对一所 EMI 大学使用英语作为学术通用语的学术讲座中模糊表达的评价分析

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xiaoling Jin
{"title":"对一所 EMI 大学使用英语作为学术通用语的学术讲座中模糊表达的评价分析","authors":"Xiaoling Jin","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to compare how lecturers, also being different English as a lingua franca (ELF) users use various vague expressions in academic lectures in a Chinese English-medium instruction (EMI) university. The study adopts the framework of <span>appraisal</span> grounded in systemic functional linguistic theory to classify all vague expressions according to intensity, amount, and categorisation. It is found that vagueness in relation to amount with no gradable features was used most frequently in the 12 academic lectures of the study, followed by those related to no-scaled categorisation and upscaled intensity. The use of vague expressions is further examined from an academic ELF perspective. We discover that native-speaker lecturers may use more vague expressions concerning amount whereas ELF lecturers may prefer those concerning intensity. Finally, we suggest some pedagogical implications of using vagueness in ELF communication for delivering academic lectures in the EMI university context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"34 4","pages":"1462-1478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraisal analysis of the vague expressions in academic lectures using English as an academic lingua franca in an EMI university\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoling Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijal.12579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aims to compare how lecturers, also being different English as a lingua franca (ELF) users use various vague expressions in academic lectures in a Chinese English-medium instruction (EMI) university. The study adopts the framework of <span>appraisal</span> grounded in systemic functional linguistic theory to classify all vague expressions according to intensity, amount, and categorisation. It is found that vagueness in relation to amount with no gradable features was used most frequently in the 12 academic lectures of the study, followed by those related to no-scaled categorisation and upscaled intensity. The use of vague expressions is further examined from an academic ELF perspective. We discover that native-speaker lecturers may use more vague expressions concerning amount whereas ELF lecturers may prefer those concerning intensity. Finally, we suggest some pedagogical implications of using vagueness in ELF communication for delivering academic lectures in the EMI university context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"1462-1478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12579\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较在一所中国英语教学(EMI)大学中,同样是英语作为通用语言(ELF)使用者的讲师如何在学术讲座中使用各种模糊表达。研究采用以系统功能语言学理论为基础的评估框架,根据强度、数量和分类对所有模糊表达进行分类。研究发现,在本研究的 12 个学术讲座中,与无等级特征的数量有关的模糊表达使用频率最高,其次是与无等级分类和有等级强度有关的模糊表达。我们从学术英语语言的角度进一步研究了模糊表达的使用情况。我们发现,母语为英语的讲师可能会更多地使用与 "量 "有关的模糊表达,而英语语言学讲师则更喜欢使用与 "强度 "有关的模糊表达。最后,我们提出了在英语语言交流中使用模糊表达对在 EMI 大学环境中进行学术讲座的一些教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appraisal analysis of the vague expressions in academic lectures using English as an academic lingua franca in an EMI university

This study aims to compare how lecturers, also being different English as a lingua franca (ELF) users use various vague expressions in academic lectures in a Chinese English-medium instruction (EMI) university. The study adopts the framework of appraisal grounded in systemic functional linguistic theory to classify all vague expressions according to intensity, amount, and categorisation. It is found that vagueness in relation to amount with no gradable features was used most frequently in the 12 academic lectures of the study, followed by those related to no-scaled categorisation and upscaled intensity. The use of vague expressions is further examined from an academic ELF perspective. We discover that native-speaker lecturers may use more vague expressions concerning amount whereas ELF lecturers may prefer those concerning intensity. Finally, we suggest some pedagogical implications of using vagueness in ELF communication for delivering academic lectures in the EMI university context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信