{"title":"急性心肌梗死的全身免疫炎症反应指数(SIIRI)。","authors":"Ghazi Muheeb, Jamal Yusuf, Vimal Mehta, Md Faizuddin, Sumod Kurian, Girish M P, Mohit Dayal Gupta, Safal Safal, Ankur Gautam, Narendra Kumar Chauhan","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different treatment approaches exist for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This study assessed the systemic immune inflammatory response index (SIIRI) for its prognostic value and incremental clinical utility in determining optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients, particularly when troponin levels are initially negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1270 ACS patients: 437 STEMI, 422 NSTEMI, and 411 unstable angina. Patients were stratified by SIIRI levels measured at admission, and coronary artery disease severity was evaluated using the SYNTAX score. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. Secondary endpoints encompassed individual MACE components and heart failure hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 54.93 years (83% male). SIIRI levels were significantly higher in STEMI patients (6.83 ± 6.43 × 105) compared to NSTEMI (4.5 ± 5.39 × 105) and unstable angina (3.48 ± 2.83 × 105) (P < 0.001). Area under the curve for SIIRI distinguished NSTEMI and unstable angina from STEMI (0.81 and 0.80), with optimal cut-off points of 4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105. In NSTEMI, 24.6% presented within 2 h of symptom onset, were troponin-negative, yet had elevated SIIRI. Post-PCI, SIIRI > 4.93 × 105 correlated with increased MACE at 1 year (17.2% vs 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NSTEMI and unstable angina patients with SIIRI values >4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105 respectively, may require urgent intervention (<2 h). SIIRI can be of significant utility in patients of NSTEMI who present earlier with negative troponins. SIIRI can also aid in identifying high-risk individuals post-PCI, providing a valuable tool for early and accurate assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic immune inflammatory response index (SIIRI) in acute myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Ghazi Muheeb, Jamal Yusuf, Vimal Mehta, Md Faizuddin, Sumod Kurian, Girish M P, Mohit Dayal Gupta, Safal Safal, Ankur Gautam, Narendra Kumar Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different treatment approaches exist for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This study assessed the systemic immune inflammatory response index (SIIRI) for its prognostic value and incremental clinical utility in determining optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients, particularly when troponin levels are initially negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1270 ACS patients: 437 STEMI, 422 NSTEMI, and 411 unstable angina. Patients were stratified by SIIRI levels measured at admission, and coronary artery disease severity was evaluated using the SYNTAX score. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. Secondary endpoints encompassed individual MACE components and heart failure hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 54.93 years (83% male). SIIRI levels were significantly higher in STEMI patients (6.83 ± 6.43 × 105) compared to NSTEMI (4.5 ± 5.39 × 105) and unstable angina (3.48 ± 2.83 × 105) (P < 0.001). Area under the curve for SIIRI distinguished NSTEMI and unstable angina from STEMI (0.81 and 0.80), with optimal cut-off points of 4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105. In NSTEMI, 24.6% presented within 2 h of symptom onset, were troponin-negative, yet had elevated SIIRI. Post-PCI, SIIRI > 4.93 × 105 correlated with increased MACE at 1 year (17.2% vs 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NSTEMI and unstable angina patients with SIIRI values >4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105 respectively, may require urgent intervention (<2 h). SIIRI can be of significant utility in patients of NSTEMI who present earlier with negative troponins. SIIRI can also aid in identifying high-risk individuals post-PCI, providing a valuable tool for early and accurate assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systemic immune inflammatory response index (SIIRI) in acute myocardial infarction.
Background: Different treatment approaches exist for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This study assessed the systemic immune inflammatory response index (SIIRI) for its prognostic value and incremental clinical utility in determining optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients, particularly when troponin levels are initially negative.
Methods: This study included 1270 ACS patients: 437 STEMI, 422 NSTEMI, and 411 unstable angina. Patients were stratified by SIIRI levels measured at admission, and coronary artery disease severity was evaluated using the SYNTAX score. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. Secondary endpoints encompassed individual MACE components and heart failure hospitalisations.
Results: The mean age was 54.93 years (83% male). SIIRI levels were significantly higher in STEMI patients (6.83 ± 6.43 × 105) compared to NSTEMI (4.5 ± 5.39 × 105) and unstable angina (3.48 ± 2.83 × 105) (P < 0.001). Area under the curve for SIIRI distinguished NSTEMI and unstable angina from STEMI (0.81 and 0.80), with optimal cut-off points of 4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105. In NSTEMI, 24.6% presented within 2 h of symptom onset, were troponin-negative, yet had elevated SIIRI. Post-PCI, SIIRI > 4.93 × 105 correlated with increased MACE at 1 year (17.2% vs 5%).
Conclusion: NSTEMI and unstable angina patients with SIIRI values >4.80 × 105 and 4.25 × 105 respectively, may require urgent intervention (<2 h). SIIRI can be of significant utility in patients of NSTEMI who present earlier with negative troponins. SIIRI can also aid in identifying high-risk individuals post-PCI, providing a valuable tool for early and accurate assessment.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.