评估对流层湍流对印度次大陆 VGOS 望远镜位置的影响,以估算地球方位参数

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Arnab Laha, Johannes Böhm, Sigrid Böhm, Matthias Schartner, Hana Krásná, Nagarajan Balasubramanian, Onkar Dikshit
{"title":"评估对流层湍流对印度次大陆 VGOS 望远镜位置的影响,以估算地球方位参数","authors":"Arnab Laha, Johannes Böhm, Sigrid Böhm, Matthias Schartner, Hana Krásná, Nagarajan Balasubramanian, Onkar Dikshit","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01912-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The complete set of five Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) can only be estimated accurately using geodetic Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI). Their precision and accuracy depends on network geometry and station-dependent properties. Atmospheric turbulence poses one of the largest error sources for geodetic VLBI, impacting the precision of EOP. Thus, it becomes imperative to consider this factor while choosing the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI. The magnitude of tropospheric turbulence is approximated through the refractive index structure constant, <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}^\\textrm{2}\\)</span>. In this study, we simulate the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI in India, considering individual tropospheric turbulence parameters per telescope location. The study identifies 14 potential VLBI stations, co-located with GPS stations and homogeneously distributed all over India, and computes the <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}\\)</span> values from zenith wet delay variances over 24 h obtained from GPS data. These locations are simulated in addition to three different reference networks, which show the current and future VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) networks. Multiple schedules have been generated and simulated for each configuration using VieSched++, and the precision of EOP is compared when constant and station-specific tropospheric turbulence parameters are used. The study shows that, for the investigated networks, southern stations are optimal for polar motion and celestial pole offsets estimation, whereas an eastern station is optimal for UT1−UTC estimation. Furthermore, the study highlights that for reference networks with fewer stations, utilizing station-specific <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}\\)</span> values significantly influences the determination of optimal locations. It further demonstrates how station-specific <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}\\)</span> values impact the positioning of VGOS telescopes in each network for each EOP differently. The findings show that higher <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}\\)</span> values generally lead to a degradation in EOP precision. Geometrically, a station might be at a good location, but if the <span>\\(C_\\textrm{n}\\)</span> value is too high, that location is not favorable.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing tropospheric turbulence impact on VGOS telescope placement in the Indian subcontinent for the estimation of earth orientation parameters\",\"authors\":\"Arnab Laha, Johannes Böhm, Sigrid Böhm, Matthias Schartner, Hana Krásná, Nagarajan Balasubramanian, Onkar Dikshit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01912-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The complete set of five Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) can only be estimated accurately using geodetic Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI). Their precision and accuracy depends on network geometry and station-dependent properties. Atmospheric turbulence poses one of the largest error sources for geodetic VLBI, impacting the precision of EOP. Thus, it becomes imperative to consider this factor while choosing the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI. The magnitude of tropospheric turbulence is approximated through the refractive index structure constant, <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}^\\\\textrm{2}\\\\)</span>. In this study, we simulate the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI in India, considering individual tropospheric turbulence parameters per telescope location. The study identifies 14 potential VLBI stations, co-located with GPS stations and homogeneously distributed all over India, and computes the <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}\\\\)</span> values from zenith wet delay variances over 24 h obtained from GPS data. These locations are simulated in addition to three different reference networks, which show the current and future VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) networks. Multiple schedules have been generated and simulated for each configuration using VieSched++, and the precision of EOP is compared when constant and station-specific tropospheric turbulence parameters are used. The study shows that, for the investigated networks, southern stations are optimal for polar motion and celestial pole offsets estimation, whereas an eastern station is optimal for UT1−UTC estimation. Furthermore, the study highlights that for reference networks with fewer stations, utilizing station-specific <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}\\\\)</span> values significantly influences the determination of optimal locations. It further demonstrates how station-specific <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}\\\\)</span> values impact the positioning of VGOS telescopes in each network for each EOP differently. The findings show that higher <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}\\\\)</span> values generally lead to a degradation in EOP precision. Geometrically, a station might be at a good location, but if the <span>\\\\(C_\\\\textrm{n}\\\\)</span> value is too high, that location is not favorable.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01912-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01912-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只有使用大地测量甚长基线干涉测量法(VLBI)才能准确估算出完整的五个地球方位参数(EOP)。它们的精度和准确性取决于网络的几何形状和台站特性。大气湍流是大地测量甚长基线干涉测量法的最大误差源之一,会影响 EOP 的精度。因此,在选择大地测量 VLBI 的最佳位置时必须考虑这一因素。对流层湍流的大小是通过折射率结构常数(C_\textrm{n}^\textrm{2}\)近似得到的。在本研究中,我们模拟了印度大地测量 VLBI 的最佳位置,考虑了每个望远镜位置的对流层湍流参数。这项研究确定了 14 个潜在的 VLBI 台站,这些台站与全球定位系统台站同处一地,均匀地分布在印度各地,并根据从全球定位系统数据中获得的 24 小时天顶湿延迟方差计算出 \(C_\textrm{n}\)值。除了模拟这些地点外,还模拟了三个不同的参考网络,它们显示了当前和未来的 VLBI 全球观测系统(VGOS)网络。使用 VieSched++ 为每种配置生成和模拟了多个时间表,并比较了使用恒定对流层湍流参数和特定站点对流层湍流参数时 EOP 的精度。研究表明,在所调查的网络中,南部台站是极地运动和天极偏移估计的最佳选择,而东部台站则是UT1-UTC估计的最佳选择。此外,研究还强调,对于台站较少的参考网,利用特定台站的 \(C_\textrm{n}\)值会显著影响最佳位置的确定。研究还进一步证明了台站特定的(C_textrm{n})值如何对每个网络中每个 EOP 的 VGOS 望远镜的定位产生不同的影响。研究结果表明,较高的\(C_\textrm{n}\)值通常会导致EOP精度下降。从几何学角度看,一个台站可能位于一个很好的位置,但如果\(C_\textrm{n}\)值过高,这个位置就不合适了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing tropospheric turbulence impact on VGOS telescope placement in the Indian subcontinent for the estimation of earth orientation parameters

