接受或拒绝尼森胃底折叠术患者的喉咽反流

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Adam Gardi, Sriprachodaya Gaddam, Philip Maxwell, Lauren E Melley, Allison Altman, Parastou Ranjbar, Omar Ramadan, Robert T Sataloff
{"title":"接受或拒绝尼森胃底折叠术患者的喉咽反流","authors":"Adam Gardi, Sriprachodaya Gaddam, Philip Maxwell, Lauren E Melley, Allison Altman, Parastou Ranjbar, Omar Ramadan, Robert T Sataloff","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether Robotic or Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) improves voice outcomes and symptoms in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) compared to patients who were candidates for surgery but elected to receive treatment with antireflux medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who visited the office of the senior author, received a diagnosis of LPR, and were candidates for LNF. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received LNF surgery (Nissen-received, n = 50) and those who declined surgery (Nissen-declined, n = 54). Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) collected pre- and post-treatment were compared between groups. 24-hour pH-impedance results also were evaluated pre- and post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24-hour pH-impedance testing from patients in the Nissen-received group showed a statistically significant decrease in six recording categories at the proximal sensor and five at the distal sensor, pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. Proximal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) supine reflux, (3) acidic reflux, (4) weakly acidic reflux, (5) upright reflux, and (6) total postprandial reflux. Distal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) weakly acidic reflux, (3) supine reflux, (4) upright reflux, and (5) upright weakly acidic reflux. There were statistically significant differences in the changes from pre- to post-intervention when comparing between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups at three proximal and three distal recordings. The proximal recording categories were (1) total reflux, (2) upright reflux, and (3) upright weakly acidic reflux, and the distal sensor categories were (1) upright reflux, (2) upright weakly acidic reflux, and (3) weakly acidic reflux. The Nissen-received group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in total RFS score, as well as the subcategory score of erythema, from pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. There were statistically significant differences in the subcategory scores of erythema and diffuse laryngeal edema when comparing the changes from pre- to post-intervention between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LNF provides improved LPR control compared with treatment with antireflux medication alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients Who Received or Declined Nissen Fundoplication.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Gardi, Sriprachodaya Gaddam, Philip Maxwell, Lauren E Melley, Allison Altman, Parastou Ranjbar, Omar Ramadan, Robert T Sataloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether Robotic or Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) improves voice outcomes and symptoms in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) compared to patients who were candidates for surgery but elected to receive treatment with antireflux medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who visited the office of the senior author, received a diagnosis of LPR, and were candidates for LNF. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received LNF surgery (Nissen-received, n = 50) and those who declined surgery (Nissen-declined, n = 54). Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) collected pre- and post-treatment were compared between groups. 24-hour pH-impedance results also were evaluated pre- and post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24-hour pH-impedance testing from patients in the Nissen-received group showed a statistically significant decrease in six recording categories at the proximal sensor and five at the distal sensor, pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. Proximal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) supine reflux, (3) acidic reflux, (4) weakly acidic reflux, (5) upright reflux, and (6) total postprandial reflux. Distal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) weakly acidic reflux, (3) supine reflux, (4) upright reflux, and (5) upright weakly acidic reflux. There were statistically significant differences in the changes from pre- to post-intervention when comparing between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups at three proximal and three distal recordings. The proximal recording categories were (1) total reflux, (2) upright reflux, and (3) upright weakly acidic reflux, and the distal sensor categories were (1) upright reflux, (2) upright weakly acidic reflux, and (3) weakly acidic reflux. The Nissen-received group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in total RFS score, as well as the subcategory score of erythema, from pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. There were statistically significant differences in the subcategory scores of erythema and diffuse laryngeal edema when comparing the changes from pre- to post-intervention between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LNF provides improved LPR control compared with treatment with antireflux medication alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估机器人或腹腔镜尼森氏胃底折叠术(LNF)是否能改善喉咽反流(LPR)患者的嗓音效果和症状,与那些适合手术但选择只接受抗反流药物治疗的患者进行比较:研究设计:回顾性病历审查:研究设计:回顾性病历审查。方法:对到资深作者办公室就诊、被诊断为 LPR 并有 LNF 候选资格的患者进行回顾性病历审查。患者分为两组:接受 LNF 手术的患者(尼森-接受,50 人)和拒绝手术的患者(尼森-拒绝,54 人)。对两组患者治疗前后的反流评分(RFS)进行比较。结果:接受尼森手术组患者的 24 小时 pH 阻抗测试显示,从接受尼森胃底折叠术前到接受尼森手术后,近端传感器的六个记录类别和远端传感器的五个记录类别出现了统计学意义上的显著下降。近端传感器类别包括(1) 全部反流,(2) 仰卧反流,(3) 酸性反流,(4) 弱酸性反流,(5) 直立反流,以及 (6) 餐后全部反流。远端传感器类别包括(1)全反流,(2)弱酸性反流,(3)仰卧位反流,(4)直立位反流和(5)直立位弱酸性反流。在三次近端记录和三次远端记录中,尼森接受组和尼森拒绝组从干预前到干预后的变化有明显的统计学差异。近端记录类别为(1)完全反流、(2)直立反流和(3)直立弱酸性反流,远端传感器类别为(1)直立反流、(2)直立弱酸性反流和(3)弱酸性反流。从接受尼森胃底折叠术前到接受尼森胃底折叠术后,接受尼森胃底折叠术组的 RFS 总分和红斑子类别得分均有统计学意义的显著改善。比较接受尼森手术组和拒绝尼森手术组从干预前到干预后的变化,红斑和弥漫性喉水肿亚类评分有统计学意义的差异:结论:与单独使用抗反流药物治疗相比,LNF 能够更好地控制 LPR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients Who Received or Declined Nissen Fundoplication.

Objective: To evaluate whether Robotic or Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) improves voice outcomes and symptoms in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) compared to patients who were candidates for surgery but elected to receive treatment with antireflux medical management alone.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who visited the office of the senior author, received a diagnosis of LPR, and were candidates for LNF. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received LNF surgery (Nissen-received, n = 50) and those who declined surgery (Nissen-declined, n = 54). Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) collected pre- and post-treatment were compared between groups. 24-hour pH-impedance results also were evaluated pre- and post-treatment.

Results: 24-hour pH-impedance testing from patients in the Nissen-received group showed a statistically significant decrease in six recording categories at the proximal sensor and five at the distal sensor, pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. Proximal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) supine reflux, (3) acidic reflux, (4) weakly acidic reflux, (5) upright reflux, and (6) total postprandial reflux. Distal sensor categories included: (1) total reflux, (2) weakly acidic reflux, (3) supine reflux, (4) upright reflux, and (5) upright weakly acidic reflux. There were statistically significant differences in the changes from pre- to post-intervention when comparing between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups at three proximal and three distal recordings. The proximal recording categories were (1) total reflux, (2) upright reflux, and (3) upright weakly acidic reflux, and the distal sensor categories were (1) upright reflux, (2) upright weakly acidic reflux, and (3) weakly acidic reflux. The Nissen-received group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in total RFS score, as well as the subcategory score of erythema, from pre- to post-Nissen fundoplication. There were statistically significant differences in the subcategory scores of erythema and diffuse laryngeal edema when comparing the changes from pre- to post-intervention between the Nissen-received and Nissen-declined groups.

Conclusion: LNF provides improved LPR control compared with treatment with antireflux medication alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信