与现有胆道狭窄的性质有很大关系(吻合口狭窄(AS):调整后的SHR:0.26,95% CI:0.09-0.78,P = 0.016)。手术胆道翻修/再LT的需求保持在15%以下。与完全体外引流相比,如果能在首次尝试时将胆汁引流至小肠,则患者的12个月生存率明显更高(内引流:92.9% vs. 外引流:67.9%,p = 0.018)。强直性脊柱炎患者的长期生存率更高,基线时较高的C反应蛋白(CRP)和较低的体重指数(BMI)与较差的短期和长期生存率明显相关:结论:针对LT术后胆道并发症的PTBD技术成功率较高,安全性也可以承受。结论:LT术后采用PTBD治疗胆道并发症的技术成功率较高,安全性也较好,但后续胆道并发症的发生率与胆道狭窄的性质密切相关,CRP较高、体重指数(BMI)较低和初次PTBD内固定失败的患者死亡率较高。
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with cholestasis following liver transplantation.
Purpose: Biliary strictures are among the most common complications following liver transplantation (LT). If endoscopic retrograde cholangiography fails, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) may serve as an alternative approach. Description of clinical important short- and long-term outcomes as well as outcome prediction following PTBD after LT are scarce.
Methods: We analyzed outcomes of 56 liver-transplanted adults with biliary complications receiving a PTBD. We described the safety and longitudinal laboratory changes. We analyzed as endpoints, incidence of biliary complications, need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT and overall-survival at 12- and 60-months. We used simple comparison tests accordingly and performed competing risk analysis and multivariate competing risk regression as well as log-rank test and cox proportional hazard regression for further analysis.
Results: PTBD procedures had a high technical success rate (98%) and tolerable safety profile. Multiple laboratory indicators improved during follow-up (37 patients with complete biochemical follow-up). Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of present biliary strictures (Anastomotic stricture (AS): adjusted SHR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.78, p = 0.016). Need for surgical biliary revision/re-LT remained below 15%. 12-month survival was significantly better, if drainage into the small intestine was achieved at first attempt compared to completely external drainage (internal: 92.9 vs. external: 67.9%, p = 0.018). Patients with AS had a numerically higher long-term-survival and higher C-reactive-protein (CRP) and lower body-mass-index (BMI) at baseline were significantly associated with inferior short- and long-term-survival.
Conclusion: PTBD for biliary complications following LT had a high technical success and a tolerable safety profile. Incidence of subsequent biliary complications was highly dependent on the nature of biliary strictures and increased mortality was found in patients with higher CRP, lower BMI and failure of initial PTBD internalization.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits