Raquel Gasque-Rubio, Laura Cubas-Nuñez, Jordi Tortosa-Carreres, Lorena Forés-Toribio, Jéssica Castillo-Villalba, Sara Carratalá-Boscá, Carmen Alcalá-Vicente, Carlos Quintanilla-Bordás, David Gorriz, Francisco Gascón-Gimenez, Guillermo Cervera-Ygual, José Andrés Dominguez-Morán, María Carcelén-Gadea, Begoña Laiz Marro, Bonaventura Casanova, Francisco Pérez-Miralles
{"title":"Simoa 和 Lumipulse 在测量多发性硬化症患者血清神经丝轻链方面的比较评估","authors":"Raquel Gasque-Rubio, Laura Cubas-Nuñez, Jordi Tortosa-Carreres, Lorena Forés-Toribio, Jéssica Castillo-Villalba, Sara Carratalá-Boscá, Carmen Alcalá-Vicente, Carlos Quintanilla-Bordás, David Gorriz, Francisco Gascón-Gimenez, Guillermo Cervera-Ygual, José Andrés Dominguez-Morán, María Carcelén-Gadea, Begoña Laiz Marro, Bonaventura Casanova, Francisco Pérez-Miralles","doi":"10.1155/2024/1950913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background</b>: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is increasingly significant in the field of neurology. In multiple sclerosis (MS), it proves valuable as a marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response.</p><p><b>Objective</b>: To compare the Simoa and Lumipulse platforms for measuring sNfL and to establish age-specific reference ranges within a substantial cohort of individuals diagnosed with MS.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two hundred sixty-one sNfL measurements from a cohort of 229 MS patients were analyzed with Simoa and Lumipulse. Reference ranges for sNfL were established for three age groups (18–39 years, 40–59 years, and > 60 years) selecting data from 166 patients with stable relapsing–remitting MS.</p><p><b>Results:</b> While sNfL levels correlated between assays, Lumipulse exhibited values higher than Simoa. Passing–Bablok’s analysis confirmed linearity between the two datasets, and the Bland–Altman comparison further supported the agreement between the methods. Analyzing reference ranges for sNfL across three age groups in stable RRMS patients revealed significant differences between the groups on each of the platforms. Although the values followed the same trend, each technology utilized distinct reference ranges.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Simoa and Lumipulse platforms proved equally effective in monitoring patients with MS. The enhanced accessibility of the Lumipulse platform facilitates the expansion of research on sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS, thus offering promising opportunities for broader accessibility and advancement in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1950913","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of Simoa and Lumipulse for Measuring Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Multiple Sclerosis Patients\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Gasque-Rubio, Laura Cubas-Nuñez, Jordi Tortosa-Carreres, Lorena Forés-Toribio, Jéssica Castillo-Villalba, Sara Carratalá-Boscá, Carmen Alcalá-Vicente, Carlos Quintanilla-Bordás, David Gorriz, Francisco Gascón-Gimenez, Guillermo Cervera-Ygual, José Andrés Dominguez-Morán, María Carcelén-Gadea, Begoña Laiz Marro, Bonaventura Casanova, Francisco Pérez-Miralles\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1950913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background</b>: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is increasingly significant in the field of neurology. In multiple sclerosis (MS), it proves valuable as a marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response.</p><p><b>Objective</b>: To compare the Simoa and Lumipulse platforms for measuring sNfL and to establish age-specific reference ranges within a substantial cohort of individuals diagnosed with MS.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two hundred sixty-one sNfL measurements from a cohort of 229 MS patients were analyzed with Simoa and Lumipulse. Reference ranges for sNfL were established for three age groups (18–39 years, 40–59 years, and > 60 years) selecting data from 166 patients with stable relapsing–remitting MS.</p><p><b>Results:</b> While sNfL levels correlated between assays, Lumipulse exhibited values higher than Simoa. Passing–Bablok’s analysis confirmed linearity between the two datasets, and the Bland–Altman comparison further supported the agreement between the methods. Analyzing reference ranges for sNfL across three age groups in stable RRMS patients revealed significant differences between the groups on each of the platforms. Although the values followed the same trend, each technology utilized distinct reference ranges.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Simoa and Lumipulse platforms proved equally effective in monitoring patients with MS. The enhanced accessibility of the Lumipulse platform facilitates the expansion of research on sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS, thus offering promising opportunities for broader accessibility and advancement in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1950913\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1950913\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1950913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Assessment of Simoa and Lumipulse for Measuring Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Background: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is increasingly significant in the field of neurology. In multiple sclerosis (MS), it proves valuable as a marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response.
Objective: To compare the Simoa and Lumipulse platforms for measuring sNfL and to establish age-specific reference ranges within a substantial cohort of individuals diagnosed with MS.
Methods: Two hundred sixty-one sNfL measurements from a cohort of 229 MS patients were analyzed with Simoa and Lumipulse. Reference ranges for sNfL were established for three age groups (18–39 years, 40–59 years, and > 60 years) selecting data from 166 patients with stable relapsing–remitting MS.
Results: While sNfL levels correlated between assays, Lumipulse exhibited values higher than Simoa. Passing–Bablok’s analysis confirmed linearity between the two datasets, and the Bland–Altman comparison further supported the agreement between the methods. Analyzing reference ranges for sNfL across three age groups in stable RRMS patients revealed significant differences between the groups on each of the platforms. Although the values followed the same trend, each technology utilized distinct reference ranges.
Conclusion: Simoa and Lumipulse platforms proved equally effective in monitoring patients with MS. The enhanced accessibility of the Lumipulse platform facilitates the expansion of research on sNfL as a biomarker for monitoring MS, thus offering promising opportunities for broader accessibility and advancement in this field.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.