嗜碱性粒细胞活化测试对鼻炎过敏表型诊断准确性的研究。

IF 12.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Allergy Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1111/all.16390
Almudena Testera-Montes, Adriana Ariza, Rosa Alba Sola-Martinez, Carlos Jose Aranda, Guillermo Bentabol-Ramos, Dulce Sanchez-Torralvo, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Carmen Rondon
{"title":"嗜碱性粒细胞活化测试对鼻炎过敏表型诊断准确性的研究。","authors":"Almudena Testera-Montes, Adriana Ariza, Rosa Alba Sola-Martinez, Carlos Jose Aranda, Guillermo Bentabol-Ramos, Dulce Sanchez-Torralvo, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Carmen Rondon","doi":"10.1111/all.16390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Basophil activation test (BAT) might be an alternative to nasal allergen challenge (NAC) to identify the allergic etiology in rhinitis patients. Here, we investigate the diagnostic performance of BAT for allergic phenotypes of rhinitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rhinitis patients and healthy controls were subjected to NAC with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Alternaria alternata (AA), grass (GP) and olive (OP) pollens. Rhinitis subjects also underwent skin prick test (SPT) with relevant allergens. Patients were classified into allergic rhinitis (AR, positive NAC and SPT), local allergic rhinitis (LAR, positive NAC and negative SPT), dual allergic rhinitis (DAR, defined as AR for ≥1 allergen and LAR for ≥1 allergen), and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR, negative NAC and SPT) phenotypes. BAT with DP, AA, GP and OP was conducted in study individuals and compared with NAC results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 AR, 31 DAR, 26 LAR, 12 NAR and 21 control subjects were recruited. The best positivity cut-offs of BAT for DP-, AA-, GP- and OP-driven allergy (all phenotypes) were a %CD63 cells of 8.650, 14.250, 26.200, and 12.780, respectively (AUC 0.851, 0.701, 0.887, and 0.921, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of BAT (all phenotypes) ranged 43.5%(AA)-83.3%(OP), 88.9%(GP)-100%(AA), 87%(GP)-100%(AA), and 61.1%(DP)-80.0%(pollens), respectively. BAT identified 79%-100% of SPT-positive allergies (AR and DAR), and 25%-75% of SPT-negative allergies (LAR and DAR), while ≤10% of NAR/HC subjects tested positive. BAT positivity correlated with rhinitis severity in LAR patients (p = 0.018), and associated with conjunctivitis (p = 0.015) in allergic subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAT can replace NAC for AR confirmation, and limit the number of NAC required for LAR and DAR diagnosis. BAT can demonstrate sIgE in SPT-negative allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the diagnostic accuracy of basophil activation test for allergic phenotypes of rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Almudena Testera-Montes, Adriana Ariza, Rosa Alba Sola-Martinez, Carlos Jose Aranda, Guillermo Bentabol-Ramos, Dulce Sanchez-Torralvo, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Carmen Rondon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/all.16390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Basophil activation test (BAT) might be an alternative to nasal allergen challenge (NAC) to identify the allergic etiology in rhinitis patients. Here, we investigate the diagnostic performance of BAT for allergic phenotypes of rhinitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rhinitis patients and healthy controls were subjected to NAC with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Alternaria alternata (AA), grass (GP) and olive (OP) pollens. Rhinitis subjects also underwent skin prick test (SPT) with relevant allergens. Patients were classified into allergic rhinitis (AR, positive NAC and SPT), local allergic rhinitis (LAR, positive NAC and negative SPT), dual allergic rhinitis (DAR, defined as AR for ≥1 allergen and LAR for ≥1 allergen), and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR, negative NAC and SPT) phenotypes. BAT with DP, AA, GP and OP was conducted in study individuals and compared with NAC results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 AR, 31 DAR, 26 LAR, 12 NAR and 21 control subjects were recruited. The best positivity cut-offs of BAT for DP-, AA-, GP- and OP-driven allergy (all phenotypes) were a %CD63 cells of 8.650, 14.250, 26.200, and 12.780, respectively (AUC 0.851, 0.701, 0.887, and 0.921, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of BAT (all phenotypes) ranged 43.5%(AA)-83.3%(OP), 88.9%(GP)-100%(AA), 87%(GP)-100%(AA), and 61.1%(DP)-80.0%(pollens), respectively. BAT identified 79%-100% of SPT-positive allergies (AR and DAR), and 25%-75% of SPT-negative allergies (LAR and DAR), while ≤10% of NAR/HC subjects tested positive. BAT positivity correlated with rhinitis severity in LAR patients (p = 0.018), and associated with conjunctivitis (p = 0.015) in allergic subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAT can replace NAC for AR confirmation, and limit the number of NAC required for LAR and DAR diagnosis. BAT can demonstrate sIgE in SPT-negative allergies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/all.16390\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/all.16390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)可替代鼻过敏原挑战试验(NAC)来确定鼻炎患者的过敏病因。在此,我们研究了 BAT 对鼻炎过敏表型的诊断性能:方法:对鼻炎患者和健康对照组进行鼻腔过敏原检测,检测对象包括Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP)、Alternaria alternata (AA)、草花粉 (GP) 和橄榄花粉 (OP)。鼻炎受试者还接受了相关过敏原的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。患者被分为过敏性鼻炎(AR,NAC 和 SPT 阳性)、局部过敏性鼻炎(LAR,NAC 阳性,SPT 阴性)、双重过敏性鼻炎(DAR,定义为≥1 种过敏原的 AR 和≥1 种过敏原的 LAR)和非过敏性鼻炎(NAR,NAC 和 SPT 阴性)表型。对研究个体进行了含有 DP、AA、GP 和 OP 的 BAT 检测,并与 NAC 结果进行了比较:结果:共招募了 47 名 AR 受试者、31 名 DAR 受试者、26 名 LAR 受试者、12 名 NAR 受试者和 21 名对照组受试者。BAT对DP、AA、GP和OP过敏(所有表型)的最佳阳性临界值分别为%CD63细胞8.650、14.250、26.200和12.780(AUC分别为0.851、0.701、0.887和0.921)。BAT 的灵敏度、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值(所有表型)分别为 43.5%(AA)-83.3%(OP)、88.9%(GP)-100%(AA)、87%(GP)-100%(AA)和 61.1%(DP)-80.0%(花粉)。BAT 鉴定出 79%-100% 的 SPT 阳性过敏(AR 和 DAR)和 25%-75% 的 SPT 阴性过敏(LAR 和 DAR),而 NAR/HC 受试者中检测呈阳性的比例≤10%。BAT 阳性与 LAR 患者的鼻炎严重程度相关(p = 0.018),与过敏性受试者的结膜炎相关(p = 0.015):结论:BAT 可替代 NAC 用于 AR 确认,并限制 LAR 和 DAR 诊断所需的 NAC 数量。BAT 可在 SPT 阴性的过敏症中显示 sIgE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of the diagnostic accuracy of basophil activation test for allergic phenotypes of rhinitis.

