{"title":"二氧化碳衍生燃料生产催化剂设计的可持续性评估","authors":"Jalil Shadbahr , Craig A. Peeples , Ergys Pahija , Christopher Panaritis , Daria Camilla Boffito , Gregory Patience , Farid Bensebaa","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Levelized carbon cost abatement (LCCA) and technology learning curves (TLC) are combined to assess the current technology gaps for expediting the deployment of CO<sub>2</sub>-based renewable fuels. This study is conducted across three levels: Assessing the impact of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) catalyst improvement on products, estimating the potential reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and calculating the cost reduction per unit of avoided CO2 emissions. A novel hybrid approach combines bottom-up TEA and LCA tools to assess FTS catalysts, while top-down TLC methodology evaluates future projections of the CO<sub>2</sub> to jet fuel (CtJ) platform. The evaluation and comparison of the newly designed FTS catalyst (CYL) and a conventional catalyst (COC) on the CtJ platform are conducted within this scope. Replacing COC with CYL leads to an increase of >170 % in catalyst cost. However, despite the increase in catalyst cost, the overall fuel production of the CtJ platform is boosted by 16 %, and the energy efficiency is improved by +13 %. Consequently, the CYL catalyst enables the production of jet fuel and diesel at a lower cost (−15 % to −17 %) compared to COC from 2027 to 2050. Furthermore, for both cases' equal net CO<sub>2</sub> capture, CYL requires 15 % lower CO<sub>2</sub> capture and thus 41 % lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the CtJ platform than COC. LCCA of CO<sub>2</sub>-derived fuels is projected to be very close to the $170/tonne CO<sub>2</sub> carbon tax target in 2030. Thus, CO<sub>2</sub>-derived jet fuels are expected to compete with fossil fuels in the Canadian market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability assessment of catalyst design on CO2-derived fuel production\",\"authors\":\"Jalil Shadbahr , Craig A. Peeples , Ergys Pahija , Christopher Panaritis , Daria Camilla Boffito , Gregory Patience , Farid Bensebaa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Levelized carbon cost abatement (LCCA) and technology learning curves (TLC) are combined to assess the current technology gaps for expediting the deployment of CO<sub>2</sub>-based renewable fuels. This study is conducted across three levels: Assessing the impact of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) catalyst improvement on products, estimating the potential reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and calculating the cost reduction per unit of avoided CO2 emissions. A novel hybrid approach combines bottom-up TEA and LCA tools to assess FTS catalysts, while top-down TLC methodology evaluates future projections of the CO<sub>2</sub> to jet fuel (CtJ) platform. The evaluation and comparison of the newly designed FTS catalyst (CYL) and a conventional catalyst (COC) on the CtJ platform are conducted within this scope. Replacing COC with CYL leads to an increase of >170 % in catalyst cost. However, despite the increase in catalyst cost, the overall fuel production of the CtJ platform is boosted by 16 %, and the energy efficiency is improved by +13 %. Consequently, the CYL catalyst enables the production of jet fuel and diesel at a lower cost (−15 % to −17 %) compared to COC from 2027 to 2050. Furthermore, for both cases' equal net CO<sub>2</sub> capture, CYL requires 15 % lower CO<sub>2</sub> capture and thus 41 % lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the CtJ platform than COC. LCCA of CO<sub>2</sub>-derived fuels is projected to be very close to the $170/tonne CO<sub>2</sub> carbon tax target in 2030. Thus, CO<sub>2</sub>-derived jet fuels are expected to compete with fossil fuels in the Canadian market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007378\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007378","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sustainability assessment of catalyst design on CO2-derived fuel production
Levelized carbon cost abatement (LCCA) and technology learning curves (TLC) are combined to assess the current technology gaps for expediting the deployment of CO2-based renewable fuels. This study is conducted across three levels: Assessing the impact of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) catalyst improvement on products, estimating the potential reduction in CO2 emissions, and calculating the cost reduction per unit of avoided CO2 emissions. A novel hybrid approach combines bottom-up TEA and LCA tools to assess FTS catalysts, while top-down TLC methodology evaluates future projections of the CO2 to jet fuel (CtJ) platform. The evaluation and comparison of the newly designed FTS catalyst (CYL) and a conventional catalyst (COC) on the CtJ platform are conducted within this scope. Replacing COC with CYL leads to an increase of >170 % in catalyst cost. However, despite the increase in catalyst cost, the overall fuel production of the CtJ platform is boosted by 16 %, and the energy efficiency is improved by +13 %. Consequently, the CYL catalyst enables the production of jet fuel and diesel at a lower cost (−15 % to −17 %) compared to COC from 2027 to 2050. Furthermore, for both cases' equal net CO2 capture, CYL requires 15 % lower CO2 capture and thus 41 % lower CO2 emissions from the CtJ platform than COC. LCCA of CO2-derived fuels is projected to be very close to the $170/tonne CO2 carbon tax target in 2030. Thus, CO2-derived jet fuels are expected to compete with fossil fuels in the Canadian market.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.