比利时佛兰德斯地区肾病专家对电子显微镜价值的看法。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROSCOPY
Ultrastructural Pathology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083
Laura Desnerck, Laure-Anne Kerckhaert, Steven Van Laecke, Amélie Dendooven
{"title":"比利时佛兰德斯地区肾病专家对电子显微镜价值的看法。","authors":"Laura Desnerck, Laure-Anne Kerckhaert, Steven Van Laecke, Amélie Dendooven","doi":"10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electron microscopy (EM) is an important complementary tool in biopsy diagnosis of kidney disease. However, EM is a costly technique and not universally available. In order to understand nephrologists' perspectives on EM, a survey among Flemish nephrologists was conducted. The survey explores nephrologists' knowledge and satisfaction with EM, the barriers in its use, and its role in decision-making.A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch-speaking nephrologists in Belgium (Flanders) via the professional organization NBVN <i>(Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie)</i>.The average satisfaction of EM accessibility in nephrologists, was 4.0 on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The main barrier in ordering EM appeared to be the long turnaround time, indicated by 32.5% of nephrologists. The reports were found mostly understandable by 61.0% of the nephrologists. The impact of EM on diagnosis of kidney disease was estimated higher than its impact on the treatment: 24.4% of respondents estimated diagnosis changes in less than 5% of cases, versus 68.3% estimated treatment changes in less than 5% of cases.This study provides key insights into nephrologists' perception on EM services, revealing high overall satisfaction. However, there is potential for improvement, especially regarding turnaround times.</p>","PeriodicalId":23430,"journal":{"name":"Ultrastructural Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"575-581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of electron microscopy as perceived by nephrologists in Flanders, Belgium.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Desnerck, Laure-Anne Kerckhaert, Steven Van Laecke, Amélie Dendooven\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electron microscopy (EM) is an important complementary tool in biopsy diagnosis of kidney disease. However, EM is a costly technique and not universally available. In order to understand nephrologists' perspectives on EM, a survey among Flemish nephrologists was conducted. The survey explores nephrologists' knowledge and satisfaction with EM, the barriers in its use, and its role in decision-making.A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch-speaking nephrologists in Belgium (Flanders) via the professional organization NBVN <i>(Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie)</i>.The average satisfaction of EM accessibility in nephrologists, was 4.0 on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The main barrier in ordering EM appeared to be the long turnaround time, indicated by 32.5% of nephrologists. The reports were found mostly understandable by 61.0% of the nephrologists. The impact of EM on diagnosis of kidney disease was estimated higher than its impact on the treatment: 24.4% of respondents estimated diagnosis changes in less than 5% of cases, versus 68.3% estimated treatment changes in less than 5% of cases.This study provides key insights into nephrologists' perception on EM services, revealing high overall satisfaction. However, there is potential for improvement, especially regarding turnaround times.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrastructural Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"575-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrastructural Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrastructural Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子显微镜(EM)是活检诊断肾脏疾病的重要辅助工具。然而,电子显微镜是一种昂贵的技术,并非普遍可用。为了了解肾脏病专家对 EM 的看法,我们对佛兰德的肾脏病专家进行了一项调查。通过专业组织 NBVN(Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie)向比利时(佛兰德斯)讲荷兰语的肾病学家发放了调查问卷。肾病学家对 EM 可及性的平均满意度为 4.0,满意度从 1(非常不满意)到 5(非常满意)不等。32.5%的肾科医生表示,订购电子病历的主要障碍似乎是周转时间过长。61.0%的肾病学专家认为这些报告大多可以理解。据估计,EM 对肾脏疾病诊断的影响高于对治疗的影响:24.4% 的受访者估计,在不到 5% 的病例中,诊断发生了变化,而 68.3% 的受访者估计,在不到 5% 的病例中,治疗发生了变化。然而,仍有改进的余地,尤其是在周转时间方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value of electron microscopy as perceived by nephrologists in Flanders, Belgium.

Electron microscopy (EM) is an important complementary tool in biopsy diagnosis of kidney disease. However, EM is a costly technique and not universally available. In order to understand nephrologists' perspectives on EM, a survey among Flemish nephrologists was conducted. The survey explores nephrologists' knowledge and satisfaction with EM, the barriers in its use, and its role in decision-making.A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch-speaking nephrologists in Belgium (Flanders) via the professional organization NBVN (Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie).The average satisfaction of EM accessibility in nephrologists, was 4.0 on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The main barrier in ordering EM appeared to be the long turnaround time, indicated by 32.5% of nephrologists. The reports were found mostly understandable by 61.0% of the nephrologists. The impact of EM on diagnosis of kidney disease was estimated higher than its impact on the treatment: 24.4% of respondents estimated diagnosis changes in less than 5% of cases, versus 68.3% estimated treatment changes in less than 5% of cases.This study provides key insights into nephrologists' perception on EM services, revealing high overall satisfaction. However, there is potential for improvement, especially regarding turnaround times.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrastructural Pathology
Ultrastructural Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrastructural Pathology is the official journal of the Society for Ultrastructural Pathology. Published bimonthly, we are the only journal to be devoted entirely to diagnostic ultrastructural pathology. Ultrastructural Pathology is the ideal journal to publish high-quality research on the following topics: Advances in the uses of electron microscopic and immunohistochemical techniques Correlations of ultrastructural data with light microscopy, histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, biochemistry, cell and tissue culturing, and electron probe analysis Important new, investigative, clinical, and diagnostic EM methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信