Introduction: Basophil activation test (BAT) might be an alternative to nasal allergen challenge (NAC) to identify the allergic etiology in rhinitis patients. Here, we investigate the diagnostic performance of BAT for allergic phenotypes of rhinitis.

Methods: Rhinitis patients and healthy controls were subjected to NAC with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Alternaria alternata (AA), grass (GP) and olive (OP) pollens. Rhinitis subjects also underwent skin prick test (SPT) with relevant allergens. Patients were classified into allergic rhinitis (AR, positive NAC and SPT), local allergic rhinitis (LAR, positive NAC and negative SPT), dual allergic rhinitis (DAR, defined as AR for ≥1 allergen and LAR for ≥1 allergen), and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR, negative NAC and SPT) phenotypes. BAT with DP, AA, GP and OP was conducted in study individuals and compared with NAC results.

Results: A total of 47 AR, 31 DAR, 26 LAR, 12 NAR and 21 control subjects were recruited. The best positivity cut-offs of BAT for DP-, AA-, GP- and OP-driven allergy (all phenotypes) were a %CD63 cells of 8.650, 14.250, 26.200, and 12.780, respectively (AUC 0.851, 0.701, 0.887, and 0.921, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of BAT (all phenotypes) ranged 43.5%(AA)-83.3%(OP), 88.9%(GP)-100%(AA), 87%(GP)-100%(AA), and 61.1%(DP)-80.0%(pollens), respectively. BAT identified 79%-100% of SPT-positive allergies (AR and DAR), and 25%-75% of SPT-negative allergies (LAR and DAR), while ≤10% of NAR/HC subjects tested positive. BAT positivity correlated with rhinitis severity in LAR patients (p = 0.018), and associated with conjunctivitis (p = 0.015) in allergic subjects.

Conclusion: BAT can replace NAC for AR confirmation, and limit the number of NAC required for LAR and DAR diagnosis. BAT can demonstrate sIgE in SPT-negative allergies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信