{"title":"在环境胁迫下,嫩枝促进作用比根系促进作用对植物大小不均的影响更大:双层影响区模型的理论启示","authors":"Xin Jia, Wei-Ping Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot <i>vs</i>. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shoot facilitation contributes more than root facilitation to plant size inequality under environmental stress: theoretical insights from a two-layer zone-of-influence model\",\"authors\":\"Xin Jia, Wei-Ping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot <i>vs</i>. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07056-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shoot facilitation contributes more than root facilitation to plant size inequality under environmental stress: theoretical insights from a two-layer zone-of-influence model
Background and aims
Positive plant-plant interactions (i.e. facilitation) often occur under stressful environments and regulate population and community dynamics. However, the relative importance of shoot vs. root facilitation in determining plant size inequality (coefficient of variation for biomass among individuals) remains poorly understood.
Methods
We used a two-layer “zone-of-influence” model to explore the effects of competitive size-asymmetry and facilitation on size inequality along stress gradients.
Results
Stress level alone (without plant-plant interactions) had little influence on size inequality. When facilitation was not present, shoot, root, and shoot + root competition intensity generally decreased with increasing stress. Accordingly, size inequality under most interaction scenarios decreased with increasing stress. Size inequality was higher under asymmetric shoot competition (the largest individual obtains all the contested resources) than under completely-symmetric root competition. When either shoot or root facilitation was present, corresponding net effects of shoot or root interactions were positive at high stress levels. Facilitation led to larger size inequality under these interaction scenarios because larger plants tend to overlap more with and thus benefit more from neighbors. Furthermore, size inequality with shoot facilitation was greater than that with root facilitation, possibly because the former is generally size-asymmetric (i.e. larger shoots obtain disproportionately more benefits from overlapping areas), while the latter is more likely to be symmetric.
Conclusion
Our results highlight the role of shoot facilitation in amplifying plant size inequality. Agricultural and forest management in harsh environments may attempt to manipulate aboveground plant-plant interactions to achieve desired production goals.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.