谈论可信度、学生和引导:在演练汇报中学习在线评价教学的机会

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sarah McGrew
{"title":"谈论可信度、学生和引导:在演练汇报中学习在线评价教学的机会","authors":"Sarah McGrew","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers need opportunities to learn to teach online evaluations as pressure grows on schools to teach these skills. Debriefs after teachers rehearse facilitating discussions about online source credibility provide a promising context for such learning. We consider opportunities for teacher learning present in these debriefs with thirteen teachers participating in a professional development program. Analyses of six rehearsal transcripts revealed that teachers focused on three topics: how they reasoned about source credibility, how to support students’ reasoning about credibility, and general discussion facilitation strategies. Rehearsal debriefs may create opportunities to learn about critical elements of teaching students to evaluate digital content.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking about credibility, students, and facilitation: Opportunities to learn about teaching online evaluations in rehearsal debriefs\",\"authors\":\"Sarah McGrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Teachers need opportunities to learn to teach online evaluations as pressure grows on schools to teach these skills. Debriefs after teachers rehearse facilitating discussions about online source credibility provide a promising context for such learning. We consider opportunities for teacher learning present in these debriefs with thirteen teachers participating in a professional development program. Analyses of six rehearsal transcripts revealed that teachers focused on three topics: how they reasoned about source credibility, how to support students’ reasoning about credibility, and general discussion facilitation strategies. Rehearsal debriefs may create opportunities to learn about critical elements of teaching students to evaluate digital content.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24003469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24003469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着学校教授在线评价技能的压力越来越大,教师需要有机会学习这些技能。教师在演练如何促进关于在线资料来源可信度的讨论后进行的汇报,为这种学习提供了一个很好的环境。我们考虑了 13 位参加专业发展项目的教师在这些汇报中的学习机会。对六份演练记录的分析表明,教师们主要关注三个主题:他们如何推理来源可信度、如何支持学生推理可信度以及一般的讨论促进策略。排练汇报可以为学习教导学生评估数字内容的关键要素创造机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talking about credibility, students, and facilitation: Opportunities to learn about teaching online evaluations in rehearsal debriefs
Teachers need opportunities to learn to teach online evaluations as pressure grows on schools to teach these skills. Debriefs after teachers rehearse facilitating discussions about online source credibility provide a promising context for such learning. We consider opportunities for teacher learning present in these debriefs with thirteen teachers participating in a professional development program. Analyses of six rehearsal transcripts revealed that teachers focused on three topics: how they reasoned about source credibility, how to support students’ reasoning about credibility, and general discussion facilitation strategies. Rehearsal debriefs may create opportunities to learn about critical elements of teaching students to evaluate digital content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信