Chunxiu Zhao , Jinghong Shi , Na Zhu , Pingliang Yang , Bingbing Xiang , Yunke Dai , Shun Wang
{"title":"糖尿病患者术前口服碳水化合物负荷的临床有效性和安全性:系统综述","authors":"Chunxiu Zhao , Jinghong Shi , Na Zhu , Pingliang Yang , Bingbing Xiang , Yunke Dai , Shun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate (POC) for people with diabetes remain controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed studies comparing POC to fasting or placebo in elective surgery for diabetic adults, focusing on gastric volume, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and glycemic control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies (n = 1870 patients) were included. POC did not significantly increase gastric volume or aspiration risk in well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Effects on perioperative glucose control varied. POC improved patient comfort and reduced preoperative hypoglycemia in gestational diabetes. Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in cardiac surgery patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>POC is safe for well-controlled type 2 diabetics, enhancing comfort and reducing preoperative hypoglycemia without increasing aspiration risk. However, its effects on glucose control and postoperative outcomes vary. Personalized approaches are crucial, particularly for poorly controlled diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 103140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading in patients with diabetes: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Chunxiu Zhao , Jinghong Shi , Na Zhu , Pingliang Yang , Bingbing Xiang , Yunke Dai , Shun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate (POC) for people with diabetes remain controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed studies comparing POC to fasting or placebo in elective surgery for diabetic adults, focusing on gastric volume, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and glycemic control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies (n = 1870 patients) were included. POC did not significantly increase gastric volume or aspiration risk in well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Effects on perioperative glucose control varied. POC improved patient comfort and reduced preoperative hypoglycemia in gestational diabetes. Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in cardiac surgery patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>POC is safe for well-controlled type 2 diabetics, enhancing comfort and reducing preoperative hypoglycemia without increasing aspiration risk. However, its effects on glucose control and postoperative outcomes vary. Personalized approaches are crucial, particularly for poorly controlled diabetes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124002017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124002017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading in patients with diabetes: A systematic review
Background
The effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate (POC) for people with diabetes remain controversial.
Methods
We systematically reviewed studies comparing POC to fasting or placebo in elective surgery for diabetic adults, focusing on gastric volume, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and glycemic control.
Results
Fourteen studies (n = 1870 patients) were included. POC did not significantly increase gastric volume or aspiration risk in well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Effects on perioperative glucose control varied. POC improved patient comfort and reduced preoperative hypoglycemia in gestational diabetes. Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in cardiac surgery patients.
Conclusion
POC is safe for well-controlled type 2 diabetics, enhancing comfort and reducing preoperative hypoglycemia without increasing aspiration risk. However, its effects on glucose control and postoperative outcomes vary. Personalized approaches are crucial, particularly for poorly controlled diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care.
Types of Publications:
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.