Epstein-Barr 病毒相关胃癌的临床病理特征和围手术期治疗:一项回顾性研究

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1159/000542369
Zhi Ji, Lila Zhu, Xia Wang, Hongli Li, Jingjing Duan, Le Zhang, Ting Deng, Rui Liu, Yi Ba
{"title":"Epstein-Barr 病毒相关胃癌的临床病理特征和围手术期治疗:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Zhi Ji, Lila Zhu, Xia Wang, Hongli Li, Jingjing Duan, Le Zhang, Ting Deng, Rui Liu, Yi Ba","doi":"10.1159/000542369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Itroduction: The clinicopathological characteristics and efficacy of perioperative treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative treatment outcomes of patients with EBVaGC who underwent radical gastrectomy in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2016 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 128 patients with EBVaGC. Histologically, 126 (98.4%) patients had adenocarcinoma and only 2 (1.6%) had adenosquamous carcinoma. In addition, 18 (14.1%) had nerve invasion and 29 (22.7%) had vascular invasion. Notably, 41 (32.0%) patients had tumors in the proximal stomach and 69 (53.9%) had no lymph node metastasis. Proficient mismatch repair was confirmed in all 104 patients with available results. Overall, 16 (12.5%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, 81 (63.3%) received adjuvant therapy, and 10 (7.8%) received perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In total, 22 patients experienced disease progression or had died. The 3-year DFS rate was 75.0%. DFS was relatively poorer for patients with advanced tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, disease stage, and vascular invasion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBVaGC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Advanced T, N, and disease stages, in addition to vascular invasion, were predictive of poorer DFS. However, the efficacy of perioperative treatment of EBVaGC remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological Characteristics and Perioperative Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Ji, Lila Zhu, Xia Wang, Hongli Li, Jingjing Duan, Le Zhang, Ting Deng, Rui Liu, Yi Ba\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Itroduction: The clinicopathological characteristics and efficacy of perioperative treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative treatment outcomes of patients with EBVaGC who underwent radical gastrectomy in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2016 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 128 patients with EBVaGC. Histologically, 126 (98.4%) patients had adenocarcinoma and only 2 (1.6%) had adenosquamous carcinoma. In addition, 18 (14.1%) had nerve invasion and 29 (22.7%) had vascular invasion. Notably, 41 (32.0%) patients had tumors in the proximal stomach and 69 (53.9%) had no lymph node metastasis. Proficient mismatch repair was confirmed in all 104 patients with available results. Overall, 16 (12.5%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, 81 (63.3%) received adjuvant therapy, and 10 (7.8%) received perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In total, 22 patients experienced disease progression or had died. The 3-year DFS rate was 75.0%. DFS was relatively poorer for patients with advanced tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, disease stage, and vascular invasion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBVaGC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Advanced T, N, and disease stages, in addition to vascular invasion, were predictive of poorer DFS. However, the efficacy of perioperative treatment of EBVaGC remains uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542369\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言方法:回顾性分析2016年9月至2022年5月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受根治性胃切除术的EBVaGC患者的临床病理特征及围手术期治疗效果:回顾性分析2016年9月至2022年5月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受根治性胃切除术的EBVaGC患者的临床病理特征和围手术期治疗效果。分析了无病生存期(DFS),并进行了Cox回归分析以确定风险因素:研究队列包括128名EBVaGC患者。从组织学角度来看,126 例(98.4%)患者为腺癌,只有 2 例(1.6%)为腺鳞癌。此外,18 例(14.1%)有神经侵犯,29 例(22.7%)有血管侵犯。值得注意的是,41 例(32.0%)患者的肿瘤位于胃近端,69 例(53.9%)患者没有淋巴结转移。所有 104 例患者的错配修复结果均得到证实。总体而言,16 例(12.5%)患者接受了新辅助治疗,81 例(63.3%)接受了辅助治疗,10 例(7.8%)接受了围手术期免疫疗法联合化疗。共有22名患者出现疾病进展或死亡。3年生存率为75.0%。肿瘤(T)晚期、淋巴结(N)晚期、疾病分期和血管侵犯晚期患者的 DFS 相对较差:结论:EBVaGC具有独特的临床病理特征和预后。结论:EBVaGC具有独特的临床病理特征和预后,除血管侵犯外,晚期T期、N期和疾病分期也预示着较差的DFS。然而,EBVaGC围手术期治疗的疗效仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Perioperative Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Itroduction: The clinicopathological characteristics and efficacy of perioperative treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) were investigated.

Methods: The clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative treatment outcomes of patients with EBVaGC who underwent radical gastrectomy in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2016 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.

Results: The study cohort included 128 patients with EBVaGC. Histologically, 126 (98.4%) patients had adenocarcinoma and only 2 (1.6%) had adenosquamous carcinoma. In addition, 18 (14.1%) had nerve invasion and 29 (22.7%) had vascular invasion. Notably, 41 (32.0%) patients had tumors in the proximal stomach and 69 (53.9%) had no lymph node metastasis. Proficient mismatch repair was confirmed in all 104 patients with available results. Overall, 16 (12.5%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, 81 (63.3%) received adjuvant therapy, and 10 (7.8%) received perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In total, 22 patients experienced disease progression or had died. The 3-year DFS rate was 75.0%. DFS was relatively poorer for patients with advanced tumor (T) stage, lymph node (N) stage, disease stage, and vascular invasion.

Conclusion: EBVaGC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Advanced T, N, and disease stages, in addition to vascular invasion, were predictive of poorer DFS. However, the efficacy of perioperative treatment of EBVaGC remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信