在环境胁迫下,嫩枝促进作用比根系促进作用对植物大小不均的影响更大:双层影响区模型的理论启示

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xin Jia, Wei-Ping Zhang
{"title":"在环境胁迫下,嫩枝促进作用比根系促进作用对植物大小不均的影响更大:双层影响区模型的理论启示","authors":"Xin Jia, Wei-Ping Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot <i>vs</i>. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shoot facilitation contributes more than root facilitation to plant size inequality under environmental stress: theoretical insights from a two-layer zone-of-influence model\",\"authors\":\"Xin Jia, Wei-Ping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot <i>vs</i>. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的植物与植物之间的良性互动(即促进作用)通常发生在压力环境下,并调节种群和群落动态。方法我们使用了一个双层 "影响区 "模型来探讨竞争性大小不对称和促进作用对压力梯度上大小不平等的影响。结果压力水平本身(没有植物-植物相互作用)对大小不平等的影响很小。当不存在促进作用时,嫩枝、根和嫩枝+根的竞争强度一般会随着胁迫的增加而降低。因此,大多数相互作用情况下的大小不均随压力的增加而减小。与完全对称的根竞争相比,非对称芽竞争(最大个体获得所有竞争资源)下的体型不平等程度更高。当存在芽或根的促进作用时,在高胁迫水平下,芽或根相互作用的相应净效应为正。在这些相互作用情况下,促进作用会导致更大的大小不平等,因为较大的植株往往与邻近植株重叠更多,从而从邻近植株中获益更多。此外,嫩枝促进作用下的株型不平等程度大于根系促进作用下的株型不平等程度,这可能是因为前者通常是株型不对称的(即较大的嫩枝从重叠区域获得不成比例的更多益处),而后者更可能是对称的。恶劣环境下的农业和森林管理可能会试图操纵地上植物与植物之间的相互作用,以实现预期的生产目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Shoot facilitation contributes more than root facilitation to plant size inequality under environmental stress: theoretical insights from a two-layer zone-of-influence model

Shoot facilitation contributes more than root facilitation to plant size inequality under environmental stress: theoretical insights from a two-layer zone-of-influence model

Background and aims

Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot vs. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.

Methods

We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.

Results

Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.

Conclusion

Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信