替代性森林生物质利用产生的气溶胶排放的置换系数

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Aapo Tikka, Anni Hartikainen, Olli Sippula, Antti Kilpeläinen
{"title":"替代性森林生物质利用产生的气溶胶排放的置换系数","authors":"Aapo Tikka,&nbsp;Anni Hartikainen,&nbsp;Olli Sippula,&nbsp;Antti Kilpeläinen","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substituting alternative materials and energy sources with forest biomass can cause significant environmental consequences, such as alteration in the released emissions which can be described by displacement factors (DFs). Until now, DFs of wood-based materials have included greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and have been associated with lower fossil and process-based emissions than non-wood counterparts. In addition to GHGs, aerosols released in combustion processes, for example, alter radiative forcing in the atmosphere and consequently have an influence on climate. In this study, the objective was to quantify the changes in the most important aerosol emission components for cases when wood-based materials and energy were used to replace the production of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic, common fossil-based construction materials (concrete, steel and brick), non-wood textile materials and energy produced by fossil fuels and peat. For this reason, we expanded the DF calculations to include aerosol emissions of total suspended particles (TSP), respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine particles (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>), sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) based on the embodied energies of materials and energy sources. The DFs for cardboard implied a decrease in BC, SO<sub>2</sub> and NMVOC emissions but an increase in the other emission components. DFs for sawn wood mainly indicated higher emissions of both particles and gaseous emissions compared to non-wood counterparts. DFs for wood-based textiles demonstrated increased particle emissions and reduced gaseous emissions. DFs for energy biomass mainly implied an increase in emissions, especially if biomass was combusted in small-scale appliances. Our main conclusion highlights the critical need to thoroughly assess how using forest biomass affects aerosol emissions. This improved understanding of the aerosol emissions of the forestry sector is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the climate and health implications associated with forest biomass use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Displacement Factors for Aerosol Emissions From Alternative Forest Biomass Use\",\"authors\":\"Aapo Tikka,&nbsp;Anni Hartikainen,&nbsp;Olli Sippula,&nbsp;Antti Kilpeläinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Substituting alternative materials and energy sources with forest biomass can cause significant environmental consequences, such as alteration in the released emissions which can be described by displacement factors (DFs). Until now, DFs of wood-based materials have included greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and have been associated with lower fossil and process-based emissions than non-wood counterparts. In addition to GHGs, aerosols released in combustion processes, for example, alter radiative forcing in the atmosphere and consequently have an influence on climate. In this study, the objective was to quantify the changes in the most important aerosol emission components for cases when wood-based materials and energy were used to replace the production of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic, common fossil-based construction materials (concrete, steel and brick), non-wood textile materials and energy produced by fossil fuels and peat. For this reason, we expanded the DF calculations to include aerosol emissions of total suspended particles (TSP), respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine particles (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>), sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) based on the embodied energies of materials and energy sources. The DFs for cardboard implied a decrease in BC, SO<sub>2</sub> and NMVOC emissions but an increase in the other emission components. DFs for sawn wood mainly indicated higher emissions of both particles and gaseous emissions compared to non-wood counterparts. DFs for wood-based textiles demonstrated increased particle emissions and reduced gaseous emissions. DFs for energy biomass mainly implied an increase in emissions, especially if biomass was combusted in small-scale appliances. Our main conclusion highlights the critical need to thoroughly assess how using forest biomass affects aerosol emissions. This improved understanding of the aerosol emissions of the forestry sector is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the climate and health implications associated with forest biomass use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用森林生物质替代其他材料和能源会对环境造成重大影响,如改变排放物的释放量,这可以用置换系数(DFs)来描述。到目前为止,木质材料的 DFs 包括温室气体(GHG)排放,与非木质材料相比,木质材料的化石和加工排放较低。除温室气体外,燃烧过程中释放的气溶胶等也会改变大气中的辐射强迫,从而对气候产生影响。在这项研究中,我们的目标是量化在使用木质材料和能源替代高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)塑料、常见化石建筑材料(混凝土、钢材和砖)、非木材纺织材料以及化石燃料和泥炭能源生产的情况下,最重要的气溶胶排放成分的变化。因此,我们根据材料和能源的内含能量,将 DF 计算扩展到包括总悬浮颗粒物 (TSP)、可吸入颗粒物 (PM10)、细颗粒物 (PM2.5)、黑碳 (BC)、氮氧化物 (NOx)、二氧化硫 (SO2) 和非甲烷挥发性有机化合物 (NMVOC) 等气溶胶排放。纸板的 DFs 意味着 BC、SO2 和 NMVOC 排放量的减少,但其他排放成分的增加。锯木的 DFs 主要表明颗粒物和气体排放量均高于非木材。木质纺织品的 DFs 表明颗粒排放增加,气体排放减少。能源生物质的 DFs 主要意味着排放量的增加,尤其是在小型设备中燃烧生物质的情况下。我们的主要结论强调了彻底评估使用森林生物质如何影响气溶胶排放的迫切需要。加深对林业气溶胶排放的了解,对于全面评估森林生物质利用对气候和健康的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Displacement Factors for Aerosol Emissions From Alternative Forest Biomass Use

Displacement Factors for Aerosol Emissions From Alternative Forest Biomass Use

Substituting alternative materials and energy sources with forest biomass can cause significant environmental consequences, such as alteration in the released emissions which can be described by displacement factors (DFs). Until now, DFs of wood-based materials have included greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and have been associated with lower fossil and process-based emissions than non-wood counterparts. In addition to GHGs, aerosols released in combustion processes, for example, alter radiative forcing in the atmosphere and consequently have an influence on climate. In this study, the objective was to quantify the changes in the most important aerosol emission components for cases when wood-based materials and energy were used to replace the production of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic, common fossil-based construction materials (concrete, steel and brick), non-wood textile materials and energy produced by fossil fuels and peat. For this reason, we expanded the DF calculations to include aerosol emissions of total suspended particles (TSP), respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine particles (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) based on the embodied energies of materials and energy sources. The DFs for cardboard implied a decrease in BC, SO2 and NMVOC emissions but an increase in the other emission components. DFs for sawn wood mainly indicated higher emissions of both particles and gaseous emissions compared to non-wood counterparts. DFs for wood-based textiles demonstrated increased particle emissions and reduced gaseous emissions. DFs for energy biomass mainly implied an increase in emissions, especially if biomass was combusted in small-scale appliances. Our main conclusion highlights the critical need to thoroughly assess how using forest biomass affects aerosol emissions. This improved understanding of the aerosol emissions of the forestry sector is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the climate and health implications associated with forest biomass use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信