Assessing tropospheric turbulence impact on VGOS telescope placement in the Indian subcontinent for the estimation of earth orientation parameters

The complete set of five Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) can only be estimated accurately using geodetic Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI). Their precision and accuracy depends on network geometry and station-dependent properties. Atmospheric turbulence poses one of the largest error sources for geodetic VLBI, impacting the precision of EOP. Thus, it becomes imperative to consider this factor while choosing the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI. The magnitude of tropospheric turbulence is approximated through the refractive index structure constant, \(C_\textrm{n}^\textrm{2}\). In this study, we simulate the optimal locations for geodetic VLBI in India, considering individual tropospheric turbulence parameters per telescope location. The study identifies 14 potential VLBI stations, co-located with GPS stations and homogeneously distributed all over India, and computes the \(C_\textrm{n}\) values from zenith wet delay variances over 24 h obtained from GPS data. These locations are simulated in addition to three different reference networks, which show the current and future VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) networks. Multiple schedules have been generated and simulated for each configuration using VieSched++, and the precision of EOP is compared when constant and station-specific tropospheric turbulence parameters are used. The study shows that, for the investigated networks, southern stations are optimal for polar motion and celestial pole offsets estimation, whereas an eastern station is optimal for UT1−UTC estimation. Furthermore, the study highlights that for reference networks with fewer stations, utilizing station-specific \(C_\textrm{n}\) values significantly influences the determination of optimal locations. It further demonstrates how station-specific \(C_\textrm{n}\) values impact the positioning of VGOS telescopes in each network for each EOP differently. The findings show that higher \(C_\textrm{n}\) values generally lead to a degradation in EOP precision. Geometrically, a station might be at a good location, but if the \(C_\textrm{n}\) value is too high, that location is not favorable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信